312
G. Wang et al.
Letter
Synlett
mechanism to this transformation. In addition, we cannot
give a reasonable explanation to illustrate the difference be-
tween EDC·HCl and DCC in this transformation process.
References and Notes
(1) (a) Ressler, C.; Nigam, S. N.; Giza, Y.-H.; Nelson, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1963, 85, 3311. (b) Ikegami, F.; Murakoshi, I. Phytochemis-
try 1994, 35, 1089. (c) Roy, D. N.; Sabri, M. I.; Kayton, R. J.;
Spencer, P. S. Nat. Toxins 1996, 4, 247.
BnO
N
O
(2) (a) Tschiersch, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1964, 747. (b) Ressler, C.;
Koga, T. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Enzymol. 1971, 242, 473.
(3) (a) Jao, S.-C.; Chen, J.; Yang, K.; Li, W.-S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006,
14, 304. (b) Asimakopoulou, A.; Panopoulos, P.; Chasapis, C. T.;
Coletta, C.; Zhou, Z.; Cirino, G.; Giannis, A.; Szabo, C.; Spyroulias,
G. A.; Papapetropoulos, A. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 169, 922.
(4) (a) Ressler, C.; Redstone, P. A.; Erenberg, R. H. Science 1961, 134,
188. (b) Ressler, C.; Nelson, J.; Pfeffer, M. Nature (London, U.K.)
1964, 203, 1286. (c) Hatzfeld, Y.; Maruyama, A.; Schmidt, A.;
Noji, M.; Ishizawa, K.; Saito, K. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123 1163.
(d) Watanabe, M.; Kusano, M.; Oikawa, A.; Fukushima, A.; Noji,
M.; Saito, K. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 310.
O
O
dehydrating agent
CH2Cl2, r.t., 12 h
HO
8a
+
(1)
NH2
+
BnOH
O
O
BnO
7
2a
NH2
8b
dehydrating agent = EDC.HCl DMAP, 8a, 95%; 8b, 0%
dehydrating agent = DCC DMAP, 8a, 0%; 8b, 95%
NHBoc
BnO
N
NHBoc
O
O
10a
+
(5) (a) Ressler, C.; Giza, Y.-H.; Nigam, S. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963,
85, 2874. (b) Piotrowski, M.; Volmer, J. J. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006,
61, 111.
dehydrating agent
CH2Cl2, r.t., 12 h
HO
NH2
(2)
+
BnOH
NHBoc
O
O
BnO
NH2
(6) Warriow, A. G. S.; Hawkerford, M. J. J. Exp. Bot. 1998, 49, 1625.
(7) (a) Ressler, C.; Ratzin, H. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3356.
(b) Ornstein, P. L.; Arnold, M. B.; Evrard, D. B.; Leander, J. D.;
Lodge, D.; Schoepp, D. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 43.
(c) Saednya, A. Synthesis 1985, 184. (d) Imamoto, T.; Takaota, T.;
Yokoyma, M. Synthesis 1983, 142. (e) Yokoyma, M.; Yoshida, S.;
Imamoto, T. Synthesis 1982, 591. (f) Olah, G. A.; Narang, S. C.;
Fung, A. P.; Gupta, B. G. B. Synthesis 1980, 657. (g) Barger, T. M.;
Riley, C. M. Synth. Commun. 1980, 10, 479. (h) Pesson, M. Bull.
Soc. Chim. Fr. 1965, 2262. (i) Krynistsky, J. A.; Carhart, H. W. Org.
Synth. Coll. IV 1963, 436. (j) Rhee, J.; Lim, J.; Im, W. Bull. Korean
Chem. Soc. 1993, 14, 301. (k) Christie, B. D.; Rapoport, H. J. Org.
Chem. 1985, 50, 1239. (l) Campatna, F.; Carroti, A.; Casini, G. Tet-
rahedron Lett. 1977, 1813. (m) Claremon, D. A.; Phillips, B. T. Tet-
rahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2155.
(8) (a) Sheehan, J.; Cruickshank, P.; Boshart, G. J. Org. Chem. 1961,
26, 2525. (b) Wang, T. P.; Ko, N. N.; Su, Y. C.; Wang, N. C.;
Severance, S.; Hwang, C. C.; Shih, Y. Y.; Wu, M.; Chen, Y. H. Bio-
conjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 2417. (c) Wang, G.; Chen, L.; Xian, T.;
Liang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Z.; Luo, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014,
12, 8048.
(9) Nakajima, N.; Ikada, Y. Bioconjugate Chem. 1995, 6, 123.
(10) General Procedures for the Synthesis of β-Cyano-L-Alanine
Esters and Amides
9
2a
O
10b
dehydrating agent = EDC.HCl DMAP, 10a, 55%; 10b, 40%
dehydrating agent = DCC DMAP, 10a, 50%; 10b, 40%
BocHN
BnO
O
NHBoc
EDC.HCl/DMAP
CH2Cl2, r.t., 12 h
BnO
(3)
N
NH2
O
O
4a, 0%
3a
Scheme 6 Control experiments
In summary, we have developed a novel, mild, efficient,
and scalable protocol for the synthesis of N-protected β-cy-
ano-L-alanine derivatives from N-protected L-asparagin.
This protocol avoided the use of toxic or unpleasant re-
agents and was easy to operate in laboratory. Hence, this
protocol may serve as an attractive alternative for the
preparation of β-cyano-L-alanine ester or amide from L-as-
paragin to the existing methods. In addition, we have
demonstrated for the first time that EDC·HCl and DCC are
different during the formation of an ester bond involving
L-asparagin, though we knew that EDC·HCl and DCC as de-
hydrate reagents can replace each other in peptide synthe-
sis. Further studies to elucidate this specific transformation
mechanism are currently under way in our laboratory.
To a stirred solution of N-protected L-asparagin 1a–c (0.10
mmol) and alcohol or amine 2a–n (0.12 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10
mL), EDC·HCl (0.30 mmol), and DMAP (0.02 mmol) were added
at 0 °C. This reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at r.t. Then the
reaction mixture was poured in H2O (10 mL) and extracted with
CH2Cl2 (20 mL). The organic phase was separated, dried, and
subjected to flash column chromatography (EtOAc–hexane, 1:
4) to afford the desired compounds as white solids.
Acknowledgment
(11) Selected Spectral Data for Compound Benzyl 2-[(tert-Butoxy-
carbonyl)amino]-3-cyanopropanoate (4a)
The work was supported financially by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grants 81161120401) to Guoxin Wang. We also
thank the Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan Project (Grant No.
ZDSY20130331145112855) for funding.
Yield: 288 mg (95%); white crystals, mp 131–133 °C. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.45–7.35 (m, 5 H, ArH), 5.55 (d, J = 6.6
Hz, 1 H, NH), 5.26 (s, 2 H, CH2), 4.55–4.51 (m, 1 H, COCH), 3.00–
2.89 (m, 2 H, CH2CN), 1.47 [s, 9 H, OC(CH3)3]. 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3): δ = 169.13, 155.05, 134.74, 116.54, 81.06, 68.40, 50.53,
Supporting Information
28.36, 21.78. ESI-HRMS: m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C16H20N2O4
+
Na: 327.1321; found: 327.1309.
Supporting information for this article is available online at
S
u
p
p
ortiInfogrmoaitn
S
u
p
p
ortioInfgrmoaitn
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York — Synlett 2016, 27, 309–312