Table 2. Comparison of Ligandsa
.
path selectivitiese
entry
ligand
% yield 3a+4ab
3a:4ac
% ee of 3ad
% ee of 4ad
I:II
a:b
a′:b′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(S,S,S)-5
(R)-6
(R,S,S)-5
(S,S)-7
(S)-8
(S)-9
(S)-10
(R,R)-11
92
76
96
90
71
70
83
51
67:33
54:46
55:45
60:40
46:54
46:54
55:45
69:31
75
89
-36
28
67
58
32
70
-26
12
48
42
70:30
58:42
46:54
56:44
52:48
52:48
47:53
32:68
84:16
88:12
38:62
69:31
73:27
70:30
69:31
39:61
72:28
93:7
31:69
51:49
84:16
80:20
58:42
17:83
18
-64
36
-26
a Pd(dba)2 (3 mol %), ligand (3 mol %), 1 (0.2 mmol), and 2a (0.3 mmol) were reacted in toluene (0.1 mL) at 50 °C for 18-50 h. b GC yield based on 1.
c Determined by GC. d Determined after conversion to the corresponding ꢀ-silyl ketones that were analyzed by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase column.
A negative value means major formation of the other enantiomer. e Calculated from the product distribution. See Scheme 1 and the Supporting Information.
(S)-9, and (S)-10 gave inferior results in terms of primary
resolution (I:II ) 47:53-56:44) as well as secondary
resolution (a:b and a′:b′ ) ca. 5:5-8:2) (entries 3-7). It
should be noted that TADDOL-derived (R,R)-11 gave
product selectivity comparable with (S,S,S)-5, despite low
product yield (entry 8).
Various racemic MCPs 2 were subjected to the kinetic
resolution using the Pd/(S,S,S)-5 catalyst at 20 °C (Table
3). Selective formation of 3b (90% ee) was realized with
high total yield (97%, 3b:4b ) 80:20) (entry 1). The reaction
of 2c-e bearing siloxyalkyl and acetoxypropyl groups also
gave 3c-e with 90-92% ee’s in high yields with good
product selectivity (entries 2-4). Products 3f (87% ee) and
Our kinetic resolution system may be regarded as a unique
parallel kinetic resolution system7 in which the total ef-
ficiency of the kinetic resolution also relies on the reactivity
difference between the enantiomeric reactants.8 It suggests
that even if each of the two chiral discriminations is not very
effective, their synergism in the catalytic cycle affords high
enantioselectivity.9
It was interesting to compare the characteristic catalyst
ability of Pd/(S,S,S)-5 with that of several other palladium
catalysts (Table 2). To enable comparison with some less
active catalysts, the reactions were carried out at 50 °C with
1.5 equiv of 2a. The reaction with Pd/(S,S,S)-5 catalyst gave
3a and 4a in a ratio of 67:33, with 75% and 32% ee,
respectively, indicating good path selectivities (I:II ) 70:
30, a:b ) 84:16, a′:b′ ) 72:28) (entry 1). Very different
results were obtained for the reaction with Pd/(R)-6, which
was the most effective catalyst for the asymmetric desym-
metrization of meso-MCPs (entry 2).4 Although the reaction
afforded 3a and 4a in a ratio of almost 1:1, the ee’s of the
products were 89 and 70%, respectively, indicating that the
(R)-6-based catalyst is more selective in the ꢀ-carbon elimination
step (a:b, a′:b′) but less selective in the primary stereodiscrimination
(I:II). Palladium catalysts bearing (R,S,S)-5, (S,S)-7, (S)-8,
Table 3. Kinetic Resolution of rac-2 via Pd/(S,S,S)-5-Catalyzed
Silaborative C-C Cleavagea
.
% yield
(3 + 4)b 3:4c
% ee of
3d
entry
2
(7) In this paper, we used the term “parallel kinetic resolution” for the
reaction in which each enantiomer of racemic substrate was separately
converted into constitutional isomers.
1
2
3
4
5
6
2b [R ) (CH2)2Ph]
97e
85e
97e
71e
69h
84
80:20 90f (3b)
86:14 92 (3c)
77:23g 90 (3d)
80:20 90 (3e)
77:23 87 (3f)
81:19 85 (3g)
2c [R ) CH2OSiMe2(t-Bu)]
2d [R ) (CH2)3OSiMe2(t-Bu)]
2e [R ) (CH2)2OAc]
(8) Examples of parallel kinetic resolution using chiral transition-metal
catalyst : (a) Hayashi, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Ito, Y. Chem. Lett. 1987, 177.
(b) Martin, S. F.; Spaller, M. R.; Liras, S.; Hartmann, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 4493. (c) Visser, M. S.; Hoveyda, A. H. Tetrahedron 1995,
51, 4383. (d) Doyle, M. P.; Dyatkin, A. B.; Kalinin, A. V.; Ruppar, D. A.;
Martin, S. F.; Spaller, M. R.; Liras, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11021.
(e) Bolm, C.; Schlingloff, G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 1247.
(f) Bertozzi, F.; Crotti, P.; Macchia, F.; Pineschi, M.; Feringa, B. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 930. (g) Tanaka, K.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 8078. (h) Pineschi, M.; Moro, F. D.; Crotti, P.; Bussolo, V. D.;
Macchia, F. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2099. (i) Tanaka, K.; Hagiwara, Y.;
Hirano, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2734. (j) Gansa¨uer, A.; Fan,
C.-A.; Keller, F.; Keil, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3484. (k) Kumar,
C.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6542. (l) Webster, R.;
Bo¨ing, C.; Lautens, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 444.
2f [R ) (CH2)3Cl]
2g [R ) (CH2)2N(phthaloyl)]
a Pd(dba)2 (5 mol %), (S,S,S)-5 (5 mol %), 1 (0.2 mmol), and 2 (0.6
mmol) were reacted in toluene (0.1 mL) at 20 °C for 72-99 h. b Isolated
yield. c Determined by GC. d Determined after conversion to the corre-
sponding ꢀ-silyl ketones that were analyzed by HPLC with a chiral
stationary-phase column. The ee’s of 4 were 6-55%. e Containing dba
(<5%) as inseparable impurity. f Determined by direct analysis of 3b.
g
Determined by H NMR. h Yield after conversion to the ꢀ-silyl ketone.
1
2882
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 13, 2009