alternative to the syntheses of thiazoles, because the orga-
nosulfanyl and organoselanyl acetylenes can easily react with
both nucleophiles and electrophiles.8 As a preliminary step,
we carried out the scandium-catalyzed reactions of the
3-selanylpropargyl alcohol and thiobenzamide give the
cycloadducts; the regioselectivity and the positioning of
between the nitrogen and sulfur atoms were determined by
the X-ray analysis. The crystal data confirmed 4-(p-bro-
mobenzyl)-2-phenyl-5-(phenylselanyl)thiazole (Figure 1).
Table 1. Discovering Reaction Conditions for
Scandium-Catalyzed Preparations of
4-(4-Methoxybenzyl)thiazole 2a
entry
conditiona
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MeNO2, rt, 1 h
19
52
14
62
34
47
46
94
MeNO2, reflux, 10 min
Bu4NHSO4 (0.2 equiv), MeNO2, reflux, 10 min
Bu4NHSO4 (0.2 equiv), MeNO2, reflux, 10 min
Bu4NHSO4 (0.5 equiv), MeNO2, reflux, 10 min
Bu4NCl (0.2 equiv), MeNO2, reflux, 10 min
Bu4NBr (0.2 equiv), MeNO2, reflux, 10 min
Bu4NHSO4 (0.2 equiv), MeNO2-H2O (10:1),
reflux, 10 min
9
DBU (0.1 equiv), MeNO2-H2O (10:1),
-
reflux, 10 min
10
11
Bu4NBF4 (0.2 equiv), MeNO2-H2O (10:1),
reflux, 10 min
48
93
Bu4NHSO4 (0.2 equiv), MeNO2-H2O (5:1),
reflux, 10 min
a Five mol % of scandium triflate was used except in entry 3.
reaction temperature increased the yields (entries 1-2); the
additives, such as ammonium salts, gave the desired product
in good yields (entries 3-8, 10-11); the addition of water
as a cosolvent increased the yield considerably (entries
8-11). The use of DBU as an additive decreased the yield
of the product (entry 9). The use of scandium triflate (5 mol
%), MeNO2-H2O (10:1), Bu4NHSO4 (10 mol %) under
reflux conditions provided the best yield of this product 2a
(entry 8).
Next, we examined the reaction on the various intermedi-
ates bearing the phenylsulfanyl group under the reaction
conditions of both method A and B. Most of the reactions
carried out using method B (MeNO2/H2O ) 10:1) resulted
in the formation of 2-phenyl and 2-methyltriazoles 2 and 3.
Note that the reaction of 2-thienyl derivative 1g with
thioacetamide gave a mixture of both 2-methyl-5-(phenyl-
sulfanyl)-4-(2-thienylmethyl)thiazole and 2-methyl-4-(phe-
nylsulfanyl)-5-(2-thienylmethyl)thiazole; however, the prod-
uct by method B gave 2-methyl-5-(phenylsulfanyl)-4-(2-
thienylmethyl)thiazole 3g (Table 2, entry 9).
Figure 1. ORTEP drawing of 4-p-bromobenzyl-2-phenyl-5-phe-
nylselanylthiazole.
This is a surprising result in that the thiazole was formed
from the cycloaddition of the R-phenylselanylpropadienyl
cation, not the 3-selanylpropargyl cation. The thiazoles from
3-bromoalk-1-ynes and thioamides are usually obtained
through the cycloaddition of propargylic sulfinamide.9 This
unprecedented result would offer a new strategy for the
preparations of thiazoles. Herein, we report the scandium-
catalyzed generation and cycloaddition of the R-sulfanyl and
R-selanyl propadienyl cations with thioamides under opti-
mized phase transfer conditions.
In our initial study, 1-p-methoxyphenyl-3-(phenylsulfa-
nyl)prop-2-yn-1-ol (1a) was reacted with thiobenzamide
under a variety of conditions (Table 1). This led to the fol-
lowing conclusions: scandium triflate in nitomethane
(MeNO2) afforded the product 2a and an increase in the
The phenylselanylpropargyl alcohols 4 with thioamides
were also investigated under the same conditions (Method
B). We successively carried out the deselanylation of the
cycloadducts using MeLi and obtained the thiazoles 5, 6 and
the selenazoles 7 in good to excellent yields (Table 3).
Scheme 1 depicts a catalytic cycle for the thiazole
cycloaddition, which involves in situ generation of the
R-selanyl propadienyl cation as a reactive species. The
propargyl cation 10 is generated from scandium-catalyzed
activation and dehydroxylation of the alcohol 8. Because of
the high number of nucleophilicities, the carbon nucleophiles
attack the propargyl cation to form the propargylated
products.5 However, nucleophilicity of thioamides is weaker,
and therefore, the propargyl cation would isomerize to the
(6) (a) Nicholas, K. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 207, and references
therein. (b) Caffyn, A. J. M.; Nicholas, K. M. In ComprehensiVe Organo-
metallic Chemistry II; Abel, E. W., Stone, F. G. A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.;
Pergamon: New York, 1995; Vol. 12, Chapter 7.1. (c) Caffyn, A. J. M.;
Nicholas, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6438.
(7) (a) Nishibayashi, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Inada, Y.; Hidai, M.; Uemura,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11846. (b) Nishibayashi, Y.; Inada, Y.;
Hidai, M.; Uemura, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7900. (c) Inada, Y.;
Nishibayashi, Y.; Hidai, M.; Uemura, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
15172. (d) Nishibayashi, Y.; Shinida, A.; Miyake, Y.; Matsuzawa, H.; Sato,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4835.
(8) (a) Godoi, B.; Speranca, A.; Back, D. F.; Brandao, R.; Nogueira,
C. W.; Zeni, G. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3469, and references therein. (b)
Yoshimatsu, M.; Naito, M.; Shimizu, H.; Muraoka, O.; Tanabe, G.; Kataoka,
T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8200. (c) Yoshimatsu, M.; Machida, K.; Fuseya,
T.; Shimizu, H.; Kataoka, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 1839.
(9) Beyerstedt, F.; Mcelvain, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 2266.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 13, 2009
2953