LETTER
Three-Component Synthesis of Tricyclic Compounds
243
temperature. After water addition (1.0 mL), the reaction
mixture was extracted with diethyl ether (4 × 50 mL) and the
combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4. The
solvent was removed and the crude product was purified by
column chromatography (SiO2, pentane) affording the
desired product (54 mg, 0.23 mmol, 82%) as a colorless
crystalline solid.
Acknowledgment
We thank the German Science Foundation (DFG-Emmy Noether-
Program) for financial support.
References
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.13 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H),
6.75–6.65 (m, 2 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 2.94 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H),
2.84–2.70 (m, 4 H), 2.20 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 1.77 (s, 3 H),
1.72 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 157.9, 137.2,
128.8, 128.5, 123.9, 123.5, 122.7, 122.6, 113.6, 110.7, 55.2,
39.0, 33.3, 28.5, 28.1, 18.5, 18.1; MS m/z (%) = 240 (M+,
91), 238(75), 225(100), 210(26), 165(20); HRMS calcd for
C17H20O: m/z = 240.1514, found: m/z = 240.1522. (b) For a
recent flexible synthesis of phenanthrene derivatives see:
Fürstner, A.; Mamane, V. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6264; and
references cited therein.
(1) (a) Sonogashira, K. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis,
Vol. 3; Trost, B.; Flemming, I.; Pattenden, G., Eds.;
Pergamon Press: New York, 1991, 521. (b) Sonogashira, K.
In Metal-catalyzed Cross-coupling Reactions; Diederich,
F.; Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1998, 203.
(2) Besides secondary amines, primary amines such as tert-
butylamine, also gave the propargylic amine product in this
three component reaction, albeit in lower yields (46%).
(3) (a) Martinelli, M. J.; Nayyar, N. K.; Moher, E. D.; Dhokte,
U. P.; Pawlak, J. M.; Vaidyanathan, R. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
447. (b) The tosylation of propargylic alcohols (n = 1) under
these conditions gave the desired products only in moderate
yields (up to 25%) accompanied with the corresponding
propargylic chloride in up to 35% yield and recovered
starting material.
(8) Schlosser, M. In Organometallics in Synthesis; Wiley:
Chichester, 1994, 129–133.
(9) Typical procedure: Preparation of 1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-
2,3-dimethyl-dibenzo[a,c]cyclooctene (Scheme 6, structure
at the bottom): To 4-[2-(2-bromophenyl)-4,5-dimethyl-1,4-
cyclohexadien-1-yl]butyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (1.282
g, 2.62 mmol) in dry diethyl ether (5.0 mL) at –100 °C tert-
butyllithium (3.74 mL, 1.4 M in THF, 5.24 mmol, 2.0 equiv)
was added slowly, such that the reaction temperature did not
exceed –80 °C. Then, the reaction mixture was allowed to
warm up to room temperature. After water (2.0 mL) was
added, the reaction mixture was extracted with diethyl ether
(4 × 50 mL) and the combined organic phases were dried
over MgSO4. The solvent was removed and the crude
product was purified by column chromatography (SiO2,
pentane) affording the desired product (437 mg, 1.84 mmol,
70%) as a colorless oil.
(4) For recent cobalt(I)-catalyzed Diels–Alder reactions see:
(a) Hilt, G.; Lüers, S.; Polborn, K. Isr. J. Chem. 2001, 41,
317. (b) Hilt, G.; Smolko, K. I. Synthesis 2002, 686.
(c) Hilt, G.; Smolko, K. I. Synlett 2002, 1081.
(5) Typical procedure: Preparation of 3-[2-(2-bromophenyl)-
4,5-dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexadien-1-yl]propyl 4-
methylbenzenesulfonate (Scheme 4, n = 3): To 5-(2-
bromophenyl)-4-pentynyl-4-methylbenzenesulfonate (321
mg, 0.82 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) were added
CoBr2(dppe) (40 mg, 0.07 mmol, 9 mol%), 2,3-dimethyl-
1,3-butadiene (145 mg, 1.77 mmol, 2.0 equiv), zinc (300 mg,
4.69 mmol, 5.7 equiv) and ZnBr2 (100 mg, 0.45 mmol, 55
mol%) under nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature overnight. The crude product
was purified by column chromatography (SiO2,
1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ = 7.22–7.08 (m, 4 H), 3.16–
3.00 (m, 1 H), 2.90–2.75 (m, 1 H), 2.70–2.40 (m, 4 H), 1.98–
1.80 (m, 2 H), 1.77 –1.49 (m, 8 H), 1.44–1.11 (m, 2 H); 13
C
pentane:diethyl ether = 2:1) affording the desired product
(381 mg, 0.80 mmol, 98%) as a colorless oil.
NMR (75 MHz, C6D6): δ = 142.2 (Cq), 141.5(Cq), 132.2(Cq),
129.7 (CH), 128.5 (Cq), 127.4 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 125.8
(CH), 123.7 (Cq), 123.3 (Cq), 38.8 (CH2), 38.6 (CH2), 33.5
(CH2), 32.1 (CH2), 30.4 (CH2), 24.2 (CH2), 18.2 (CH3), 18.1
(CH3); MS m/z (%) = 238 (M+, 100), 223(18), 195(50),
181(57), 165(22); HRMS calcd for C18H22: m/z = 238.1721,
found: m/z = 238.1714.
Analytical data for 1,4,6,7-tetrahydro-2,3-dimethyl-
dibenzo[a,c]cycloheptene (Scheme 6, structure at the top):
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.25–7.02 (m, 4 H), 2.96–
2.87 (m, 2 H), 2.83–2.74 (m, 2 H), 2.48 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H),
2.10–1.98 (m, 2 H), 1.77 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 1.64 (s, 6 H);
13C NMR (75 MHz, C6D6): δ = 142.2 (Cq), 140.3 (Cq), 132.4
(Cq), 128.6 (CH), 128.2 (Cq), 126.1 (CH), 125.9 (CH), 125.4
(CH), 123.8 (Cq), 123.2 (Cq), 39.3 (CH2), 36.9 (CH2), 33.6
(CH2), 32.3 (CH2), 29.8 (CH2), 18.3 (CH3), 18.1 (CH3); MS
m/z (%) = 224 (M+, 100), 209(51), 195(24), 181(38),
165(22), 121(27); HRMS calcd for C17H20: m/z = 224.1565,
found: m/z = 224.1572.
1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ = 7.70–7.64 (m, 2 H), 7.39 (dd,
J = 8.4, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.00–6.85 (m, 2 H), 6.74–6.64 (m, 3
H), 4.77–3.63 (m, 2 H), 3.02–2.84 (m, 1 H), 2.56–2.34 (m, 3
H), 1.82 (s, 3 H), 1.80–1.35 (m, 10 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
C6D6): δ = 143.9, 143.6, 134.6, 133.0, 131.8, 130.6, 130.4,
129.7, 128.4, 128.1, 127.8, 123.6, 123.0, 122.8, 70.1, 39.4,
36.6, 29.4, 27.2, 21.1, 18.2, 17.9; MS m/z (%) = 474 (M+, 2),
208(15), 194(24), 179(12), 91(11), 74(100); HRMS calcd
for C24H27BrO3S: m/z = 474.0864, found: m/z = 474.0811.
(6) Parham, W. E.; Bradsher, C. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15,
300.
(7) (a) Typical procedure: Preparation of 7-methoxy-2,3-
dimethyl-1,4,9,10-tetrahydrophenanthrene (Scheme 5): To
2-[2-(2-bromo-4-methoxyphenyl)-4,5-dimethyl-1,4-
cyclohexadien-1-yl]ethyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (134
mg, 0.27 mmol) in anhyd THF (5.0 mL) at –90 °C was added
tert-butyllithium (0.4 mL, 1.7 M in THF, 0.56 mmol, 2.1
equiv) in one portion under nitrogen atmosphere. The
reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to room
Synlett 2003, No. 2, 241–243 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York