J. Quintin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 3502–3506
3505
OMe
NH2
OMe
NO2
OMe
OMe
MeO
MeO
O
MeO
O
MeO
X
OMe O
OMe O
12 X = Cl
15 X = Br
b or c
11
a
3'-nitrotangeretin 8
d
d
OMe
NO2
OMe
NO2
OMe
O
OMe
OH
MeO
MeO
MeO
MeO
O
X
OH
O
O
13 X = Cl
16 X = Br
18
e
a
OMe
NH2
OMe
NH2
OMe
OH
OMe
MeO
MeO
O
MeO
MeO
O
X
O
OH
O
14 X = Cl
17 X = Br
19
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) H2, Pd–C 10%, DMF, rt, 3 h, 93%, (11), 95% (19) ; (b) NCS, CH2Cl2–pyridine 4:1, rt, 48 h, 95% ; (c) NBS, CH2Cl2–MeOH 2:1, rt, 5 h;
extraction then THF–NaOH N 1:1, rt, 0.25 h, 95%; (d) AlBr3, acetonitrile, 0 °C, then HCl 1 N, 50 °C, 0.33 h, 60% (13), 64% (16), 69% (18); (e) SnCl2, 2H2O, MeOH, 60 °C, 14 h, 53%
(14), 41% (17).
previously reported importance of the 5-hydroxyl group.1,27 Contri-
References and notes
bution of the 30-amino substituent to the activity is obvious from ob-
served results with 19 in regard to 23 and 18, the 30-unsubstituted or
1. Beutler, J. A.; Hamel, E.; Vlietinck, A. J.; Haemers, A.; Rajan, P.; Roitman, J. N.;
Cardellina, J. H., II; Boyd, M. R. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2333.
2. Lichius, J. J.; Thoison, O.; Montagnac, A.; Pa, M.; Guéritte-Voegelein, F.; Sévenet,
T. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 1012.
3. Shi, Q.; Li, L.; Chang, J.-J.; Autry, C.; Kozuka, M.; Konoshima, T.; Estes, J. R.; Lin,
nitro analogs, respectively. As we could not prepare the 30-amino
analog of 1, the compared effect of C-30 substituent (amino vs hydro-
xyl) was carried out with analogs 19 and 25: Antiproliferative activ-
ity and most ITA are better for 25, while activation of apoptosis
C. M.; Hamel, E.; McPhail, A. T.; McPhail, D. R.; Lee, K.-H. J. Nat. Prod. 1995, 58,
475.
pathway is more effective with 19. Lastly, the superior antiprolifer-
ative, proapoptotic and ITA activities of the reference flavone 1 con-
firms the crucial role of the C-3 methoxyl group.
4. Tuchinda, P.; Pompimon, W.; Reutrakul, V.; Pohmakotr, M.; Yoosook, C.;
Kongyai, N.; Sophasan, S.; Sujarit, K.; Upathum, S. E.; Santisuk, T. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 8073.
5. Tron, G. C.; Pirali, T.; Sorba, G.; Pagliai, F.; Busacca, S.; Genazzani, A. A. J. Med.
Chem. 2006, 49, 3033.
6. Chaliha, B. P.; Sastry, G. P.; Rao, P. R. Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 1441.
7. Cirillo, P. F.; Hammach, A.; Kamhi, V.; Moss, N.; Riska, P. S.; Pargellis, C. PCT Int.
Appl. 2002, WO 2004 014870..
8. Kruse, L. I.; Ladd, D. L.; Harrsch, P. B.; Mc Cabe, F. L.; Mong, S. M.; Faucette, L.;
Johnson, R. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32, 409.
9. Pitchumani, K.; Baskar, P.; Venkatachalapathy, C. Catal. Lett. 1993, 21, 157.
10. Peterson, J. R.; Do, H. D.; Dunham, A. J. Can. J. Chem 1988, 66, 1670.
11. Samajdar, S.; Becker, F. F.; Banik, B. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8017.
12. Horie, T.; Ohtsuru, Y.; Ninamimoto, N.; Yamashita, K.; Kawamura, Y.;
Tsukayama, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull 1997, 45, 1573. and previous Letters in this
series.
13. Buisson, D.; Quintin, J.; Lewin, G. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1035.
14. Burnham, W. S.; Sidwell, R. W.; Tolman, R. L.; Stout, M. G. J. Med. Chem. 1972,
15, 1075.
Though failing in its initial goal of access to the amino analog of
the potent natural flavone 1, this study is noteworthy from a phar-
macomodulation point of view. Influence on the cytotoxicity of
substitution patterns at C-30 (nitro and amino vs hydroxyl), and
C-3 (bromo and chloro substituents) are previously unpublished
to our knowledge. Preparation of this lacking amino analog is in
progress by an alternative synthetic process and its biological eval-
uation will be described subsequently.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jean-Christophe Jullian for NMR measurements, Dr.
Françoise Gueritte for a sample of 1, and Kevin Spelman for English
corrections of the Letter.
15. Horie, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Kitout, T.; Yamashita, K.
Phytochemistry 1995, 39, 1201.
16. Chu, H.-W.; Wu, H.-T.; Lee, Y.-J. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 2647.