Communications
sequence for aniline derivatives. The reaction proceeds
efficiently under CO (1 atm), at room temperature (188C),
and with 5% catalyst loadings. Key features of the reaction
are the use of [Pd(OTs)2(MeCN)2] as precatalyst and the
powerful activating effect of the aniline–urea moiety (com-
pare Table 2, entry 1 (88%) versus acetanilide (0%)). The
reaction conditions can be easily manipulated to produce
either cyclic imidates (8) or methyl anthranilates (10). The use
ꢀ
of N-aryl urea derivatives that bear a terminal N H moiety
allows the generation of quinazolinones by in situ base-
mediated cyclization of the methoxycarbonylated products.
Finally, we have demonstrated the unique ability of the
Scheme 2. Mechanism of ester formation: direct solvolysis versus
imidate formation. a) For reagents see Table 2, 1.5 h, 95%.
ꢀ
diisopropyl urea moiety to function as a C H-activating and
-directing group that can be removed under neutral con-
ditions, which represents the selective hydrolysis of a urea
group in the presence of an ester group. We anticipate that
these reactions will be of substantial utility for the preparation
of anthranilic acids, and their derivatives, under mild con-
ditions from the corresponding aniline.
key heterocyclic pharmacophore in numerous drug substan-
ces.[13] Indeed, carbonylation of 9i followed by the addition of
potassium carbonate[14] and heating afforded the quinazoli-
none 14 in 80% overall yield in a one-pot sequence from 9i
(Scheme 3). Both 9e and 9 f reacted similarly to afford the
corresponding quinazolinones in 57 and 70% yields, respec- Experimental Section
General procedure for methoxycarbonylation: A Radleyꢀs reduced-
tively.
volume reaction vessel (10 mL) equipped with a stirring bar was
charged with the desired urea derivative (1 mmol), benzoquinone
(2 mmol), [Pd(OTs)2(MeCN)2] (5 mol%), tosic acid monohydrate
(0.5 mmol), THF (0.5 mL), and methanol (0.5 mL). The vessel was
connected to a Schlenk line and was briefly evacuated and stirred at
room temperature (188C), followed by charging with CO to 1 atm.
This cycle was repeated three times and the vessel left open to a
dynamic atmosphere of CO (1 atm). The reaction mixture was then
stirred at 188C and monitored by TLC. On completion (2–5 h), the
reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo, the residue dissolved in
CH2Cl2 and washed with HCl (1m). The organic layer was then
washed with water, dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated
in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (10–40% EtOAc/
petroleum ether afforded the pure products.
Scheme 3. One-pot carbonylation–cyclization route to quinazolinones.
Finally, we investigated conditions for the selective
cleavage of the urea moiety to provide convenient access to
the methyl anthranilates and anthranilic acids. During this
study we made the observation that aniline diisopropyl urea
derivatives undergo an unprecedented facile solvolysis in
methanol under neutral conditions.[15] Remarkably, we found
that simply heating 10c in water gave methyl anthranilate 15
in 85% yield with no ester hydrolysis. The unusual reactivity
of the diisopropyl urea moiety was further highlighted by the
lack of reaction of 10a and 10b under identical conditions.
Reaction of 10c with NaOH (1m) gave anthranilic acid 16 in
excellent yield, which highlighted the diisopropyl urea moiety
Received: December 1, 2008
Published online: January 23, 2009
ꢀ
Keywords: C H activation · carbonylation · heterocycles ·
heterogeneous catalysis · palladium
.
238; c) B. J. Li, S.-D. Yang, Z. J. Shi, Synlett 2008, 949 – 957; d) L.-
C. Campeau, D. R. Stuart, K. Fagnou, Aldrichimica Acta 2007,
40, 35.
ꢀ
as an efficient “traceless” ortho-directing C H activating
group for anilines (Scheme 4).
[2] During the preparation of this manuscript Yu and Giri reported
the first palladium(II)-catalyzed ortho carbonylation of benzoic
In summary, we have described a highly efficient,
palladium(II)-catalyzed, and ortho-selective carbonylation
and phenylacetic acids by C H insertion: R. Giri, J-Q. Yu, J.
[3] C. E. Houlden, C. D. Bailey, J. G. Ford, M. R. Gagnꢁ, G. C.
[4] For the stoichiometric reaction of aryl–PdII–amide complexes,
ꢀ
[5] For palladium-catalyzed C H activation reactions with phenyl
amides as directing groups, see: a) (vinylation) M. D. K. Boele,
G. P. F. van Strijdonck, A. H. M. de Vries, P. C. J. Kamer, J. G.
de Vries, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
Scheme 4. Facile hydrolysis of an aryl diisopropyl urea.
1832
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1830 –1833