substrate), respectively (versus Ag/AgCl). Ellipsometry
measurements indicated a film thickness of 40 nm. The
polymer film exhibited a sessile water contact angle of 691
(unmodified gold electrodes gave contact angles of 771)
showing that the polymer is relatively hydrophilic.
The authors would like to thank Yildiz Uludag for the
ellipsometry results. This project was supported by the
award of a Royal Society International Incoming Fellowship
(to D.L.), Grant Reference: FI071114.
Notes and references
To demonstrate the possibility of further modification,
the double bonds of electrosynthesised PNPEDMA were
cross-linked using N,N-diethyldithiocarbamic acid benzyl
ester (iniferter) as initiator, as described in the ESIw. The
contact angle of the cross-linked material increased to 711,
indicating that grafting of hydrophobic moieties had occurred.
X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements of
washed polymer films demonstrated the presence of sulfur
following iniferter grafting (see ESIw, Fig. S2 and S3).
Grafting of poly(methacrylic acid) brushes to the iniferter-
activated film (see ESIw) gave a contact angle of 621; in
addition the grafting of molecularly imprinted polymers to
the PNPEDMA layer has been carried out and will be
reported elsewhere. An electrode coated with an iniferter-
treated electropolymerised film was immersed in a control
solution (50 mM HClO4 solution, purged with nitrogen for
10 minutes, then irradiated for 20 minutes) to investigate the
effect of UV exposure on the electrochemical behaviour of the
film. Electrochemical characterisation was carried out using
differential pulse voltammetry and showed a noticeable in-
crease in the current–voltage characteristics with increased
irradiation (Fig. S4, ESIw). The reason for this behaviour is
not known; however, it is highly likely that the iniferter grafted
to the electropolymerised film via the vinyl moieties produces
macroradicals upon irradiation, which can combine to form
additional cross-links between neighbouring polymer chains.
As was seen in the previous case, increased cross-linking
facilitates charge transport through the film, resulting in a
higher measured conductivity.
z Synthesis of NPEDMA: N-phenylethylenediamine (1.0 g, 0.96 mL,
7.3 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (20 mL) which was cooled in ice
before the addition of methacrylic anhydride (1.1 g, 1.06 mL,
7.1 mmol). The stirred mixture was held at 0 1C for 3 h before
warming to room temperature. The solvent was removed using a
rotary evaporator and the residue dispersed in diethyl ether (25 mL).
The ether phase was washed with 0.1 M NaOH (4 ꢃ 25 mL), followed
by water (1 ꢃ 25 mL), dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and
evaporated to give a brown oil which formed colourless crystals on
standing in a refrigerator. The yield was 99%; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3, d): 1.9 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.3 (d, 2H, –CH2), 3.7 (d, 2H, –CH2), 5.3
(s, 1H,QCH2), 5.7 (s, 1H,QCH2), 6.6 (d, 2H, o-H), 6.7 (t, 1H, p-H),
7.2 (m, 2H, m-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, d): 18.6, 39.3, 43.9,
112.7, 117.7, 119.9, 129.3, 139.7 147.9, 169.0; IR (KBr disc): 3345,
3000, 2920, 1655, 1603, 1514, 1322, 750, 694 cmꢁ1
.
1 V. Saxena and B. D. Malhotra, Curr. Appl. Phys., 2003, 3, 293;
J. Stejskal and R. G. Gilbert, Pure Appl. Chem., 2002, 74, 857.
2 L. M. Huang, Z. B. Wang, H. T. Wang, X. L. Cheng, A. Mitra and
Y. S. Yan, J. Mater. Chem., 2002, 12, 388; M. Keraki-sla, M. Sac
and U. Akbulut, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1996, 59, 1347; J. Stejskal,
I. Sapurina, M. Trchova and E. Konyushenko, Macromolecules,
2008, 41, 3530.
¸ ak
´
3 A. A. Argun, P. H. Aubert, B. C. Thompson, I. Schwendeman,
C. L. Gaupp, J. Hwang, N. J. Pinto, D. B. Tanner,
A. G. MacDiarmid and J. R. Reynolds, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16,
4401–4412.
4 D. D. Borole, U. R. Kapadi, P. P. Mahulikar and
D. G. Hundiwale, Des. Monomers Polym., 2006, 9, 1; T. Ahuja,
I. A. Mir, D. Kumar and Rajesh, Biomaterials, 2007, 28, 791;
K. Greennan, A. J. Killard and M. R. Smyth, Electroanalysis,
2005, 17, 1360.
5 J. Y. Shimano and A. G. MacDiarmid, Synth. Met., 2001, 123,
251; A. G. MacDiarmid and A. J. Epstein, Synth. Met., 1995, 65,
103.
6 S. A. Chen and G. W. Hwang, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 3950.
7 D. A. W. Soares and A. A. A. de Queiroz, Macromol. Symp., 2001,
170, 221.
8 J. M. Liu, L. F. Sun, J. H. Hwang and S. C. Yang, Mater. Res. Soc.
Symp. Proc., 1992, 247, 601.
9 N. V. Bhat and N. V. Joshi, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1993, 50,
1423.
10 Y. Tao, J. X. Zhao and C. X. Wu, Eur. Polym. J., 2005, 41, 1342;
B. Das, S. Kar, S. Chakraborty, D. Chakraborty and S. Gangopadhyay,
J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1998, 69, 841.
11 J. P. Pouget, M. E. Jozefowicz, A. J. Epstein, X. Tang and
A. G. MacDiarmid, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 779.
12 Z. H. Wang, H. H. S. Javadi, A. Ray, A. G. MacDiarmid and
A. J. Epstein, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 1990, 42, 5411.
13 S. X. Xing, C. Zhao, S. Y. Jing and Z. C. Wang, Polymer, 2006, 47,
2305.
AFM measurements were also made on the films prepared
during the grafting of poly(methacrylic acid) to an electro-
polymerised layer of NPEDMA (Fig. S5, ESIw). As can be
seen, the bare gold electrode (Fig. S5a)w displays a typically
grainy morphology. Electropolymerisation of the monomer
leads to deposition of polymer on the surface, smoothing out
many of these features, but with a much greater average
roughness (21 ꢂ 5 nm, Fig. S5b) due to the formation of
‘‘bumps’’ in the polymer film. A UV-vis spectrum of a
similarly deposited film on indium tin oxide-coated glass was
recorded (Fig. S6, ESIw) and clearly shows the formation of a
conjugated polymer, with a spectrum very similar to the
emeraldine salt form of polyaniline.15 Following grafting of
a poly(methacrylic acid) coating, the roughness was again
reduced (4 ꢂ 2 nm, Fig. S5c).w
14 H.-R. Lin, Eur. Polym. J., 2001, 37, 1507.
15 R. Cruz-Silva, M. E. Nicho, M. C. Rese
´
ndiz, V. Agarwal,
F. F. Castillon and M. H. Farıas, Thin Solid Films, 2008, 516, 4793.
´
´
16 N. Chagneux, S. Camerlynck, E. Hamilton, F. M. L. Vilela and
D. C. Sherrington, Macromolecules, 2007, 40, 3183.
17 H. C. Haas and M. S. Simon, J. Polym. Sci., 1955, 17, 421; G. Y.
N. Chan, M. G. Loone, D. H. Solomon and S. Veluayithan, Aust.
J. Chem., 1998, 51, 31; A. Hirao and M. Kitamura, Macro-
molecules, 2004, 37, 4770.
18 M. Sibrian-Vazquez and D. A. Spivak, Macromolecules, 2003, 36,
5105; M. Sibrian-Vazquez and D. A. Spivak, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 7827; J. Le Jeune and D. A. Spivak, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem., 2007, 389, 433.
This monomer adds to the range of orthogonally poly-
merisable bifunctional monomers, for example the ‘‘Jekyll
and Hyde’’ monomer glycidyl methacrylate,16 and others.17
These can be exploited via the differential reactivity of
the two monomer species. Another interesting application
of unsymmetrical monomers is their ability to form
OMNiMIPs.18
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 2759–2761 | 2761