to final product 2. The stereochemical outcome of this
stereoselective allylic transposition could be rationalized by
a [3,3]-sigmatropic reaction through transition state 13, in
which Pd(II) coordinates to the double bond on the less
hindered R-face opposite the acetate group and facilitates
the sigmatropic rearrangement on the ꢀ-face.11b,12
For the facile isolation of the hydrophilic final product 2,
the benzyl protecting groups of 12 were replaced with
acetates to give pentaacetate 14 by treating 12 with BCl3
and subsequent peracetylation in 90% overall yield. Finally,
the desired 1-epi-(+)-MK7607 (2) was delivered in 98%
yield upon treatment of 14 with triethylamine in MeOH and
purification on a Dowex 50 (H+) resin column. The
spectroscopic data (1H and 13C NMR) and optical rotation
for 2 were identical with those reported.5
Having achieved a selective synthesis of 2, we turned
our attention to the synthesis of (+)-MK7607 (1). We
chose to utilize 10 as a common intermediate and exploit
the route that would allow for the facile conversion to
the final natural product 1. Conceivably, the anti-SN2′ type
substitution of the tertiary hydroxyl group of 10 by an
oxygen nucleophile would provide a quick way to 1. Thus,
we investigated the feasibility of this transformation by
using various reaction conditions including the Mitsunobu
reaction.13 Unfortunately, all attempts to bring about this
transformation failed.
As an alternative approach for the desired transformation,
we decided to utilize the Winstein’s neighboring group
participation of C-2 acetate.14,15 To this end, the benzyl
groups of 10 were replaced with acetates to give 8 in 86%
overall yield (Scheme 4). The NOESY correlations of 8
was found that treatment of 8 with an excess of PBr3 in
CH2Cl2 led to the formation of the transposed allylic bromide
1517,18 as a single diastereomer in excellent yield (98%). On
the basis of the analysis of the NOE data, the relative
configuration of the newly introduced stereocenter was
assigned as ꢀ.16
Heating the obtained ꢀ-bromide 15 in refluxing wet ethanol
in the presence of Ag2CO3 afforded a 2:1 mixture of
inseparable acetates 16 and 17 in 80% combined yield. The
formation of both acetates 16 and 17, as well as the
configurational inversion of C-1, suggested that this reaction
involves the oxonium ion intermediate 18, which collapses
via path b but not via path a.14,19 Finally, removal of the
acetate groups in 16 and 17 with triethylamine in MeOH
and purification on a Dowex 50 (H+) resin column gave (+)-
MK7607 (1), whose [R]D value and other spectra were in
agreement with those reported.1
In this synthetic process, particularly worthy of note is
the stereospecific PBr3-mediated allylic-transposed bro-
mination of the tertiary allylic alcohol 8. It is known that
halogenation of tertiary allylic alcohols with PBr3 leads
to the transposed allylic bromides, and generally believed
that this transformation involves intra- or intermolecular
attack of the phosphate ester intermediate by bromide.20
To our knowledge, only a few precedents exist for the
cyclic systems, but the stereochemistry of the rearranged
products was ambiguously determined.21 Although more
systematic studies are needed to elucidate the origin of
the observed selective stereochemical outcome of 15, we
suggest that it could be a result of the SNi′ reaction
mechanism of intermediate phosphate ester 19. This
mechanistic assumption could be substantiated as follows.
To examine the possible stereodirecting effect of the C-2
acetoxyl group via anchimeric assistance, the nonanchimeric
Scheme 4. Synthesis of (+)-MK7607 (1)
(12) (a) Yuasa, Y.; Yuasa, Y. Synth. Commun. 2006, 36, 1671. (b)
Inomata, K.; Murata, Y.; Kato, H.; Tsukahara, Y.; Kinoshita, H.; Kotake,
H. Chem. Lett. 1985, 931.
(13) For related attempts, see: (a) Myers, A. G.; Glatthar, R.; Hammond,
M.; Harrington, P. M.; Kuo, E. Y.; Liang, J.; Schaus, S. E.; Wu, Y.; Xiang,
J.-N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5380. (b) Young, J.-j.; Jung, L.-j.; Cheng,
K.-m. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3411.
(14) Winstein, S.; Buckles, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 2780.
(15) For representative examples, see: (a) Davies, S. G.; Long, M. J. C.;
Smith, A. D. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4536. (b) Pei, Z.; Dong, H.; Ramstro¨m,
O. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6952.
(16) See Supporting Information for details.
(17) The synthesis of the enantiomer of bromide 15 as a mixture with
its C-1 isomer was previously reported, see: (a) Ogawa, S.; Hattori, T.;
Toyokuni, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1983, 56, 2077. (b) Ogawa, S.; Sakata,
Y.; Ito, N.; Watanabe, M.; Kabayama, K.; Itoh, M.; Korenaga, T. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 995.
(18) Contrary to a report that bromide 15 is unstable (see ref 17), the
pure bromide 15 proved to be fairly stable in our hands.
(19) Woodward, R. B.; Brutcher, F. V., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80,
209.
(20) For representative examples in an acyclic system, see: (a) Babler,
J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1262. (b) Bakkestuen, A. K.; Gundersen,
L.-L.; Petersen, D.; Utenova, B. T.; Vik, A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3,
1025.
(21) (a) Zhang, A.; Csutoras, C.; Zong, R.; Neumeyer, J. L. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 3239. (b) Nampalli, S.; Bhide, R. S.; Nakai, H. Synth. Commun.
1992, 22, 1165.
allowed the unequivocal assignment of the configuration of
C-5.16 With compound 8 in hand, efforts were directed to
the activation of C-1 position by suprafacial allylic transposi-
tion. After some trials with several halogenating reagents, it
(22) (a) Robin, J.-P.; Landais, Y. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 819. (b)
Ramage, R.; Griffiths, G. J.; Shutt, F. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1984, 1539.
(23) (a) Yajima, T.; Munakata, K. Chem. Lett. 1977, 891. (b) Koganty,
R. R.; Shambhu, M. B.; Digenis, G. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 4511.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 12, 2009
2585