Article
Organometallics, Vol. 28, No. 13, 2009 3867
donation of the s lone pair of the hydrogen anion to the
vacant Zn level (97.6% s, 1.8% p, 0.2% d). The natural
charge of Zn is 1.44 e, thus being 0.60 e more positive than
in 1.5 Each bridging hydrogen atom bears a natural charge
of -0.63 e, compensating the decrease in the metal electron
density and providing a more ionic character of the bonding
between the (dpp-BIAN)ZnH monomers in 4 than between
the (dpp-BIAN)Zn monomers in 1.
Experimental Section
General Remarks. Compounds 3, 4, and 5 are sensitive to air
and moisture. Therefore all manipulations concerning their
preparation and identification were carried out under vacuum
using Schlenk techniques. The solvents THF, diethyl ether,
benzene, and toluene were dried by distillation from sodium/
benzophenon. THF-d8 (Aldrich) used for the NMR measure-
ments was dried with sodium/benzophenone at ambient tem-
perature just prior to use and was condensed under vacuum into
the NMR tube already containing the sample. The IR spectra
were recorded on a FSM-1201 spectrometer; the 1H NMR
spectra, on a Bruker DPX-200 NMR spectrometer. The ESR
spectra were obtained using a Bruker EMX instrument
equipped with an ER 041X microwave bridge.
Figure 4. HOMO, HOMO-1, and HOMO-11 R orbitals of 4
from DFT calculation.
that the coordination of the ethynyl ligands is less sym-
metric in 3 than in [{(TMEDA)Na(CtCPh)2Zn(tBu)}2]. In
[{(TMEDA)Li(CtCPh)2Zn(tBu)}2(TMEDA)],19 in which
two phenylethynyl groups bridge a zinc and a lithium atom,
the two Zn-C(tCPh) bonds show nearly the same length
˚
(2.0495(18) and 2.0738(18) A), whereas the bond angles Zn-
CtC(Ph) correspond with those in 3 (Zn-CtC 173.64(15)ꢀ
and 105.37(16)ꢀ).
Like the molecules of 3, the molecules of 4 show different
Synthesis of [(dpp-BIAN)Zn(μ-CtCPh)]2 (3). Method A. To a
solution of 1 (0.54 g, 0.48 mmol) in THF (30 mL) was added
phenylacetylene (0.10 g, 0.960 mmol). During 48 h of reflux the
color of the reaction mixture changed from gold-red to cherry-
red. The solid that remained after evaporation of the solvent
under vacuum was crystallized from benzene, giving red crystals
of 3. Yield: 0.19 g (27%). Mp > 257 ꢀC (dec). Anal. Found (%):
C 80.31, H 7.20. Calcd for C100H102N4Zn2 (1490.60 g/mol) (%):
C 80.58, H 6.90. IR (Nujol): 3058 w, 3031 w, 2089 m, 1808 w,
1596 w, 1534 s, 1361 m, 1319 s, 1254 m, 1184 m, 1157 w, 1146 w,
1107 w, 1080 w, 1057 w, 1038 w, 1011 w, 961 w, 946 w, 934 w,
865 m, 819 m, 803 m, 784 m, 761 s, 592 w, 534 m, 453 m,
411 s cm-1. Method B. To a solution of compound 5 (0.67 g,
1 mmol) in THF (40 mL) was added benzophenone (0.09 g,
0.5 mmol). In the course of 20 h reflux, the mixture changed
color from deep blue to cherry-red. Then the solvent was
evaporated under vacuum. Crystallization of the residual solid
from benzene gave red crystals of 3. Yield: 0.25 g (34%).
Synthesis of [(dpp-BIAN)Zn(μ-H)]2 (4). To a solution of 2
(prepared from 0.5 g (1 mmol) of dpp-BIAN,5 0.13 g (0.5 mmol)
of iodine, and an excess of the granulated zinc in THF (30 mL))
was added potassium hydride (0.04 g, 1 mmol). In the course of
18 h stirring of the mixture at room temperature its color
changed from cherry-red to red-brown. After evaporation of
the solvent under vacuum the residue was dissolved in toluene
(30 mL) and filtered off from precipitated KI. Reduction in the
volume of the solution and cooling caused precipitation of 0.44 g
(67%) of 4 as red-brown crystals. Mp > 263 ꢀC (dec). Anal.
Found (%): C 78.08, H 7.81. Calcd for C86H98N4Zn2 (1318.42 g/
mol): C 78.35, H 7.49. IR (Nujol): 1534 s, 1318 m, 1257 m,
1184 m, 1154 w, 1103 w, 1080 m, 1057 m, 1034 w, 934 m, 864 w,
distances between the zinc atoms and the bridging ligands
˚
(Zn(1)-H(1) 1.88(3) and Zn(1)-H(1a) 1.67(3) A). In the
other two hydrogen-bridged binuclear zinc complexes
known so far, Ar0Zn(μ-H)2ZnAr0 (Ar0 = C6H3-2,6-(C6H3-
4
˚
2,6-iPr2)2); Zn-H (1.67(2) and 1.79(3) A) and [{HC(CMe-
NAr)2}Zn(μ-H)]2 (Ar=2,6-Me2C6H3);20 Zn-H (1.766 A),
˚
the difference in the length of the Zn-H bonds is consider-
ably smaller or even zero. The Zn-H bonds in 4 are
also remarkably longer than the terminal Zn-H bonds in
21
˚
[Me2N(CH2)2N(Me)ZnH]2 (1.62 A) or [(Me3PN)ZnH]4
(1.50 A).22 Due to the small ionic radius of the hydride ion,
˚
˚
the Zn Zn separation in 4 (2.4785(6) A) is smaller than in 3
3 3 3
˚
(2.7816(3) A). However, both distances exceed the range of
6
˚
direct zinc-zinc bonds (2.29-2.40 A).
The electronic structure of 4 was examined by DFT23
calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G* level using the molecule
with unsubstituted phenyl fragments as a model system.
Recently, we used such calculations to study the Zn-Zn
bonding in 1.5 The triplet ground-state configuration of 4 is
11.0 kcal mol-1 more stable than the lowest singlet state,
which agrees well with the ESR data obtained for 4. The key
MOs of 4 are depicted in Figure 4. Like in 1, the two highest
semi-occupied MOs of the triplet system of 4 are localized on
the dpp-BIAN ligands, but in contrast to 1 (HOMO and
HOMO-1; -3.95 eV), in 4 these MOs are not degenerate
(HOMO, -3.89 and HOMO-1, -4.08 eV). The R HOMO
and HOMO-1 in 4 are mainly localized on the atoms of the
diimine fragments and partially on the bridging hydrogen
atoms. The degenerate R HOMO-11 and HOMO-12
(-6.75 eV) are responsible for the Zn-H-Zn bonding.
According to the natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis, the
covalent contribution to the Zn-H bonding arises from the
819 m, 799 c, 757 s, 692 m, 668 w, 634 m, 542 m cm-1
.
[dpp-BIAN(H)]Zn(CtCPh) (5). To a solution of Na2(dpp-
BIAN) (freshly prepared from 0.046 g (1 mmol) of Na and 0.5 g
(1 mmol) of dpp-BIAN in Et2O (30 mL)) was added phenyla-
cetylene (0.102 g, 1 mmol). The color of the reaction mixture
changed instantly from deep green to deep blue. To this mixture
was added a solution of ZnI2 (prepared prior to use from excess
zinc metal and iodine (0.254 g, 1 mmol) in Et2O (20 mL)), and
the NaI formed was filtered off. In the course of 1 day, 5 (0.73 g,
86%) separates from the mother liquor as deep blue crystals.
Mp>275 ꢀC (dec). Anal. Found (%): C 75.92, H 7.88. Calcd for
C54H71N2ZnO2 (845.55 g/mol): C 76.71, H 8.46. IR (Nujol):
3258 w, 3054 w, 2096 m, 1931 w, 1804 w, 1673 w, 1589 m, 1519 s,
1362 m, 1319 m, 1258 s, 1185 m, 1108 m, 1058 m, 1039 w, 1008 w,
(20) Hao, H.; Cui, C.; Roesky, H. W.; Bai, G.; Schmidt, H.-G.;
Noltemeyer, M. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1118.
(21) Bell, N. A.; Moseley, P. T.; Shearer, H. M. M.; Spencer, C. B.
Chem. Commun. 1980, 359.
(22) Krieger, M.; Neumueller, B.; Dehnicke, K. Z. Anorg. Allg.
Chem. 1998, 624, 1563.
(23) The geometry optimization, single-point calculation, and NBO
analysis were performed using the Gaussian 03 package (see Supporting
Information).