N. Mir, M. Salavati-Niasari / Materials Research Bulletin 48 (2013) 1660–1667
1667
Table 2
Influence of different amines on the size and shape of TiO2 products.
Amine t
Amine type
Products
Shape of particles
Approximate size of particles (nm)
Ref.
Diethylenetriamine (DETA)
Diethylamine (DEA)
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Primary
Tertiary
Rod
200 ꢁ 20
70 ꢁ 40
[27]
[27]
[27]
[54]
Ellipsoid
Ellipsoid
Tube
Trimethylamine (TMA))
Dodecanediamine (DDA)
Tripodal tetraamine (L3)
200 ꢁ 100
30–60
Ellipsoid
30 ꢁ 20
This work
[13] T. Sugimoto, K. Okada, H. Itoh, Synthetic of uniform spindle-type titania particles
by the gel–sol method, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 193 (1997) 140–143.
[14] S. Lee, I.-S. Cho, J.H. Lee, D.H. Kim, D.W. Kim, J.Y. Kim, H. Shin, J.-K. Lee, H.S. Jung,
N.-G. Park, K. Kim, M.J. Ko, K.S. Hong, Chem. Mater. 22 (2010) 1958–1965.
[15] C.-H. Liao, W.-T. Shih, C.-C. Chen, Y.-L. Lee, P.-L. Kuo, Thin Solid Films 519 (2011)
5552–5557.
[16] J. Wu, X. Lu, L. Zhang, Y. Xia, F. Huang, F. Xu, J. Alloy Compd. 496 (2010) 234–240.
[17] H. Lin, C.P. Huang, W. Li, C. Ni, S. Ismat Shah, Y.H. Tseng, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 68
(2006) 1–11.
TCO layer in DSSCs, to rule out the effect of the compact layer on
the reflectance, transmittance, and finally, cell performance.
The higher value of photovoltaic parameters for S3-based
sample is mainly attributed to the enhanced scattering properties
and appropriate band gap of the sample. Comparing S1 and S2
samples shows that the S1-based DSSC gives higher Isc value which
can be attributed to the higher surface area and absorbed dye
amount due to the smaller agglomeration size.
ˇ
ˇ´
´
ˇ
´
´
´
´
[18] K. Kocı, L. Obalova, L. Matejova, D. Placha, Z. Lacny, J. Jirkovsky’, O. Solcova, Appl.
Catal. B: Environ. 89 (2009) 494–502.
[19] E.Y. Kim, H. Choi, C.M. Whang, J. Mater. Sci. 45 (2010) 3895–3900.
[20] S.K. Das, M.K. Bhunia, A. Bhaumik, Dalton Trans. 39 (2010) 4382–4390.
[21] D.L. Liao, G.S. Wu, B.Q. Liao, Colloid Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 348 (2009)
270–275.
[22] J. Chandradassa, M. Balasubramanianb, K. Hyeon Kim, J. Alloys Compd. 506 (2010)
395–399.
[23] M. Salavati-Niasari, N. Mir, F. Davar, J. Alloys Compd. 493 (2010) 163–168.
[24] M. Salavati-Niasari, N. Mir, F. Davar, Polyhedron 28 (2009) 1111–1114.
[25] M. Salavati-Niasari, N. Mir, F. Davar, Inorg. Chim. Acta 363 (2010) 1719–1726.
[26] F. Davar, M. Salavati-Niasari, N. Mir, K. Saberyan, M. Monemzadeh, E. Ahmadi,
Polyhedron 29 (2010) 1747.
[27] T. Sugimoto, X. Zhou, A. Muramatsu, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 259 (2003) 53–61.
[28] M. Froba, O. Muth, A. Relier, Solid State Ionics 101–103 (1997) 249–253.
[29] T. Nishide, F. Mizukami, Thin Solid Films 353 (1999) 67–71.
[30] Z. Hens, I. Moreels, B. Fritzinger, J.C. Martins, Comprehensive Nanoscience and
Technology 5 (2011) 21–49.
[31] D.F. Cook, D. Cummins, E.D. McKenzie, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (1976) 1369–
1375.
[32] D. Moon, M. Soo Lah, R.E. Del Sesto, J.S. Miller, Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002) 4708–4714.
[33] A.G. Blackman, Polyhedron 24 (2005) 1–39.
[34] S. Mandal, D.K. Seth, P. Gupta, Polyhedron 31 (2012) 167–175.
[35] M. Forcato, F. Lake, M.M. Blazquez, P. Renner, M. Crisma, L.H. Gade, G. Licini, C.
Moberg, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2006) 1032–1040.
[36] Y. Hasegawa, S. Saitou, D. Nagaoka, H. Yajima, M. Kanesato, J. All. Compd. 451
(2008) 320–324.
5. Conclusions
In summary, TiO2 nanoparticles of different sizes and agglom-
eration levels were synthesized by applying three tripodal
tetraamines with different symmetries. It was shown that the
3D structure and the symmetry of the complexing agent have a
crucial role on the morphology of products. The ligands with lower
steric hindrance result in smaller agglomeration size of the
nanoparticles. It was shown that for better photovoltaic properties
of DSSC it is beneficial to have small particle size on one hand and
high agglomeration level on the other hand in order to benefit both
high surface area and enhanced scattering ability. In this study,
employing the L3 ligand containing indole group gave rise to the
higher scattering properties of prepared TiO2 sample and the
conversion efficiency has increased 20% relative to nanoparticles
prepared from L1 ligand with phenolic group. Interestingly, by
changing the complexing agent from L2 to L1 with only different
numbers of hydroxyl groups, the conversion efficiency of TiO2
nanoparticles was enhanced by 43%. It is noteworthy that in order
to determine the exact chemical and spacial role of various head
groups on controlling the particle size of TiO2 products, further
mechanistic works are under way.
[37] M. Nath, P.K. Saini, A. Kumar, J. Organomet. Chem. 695 (2010) 1353–1362.
´
¨
[38] S. Ito, P. Chen, P. Comte, M.K. Nazeeruddin, P. Liska, P. Pechy, M. Gratzel, Prog.
Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 15 (2007) 603–612.
[39] H.P. Klug, L.F. Alexander, X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and
Amorphous Materials, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons Press, Inc., New York, 1954, pp.
716.
[40] T.-L. Yang, W.-W. Qin, Spectrochim. Acta A 67 (2007) 568–571.
[41] V. Arjunana, N. Puviarasanb, S. Mohan, Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spec-
trosc. 64 (2006) 233–239.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to University of Kashan for supporting
this work by Grant No (159271/16).
[42] V. Saheb, I. Sheikhshoaie, Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. Spectro-
chim. Acta Part A 81 (2011) 144–150.
[43] S. Sivakumar, P.K. Pillai, P. Mukundan, K.G.K. Warrier, Mater. Lett. 57 (2002) 330–
335.
[44] V.S. Smitha, K.A. Manjumol, K.V. Baiju, S. Ghosh, P. Perumal, K.G.K. Warrier, Sol–
Gel Sci. Technol. 54 (2010) 203–211.
References
[1] B. O’Regan, M. Gratzel, Nature 353 (1991) 737–740.
[2] J. Fu, Mater. Lett. 68 (2012) 419–422.
[3] L.L. Wang, X.M. Wu, S.C. Zhang, Appl. Mech. Mater. 1281 (2011) 130–134.
[4] M.-H. Seo, M. Yuasa, T. Kida, J.-S. Huh, K. Shimanoe, N. Yamazoe, Sensor Actuat. B
137 (2009) 513–520.
[45] P.D. Cozzoli, A. Kornowski, H. Weller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 14539–21448.
[46] J. Liu, Y. Wang, D. Sun, Renewable Energy 38 (2012) 214–218.
[47] J. Tauc, R. Grigorovici, A. Vancu, Phys. Status Solidi b 15 (1966) 627–637.
[48] M. Hidalgo, M. Aguilar, M. Maicu, J. Navio, G. Colon, Catal. Today 129 (2007) 50–
58.
[5] A. Yella, H.-W. Lee, H.N. Tsao, C. Yi, A.K. Chandiran, M.K. Nazeeruddin, E.W.-G.
Diau, C.-Y. Yeh, S.M. Zakeeruddin, M. Gratzel, Science 334 (2011) 629–634.
[6] X. Chen, S.S. Mao, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 2891–2959.
[7] H.S. Jung, H. Shin, J.R. Kim, J.Y. Kim, K.S. Hong, J.K. Lee, Langmuir 20 (2004) 11732.
[8] P.-T. Hsiao, M.-D. Lu, Y.-L. Tung, H. Teng, J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (2010) 15625–
15632.
[49] F. Hossain, L. Sheppard, J. Nowotny, G. Murch, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69 (2008)
1820–1828.
[50] S. Agarwala, M. Kevin, A.S.W. Wong, C.K.N. Peh, V. Thavasi, G.W. Ho, ACS Appl.
Mater. Interfaces 2 (2010) 1844–1850.
[51] Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, P. Wang, G. Yang, Q. Sun, J. Zheng, Y. Zhu, Mater. Chem. Phys.
123 (2010) 595–600.
[9] S.S. Hong, M.S. Lee, S.S. Park, G.D. Lee, Catal. Today 87 (2003) 99–105.
[10] K.T. Lim, H.S. Hwang, S.S. Hong, C. Park, W. Ryoo, K.P. Johnston, Stud. Surf. Sci.
Catal. 153 (2004) 569–572.
[11] P.E. Meskin, V.K. Ivanov, A.E. Barantchikov, B.R. Churagulov, Y.D. Tretyakov,
Ultrason. Sonochem. 13 (2006) 47–53.
[52] H.J. Koo, Y.J. Kim, Y.H. Lee, W.I. Lee, K. Kim, N.G. Park, Adv. Mater. 20 (2008) 195–
199.
[53] Z.S. Wang, H. Kawauchi, T. Kashima, H. Arakawa, Coord. Chem. Rev. 248 (2004)
1381–1389.
[54] W. Fumin, S. Zhansheng, G. Feng, J. Jinting, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 15 (2007) 754–759.
[12] E. Gressel-Michel, D. Chaumont, D. Stuerga, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 285 (2005)
674–679.