Photoaffinity Labeling via Nitrenium Ion Chemistry
A R T I C L E S
in various solvents at excitation wavelengths of 420, 350, and 305
nm. The white-light continuum generated by focusing a small
portion of the 800 nm amplified output into a 3 mm CaF2 window
was used as a probe light source. Alternatively, for the 305 pump,
a portion of the 800 nm amplified output was delivered to the
TOPAS-C probe amplifier to produce UV-probe pulses tunable from
280 to 390 nm. In a typical ultrafast measurement, about 120 ∆A
data points were collected at each position of the delay line, and
this procedure was repeated about 10 times for averaging. All
transient absorption (∆A) spectra were corrected for the group
velocity dispersion of the probe light with an accuracy of (30 fs
by using the nonresonant or two-photon absorption signals from
neat solvent.9 The excitation pulse energy was attenuated to ensure
that the ∆A signal due to two (excitation)-photon absorption by
the solvent was minor compared with the single-photon ∆A signal
of the azide at delay times equal to or longer than 100 fs.10 The
sharp Gaussian transient absorption signal at time zero due to
stimulated Raman scattering from solvent11 yielded the instrument
response function (150 fs, fwhm). Linearity of the transient
absorption signals from the azide was verified by attenuating the
excitation light with neutral density filters up to one-fourth of the
typically used pulse energy; the extrapolated line passed through
the origin. Dissolved oxygen had no noticeable effect on the
transient absorption spectra as verified by degassing the azide
solution with argon (solvent, i-PrOH). The ∆A spectra (solvent,
i-PrOH, 350 nm excitation) were found to be independent of azide
concentration (up to 16 mM). Steady-state absorption spectra of
the azide solutions measured before and after the pump-probe
experiment indicated that the degree of the sample decomposition
was always less than 10%. All measurements are performed at
magic angle polarization conditions and 22 °C.8
(B3LYP)15 methodology and using second-order couple cluster
method with resolution-of-identity approximation (RI-CC2)16 with
triple-ꢀ valence polarized (TZVP) basis sets as developed by
Ahlrichs and co-workers.17 Other than the azide 5, all of the other
species were optimized at the B3LYP/TZVP level. Vertical
excitations were obtained at these geometries using time-dependent
density functional theory (TD-DFT).18 The open-shell and closed-
shell nitrenes were optimized at the CASSCF(4,4)/6-31G(d) level
using the Gaussian 0319 program. However, further CASSCF
optimizations and CASPT2 single-point energies of open-shell and
closed-shell nitrenes using larger active space and more active
electrons, such as CASSCF(10,10), were performed using MOL-
CAS 6.2.20 These CASPT2//CASSCF computations were ac-
complished using the pVDZ basis set of Pierloot et al.21
Results and Discussion
The UV-vis absorption spectrum of azide 5 in i-PROH
consists of two broad structureless bands, a weaker one located
at 450 nm and stronger one at about 280 nm (Figure 1A). The
absorption spectra in polar protic and aprotic solvent are similar
with ε (445 nm) ) 1390 M-1 cm-1 in CH3CN. In nonpolar
solvents, such as cyclohexane, a blue shift (1000-2000 cm-1
)
of the spectrum is observed. Calculations (TD-B3LYP) suggest
the lowest energy transition, S0 f S1, is centered at λmax ) 477
nm (f ) 0.0042). The S0 f S2 transition is centered at λmax
)
353 nm, but it carries no oscillator strength (f ) 0.0000). At
the same time, the RI-CC2 calculations locate the 352 nm
transition (f ) 0.0062) but do not show the 477 nm band.
Finally, it should be noted that azide 5 did not exhibit any
noticeable fluorescence in polar or nonpolar solvents (excitation
280-360 nm).
The temporal evolution observed was globally fitted12 to a sum
of exponential functions with the time constants τi: ∆A(λ,t) )
∑iεiexp(-t/τi), where λ is the probe wavelength, τi are the resulting
time constants, and εi are the decay-associated spectra reconstructed
from the resulting τi values based on the assumption of a
consecutive reaction mechanism. A decay-associated spectrum
defines the absorption, which contributes to the recorded ∆A spectra
and which is characteristic of a specific decay component obtained
by a global fit. A global fit assumes that the absorption of product
species changes only in their strength, not band shape, which may
affect the resulting time constants (τi) up to several picoseconds.
For each excitation wavelength used, a global fit was performed
on 512 kinetic traces within the 274 nm bandwidth of the white-
light continuum probe. The region from -125 to 125 fs was not
used in the global fit because of the solvent contribution to the
measured ∆A spectra.
Product Studies. Azide 5 was prepared as indicated in Scheme
26 and, upon irradiation in i-PrOH, found to undergo photo-
chemical reduction to amine 6 and ring substitution to form 7
and 8 (Scheme 3). Surprisingly, the regiochemistry of this
substitution reaction favors the formation of the more hindered
isomer 8 rather than 7, which can be isolated in only trace
amounts. The regiochemistry of this addition has been confirmed
by an X-ray crystal structure determination of the acetate 9
(Figure 2). Initial studies with a variety of nucleophilic solvents
under both high and low intensity irradiation conditions gave
the reduction/substitution ratios shown in Table 1.
Ultrafast Transient Absorption Spectra. Figure 1B-D shows
the typical ∆A absorption spectra of azide 5 measured in i-PrOH
upon 350 nm excitation at time delays starting from 100 fs. The
measurements of the ∆A spectra for neat i-PrOH using the identical
excitation conditions indicate that significant solvent signals occur
at short times of -50 and 50 fs. At 100 fs, following irradiation of
5 in i-PrOH at 350 nm, transient absorption (positive ∆A signal)
is extensive and consists of a broad UV absorption (350-400 nm)
and a bell-like visible absorption band centered at 580 nm (Figure
Computational Details. All of the calculations are performed
using Turbomole 5.9113 at the Ohio Supercomputer Center, with
the exception of the transition state calculations for formation of
adducts 13 and 14, which were carried out using Spartan.14 The
azide 5 was optimized using Becke’s three-parameter hybrid
exchange functional with Lee-Yang-Parr correlation functional
(7) El-Khoury, P. Z.; Tarnovsky, A. N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 453, 160–
166.
(8) See Supporting Information for further details.
(9) Kovalenko, S. A.; Dobryakov, A. L.; Ruthmann, J.; Ernsting, N. P.
Phys. ReV. A 1999, 59, 2369–2382. Rasmusson, M.; Tarnovsky, A. N.;
Åkesson, E.; Sundstro¨m, V. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 335, 201–208.
(10) For an example of the i-PrOH solvent response following 305 nm
excitation, see Figure SM1 in the Supporting Information.
(11) Kovalenko, S. A.; Ernsting, N. P.; Ruthmann, J. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1996, 258, 445–454.
(15) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. (b) Lee, C.;
Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785–789.
(16) (a) Ha¨ttig, C.; Weigend, F. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 5154–5161.
(b) Ha¨ttig, C.; Ko¨hn, A.; Hald, K. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 5401–
5410. (c) Ha¨ttig, C. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 7751–7761.
(17) Weigend, F.; Ha¨ser, F.; Patzelt, H.; Ahlrichs, R. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1998, 294, 143–152.
(18) Olivucci, M. Computational Photochemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
2005; pp 92-128.
(12) van Stokkum, I. H.; Larsen, D. S.; van Grondelle, R. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 2004, 1657, 82–104.
(19) Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.:
Wallingford, CT, 2004.
(13) (a) Ahlrichs, R.; Ba¨r, M.; Ha¨ser, M.; Horn, H.; Ko¨lmel, C. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1989, 162, 165. (b) For the current version of TURBO-
J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 346.
(14) Spartan ′06, Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA, Shao, Y.; et al. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3172.
(20) Karlstrom, G.; Lindh, R.; Malmqvist, P.-A.; Roos, B. O.; Ryde, U.;
Veryazov, V.; Widmark, P.-O.; Cossi, M.; Schimmelpfennig, B.;
Neogrady, P.; Seijo, L. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2003, 28, 222.
(21) Pierloot, K.; Dumez, B.; Widmark, P. O.; Ross, B. O. Theor. Chim.
Acta 1995, 90, 87–114.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 32, 2009 11537