Cyclohexane-1,2-diamines as Efficient Catalysts
4d in the title reaction. Indeed, we were able to identify Table 4. Catalyst deactivation by formation of pyrrole 9a.
the irreversible formation of pyrroles in a three-component
reaction between the catalyst, the nitroalkene, and the aro-
matic ketone as a novel pathway for the catalyst deactiva-
tion (Scheme 1).[23] For example, reaction of 6b and 7b in
the presence of 4d (20 mol-%) gave rise to 9b in 30% yield
based on the amount of catalyst employed. We propose the
formation of intermediate 11 formed by addition of in situ
Entry Additive (mol-%)
Yield 9 [%][a] Yield 8b [%] ee [%][b]
formed enamine 10 to the nitroalkene, which can either un-
dergo hydrolysis to the desired product 8 or can alterna-
tively undergo ring closure with formal elimination of
HNO2 and oxidation to form pyrrole 9.
1
2
3
–
30
27
30
0
72
58
45
0
96
96
95
–
PhCOOH
AcOH
4
TFA
5
6
7
8
HCOOH
PTSA
2-ClC6H4COOH
MeOH
0
0
30
26
24
0
6
18
20
0
–
10
57
64
58
56
53
62
61
92
93
96
95
93
93
93
92
9
NH4Cl
10
11
12
13
TBBP (20)
TBBP (15)
TBBP (10)
TBBP (5)
[a] Based on 4d. [b] Determined by HPLC (Chiralpak AS-H).
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have shown that a simple primary
amine catalyst can afford excellent enantioselectivity in the
conjugate addition of aromatic ketones and nitroalkenes.
For the first time, the formation of a pyrrole side product
as a mode for catalyst deactivation was observed. Further
studies focusing on the development and exploration of di-
amines as organocatalysts are currently under way.
Experimental Section
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Full experimental procedures and characterization data for
compounds 4, 5, 8 and 9.
Scheme 1. Catalyst deactivation by irreversible formation of pyr-
rols.
Acknowledgments
The mechanistic proposal put forward (Scheme 1) sug-
gests that protic additives should accelerate hydrolysis to
yield 8. On the other hand, protonation could also facilitate
the extrusion of nitrous acid as a first step towards the for-
mation of pyrroles 9. When the various acids, protic sol-
vents, or salts were screened, the pyrrole side products were
still observed (Table 4). A notable exception was found with
3,3Ј,5,5Ј-tetrabromo-2,2Ј-biphenol[7] (TBBP), which was
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(SPP 1179 Organokatalyse), the Deutsche Akademische Aus-
tauschdienst (DAAD; fellowship for R. R.), and the Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie.
[1] S. Sulzer-Mosse, A. Alexakis, Chem. Commun. 2007, 3123.
[2] S. B. Tsogoeva, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 1701.
able to completely suppress the formation of 9 when equal [3] K. Sakthivel, W. Notz, T. Bui, C. F. Barbas, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 5260.
amounts were employed with respect to 4d. Nevertheless,
the yield of 8 did not improve relative to that obtained for
the reaction in which no additives were employed.
[4] B. List, P. Pojarliev, H. J. Martin, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2423.
[5] D. Enders, A. Seki, Synlett 2002, 26.
[6] A. Alexakis, O. Andrey, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3611.
Further, following the mechanistic rational depicted in
Scheme 1, enamine 10 should be a decisive intermediate in
the catalytic cycle. However, only trace amounts of product
8 were observed when the secondary amine 5, presumably
forcing enamine formation, was employed as catalyst, even
at elevated temperatures or with benzoic acid as additive.
[7] Z. Yang, J. Liu, X. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Feng, Z. Su, C. Hu, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 2001.
[8] H. Huang, E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7170.
[9] S. B. Tsogoeva, S. Wei, Chem. Commun. 2006, 1451.
[10] K. Liu, H.-F. Cui, J. Nie, K.-Y. Dong, X.-J. Li, J.-A. Ma, Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 923.
[11] L.-W. Xu, Y. Lu, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2047.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 1305–1308
© 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
1307