I. Plantan et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 2676–2677
2677
Table 1
[Ru(
ment with trimethylsilyl cyanide in DMF under mild conditions
affording the crude N,O-bis-TMS-protected derivative of 8, which
yielded in turn the desired O-TMS-protected compound 2 via selec-
tive N-desilylation using buffered silica gel (pH 8).14 Column chro-
matography on buffered silica gel (pH 8) with gradient elution
(hexane/CH2Cl2) allowed the isolation of 2 as a single diastereomer
in 57% yield and with high chemical purity.
g
6-arene)(S,S)-R2NSO2DPEN]-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation of 4a
Ligand:
Ph
Ph
NHSO2NR2
NH2
a: R= Me
b: RR= -(CH2)5-
c: RR= -(CH2)2O(CH2)2-
a-c
In summary, (10S,3R,4R)-4-acetoxy-3-(20-fluoro-10-trimethylsi-
lyloxyethyl)-2-azetidinone (2) was prepared in 96% ee relying
upon asymmetric transfer hydrogenation as the key step using
HCO2H–Et3N (5:2) and catalyzed with 0.5% [Ru(1,3,5-
Et3C6H3)(S,S)-Me2NSO2DPEN]. The application of this reactive
intermediate in the synthesis of fluorine-containing trinems is un-
der study and the results will be communicated shortly.
Entry
[RuCl2(
g
6-arene)]2 arene=
Ligand
syn/antib
ee (syn, %)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1,3,5-Triethylbenzene
Hexamethylbenzene
Benzene
a
a
b
b
b
b
c
83:17
71:29
76:24
71:29
75:25
83:17
74:26
96
96
74
93
95
95
94
Mesitylene
1,3,5-Triethylbenzene
Hexamethylbenzene
Hexamethylbenzene
a
HCO2H–Et3N (5:2, 250
g
lL) was added to a mixture of 4 (1 mmol) and preformed
Supplementary data
[RuCl(
6-arene)(S,S)-R2NSO2DPEN] (0.5 mol %) in DMF (1 mL), and the reaction was
stirred at rt for 1 d to attain 100% conversion.
b
Determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy: d(syn) = ꢁ231, d(anti) = ꢁ228.
Supplementary data (experimental procedures and character-
ization data for all new compounds) associated with this article
c
Determined by HPLC analysis on a chiralcel OD column with hexane/2-PrOH/
CF3CO2H 97:3:0.2 (1 mL/min) and UV (k = 222 nm) detection: t(R,R) = 44 min,
t(S,S) = 58 min.
Asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of 4 in the presence of
References and notes
HCO2H–Et3N (5:2) was performed at rt using 0.5% of the in situ
generated catalyst which was prepared from [RuCl2(g
6-arene)]2
1. (a) Bonfiglio, G.; Russo, G.; Nicoletti, G. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2002, 11, 529–
544; (b) Deshmukh, A. R. A. S.; Bhawal, B. M.; Krishnaswamy, D.; Govande, V.
V.; Shinkre, B. A.; Jayanthi, A. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 1889–1920; (c)
Yoneyama, H.; Katsumata, R. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 1060–1075.
2. (a) Enantiocontrolled Synthesis of Fluoro-organic Compounds; Soloshonok, V. A.,
Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, 1999; (b) Mikami, K. In Asymmetric Fluoroorganic
Chemistry: Synthesis, Application and Future Directions; Ramachandran, P. V., Ed.;
American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2000; pp 255–269; (c) Mikami,
K.; Itoh, Y.; Yamanaka, M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1–16.
3. Mashima, K.; Matsumura, Y.; Kusano, K.; Kumobayashi, H.; Sayo, N.; Hori, Y.;
Ishizaki, T.; Akutagawa, S.; Takaya, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991, 609–
610. Therein, the best catalyst: Ru-(3,5-tBu2-binap) led to 99:1 dr and 99% ee.
4. See the following articles and references cited therein: (a) Berks, A. H.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 331–375; (b) Rossi, T.; Marchioro, C.; Paio, A.; Thomas,
and (S,S)-R2NSO2DPEN ligand in DMF at 80 °C. Screening various
catalysts (Table 1) led to the optimum result using [RuCl2(1,3,
5-Et3C6H3)]2 and (S,S)-Me2NSO2DPEN. The efficiency of this trans-
formation resides in the highly stereoselective DKR leading to the
formation of 5 in 83:17 dr (syn/anti) and in quantitative yield. Pure
syn-5 was easily isolated in 60% yield after a single column
chromatography eluting with CH2Cl2/Et2O (4:1) and chiral HPLC
analysis revealed an ee of 96%.
The syn-(2S,3S) configuration of the major diastereomer 5 was
confirmed by a combination of 1H NMR NOE analysis of its dehy-
drated derivative 9 (prepared under Mitsunobu conditions11
-
R. J.; Zarantonello, P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1653–1661.
ˇ
Scheme 1, step g) which showed E-geometry, and in the subse-
quent synthetic steps, by 1H NMR analysis using an improved
Mosher method12 involving the O-methyl-(R)- and O-methyl-(S)-
mandelates of 7.
ˇ ˇ
ˇ
5. (a) Copar, A.; Prevec, T.; Anzic, B.; Mesar, T.; Selic, L.; Vilar, M.; Šolmajer, T.
ˇ
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 971–975; (b) Plantan, I.; Selic, L.; Mesar, T.;
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
Štefanic, A. P.; Oblak, M.; Prezelj, A.; Hesse, L.; Andrejašic, M.; Vilar, M.; Turk,
ˇ
D.; Kocijan, A.; Prevec, T.; Vilfan, G.; Kocjan, D.; Copar, A.; Urleb, U.; Šolmajer, T.
J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 4113–4121.
ˇ
6. Plantan, I.; Prezelj, A.; Urleb, U.; Mohar, B.; Stephan, M. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP
In the following step, syn-5 was subjected to hydrolysis in boil-
ing 10% aq HCl to give the corresponding hydrochloride salt of ß-
amino acid 6. After treatment of the residue with Et3N in MeOH,
ß-amino acid 6 was isolated in 65% yield. Azetidinone formation
employing 2,20-dipyridyl disulfide and PPh3 in DMSO at 90 °C
and crucial slow addition of 6 in DMSO, resulted in the formation
of 7 in 60% isolated yield. We utilized the modified Ohno condi-
tions13 as we previously noted a partial loss of fluorine while mon-
158454, 2008.
7. (a) Welch, J. T.; Araki, K.; Kawecki, R.; Wichtowski, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
2454–2462; (b) Abouabdellah, A.; Welch, J. T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5,
1005–1013; (c) Antolini, L.; Forni, A.; Davoli, P.; Moretti, I.; Prati, F. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1998, 9, 285–292.
8. (a) Bergmann, E. D.; Cohen, S.; Shahak, I. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 3278–3285; (b)
Available from Narchem, USA.
9. (a) Šterk, D.; Stephan, M. S.; Mohar, B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 2605–
2608; (b) Catalysts for Fine Chemical Synthesis; Roberts, S. M., Whittall, J., Eds.;
John Wiley & Sons, 2007; Vol. 5, pp 113–116.
itoring the reaction progress by 19F NMR (
a,a,a-trifluorotoluene
10. In our hands, hydrogenation of 4 in MeOH under 50 atm of H2 at rt using 1% of
[RuCl(binap)(dmf)3]Cl and [RuI2(binap)] yielded, after complete conversion,
syn/anti ratios of 90:10 (80% ee for syn) and 94:6 (50% ee for syn), respectively.
11. Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1–28.
was used as the internal standard). HPLC analysis of the 7-O-Me-
(R)-mandelate revealed a diastereomeric ratio of 98:2, and 96%
ee for 7. This result indicates the retention of the stereochemistry
during the transformation sequence of syn-5 having 96% ee.
Protection of 7 using TBDMSCl/Et3N led to the preferential for-
mation of the N-TBDMS-protected compound. Due to this unex-
pected result, the preparation of 2 was carried out by direct
peracetic acid oxidation of 7 catalyzed by RuCl3ꢀxH2O followed
by O-TMS-protection. Under these conditions, the acetoxylation
proceeded smoothly furnishing 8 in a 4:1 trans/cis ratio as con-
firmed by 1H and 19F NMR. This mixture was subjected to treat-
12. 1H NMR analysis applying the modified Mosher method using O-methyl-(R)-
and O-methyl-(S)-mandelates of 7, gave
and Hb-4, respectively, and Dd
D
d
RS = ꢁ0.31 and ꢁ0.36 ppm for Ha-4
RS = 0.08 and 0.14 ppm for Ha,b-20, revealing a
(10S,4S) configuration for azetidinone 7. This corresponds to the (2S,3S)
configuration for syn-5. For a detailed explanation of this method, see: (a)
Latypov, S.; Seco, J. M.; Quiñoá, E.; Riguera, R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 504–515;
(b) Seco, J. M.; Quiñoá, E.; Riguera, R. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 17–118.
13. Kobayashi, S.; Iimori, T.; Izawa, T.; Ohno, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2406–
2408.
14. Armarego, W. L. F.; Chai, C. L. L. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals; Elsevier,
2003, p. 20.