ORGANIC
LETTERS
2001
Vol. 3, No. 18
2827-2830
A Streamlined Synthesis for
2,3-Dihydroxyterephthalamides
Christine J. Gramer and Kenneth N. Raymond*
Chemical Sciences DiVision, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Department
of Chemistry, UniVersity of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Received June 8, 2001
ABSTRACT
2,3-Dihydroxyterephthalamides have been synthesized through a route that avoids the protection and deprotection of the phenol groups. The
procedure allows for symmetric and unsymmetric amide linkages. This synthetic sequence significantly decreases the time and cost of preparation
and increases the overall yield of this class of metal chelators.
Catecholate ligands incorporating a variety of electron-
withdrawing substituents have been extensively investigated
for their extraordinarily high affinity for high oxidation state
metals.1-5 Catecholamides (CAM) are commonly found in
nature in siderophores, a class of bacterially secreted ligands
that function to sequester and acquire Fe(III) from the
environment.6 The siderophore enterobactin has an Fe(III)
stability constant of 1049, the highest known for any aqueous
ferric complex, due to the three catecholamides suspended
from its trilactone backbone.7
the 2,3-dihydroxyterephthalamides (TAM), display higher
Fe(III) affinity, are harder to oxidize, and are more acidic
than the CAM.8,9 The increased acidity of CAMC and TAM
relative to other catecholates broadens their utility because
they can fully complex Fe(III) in lower pH solutions. These
properties prompted successful investigations of catechol-
amide ligands as in vivo decorporation agents for Pu(IV)
and the in vitro stability of complexes with Ce(IV), a Pu(IV)
analogue.10-12 In addition, the two amide-linked substituents
can be modified to tailor the solubility of the ligand and allow
several ligands to be linked together to maximize the chelate
effect. Herein we report a shorter synthetic route to the TAMs
that decreases the time, cost, and hazards associated with
the synthesis.
While the catecholate anion itself is highly sensitive to
oxidation, amide substitution reduces this sensitivity. Cat-
echol derivatives containing two carbonyl substituents, e.g.,
the carboxamido-2,3-dihydroxyterephthalates (CAMC) and
The typical TAM synthesis8,9,13 involves six steps (Scheme
1) in an overall 30% yield: carboxylation of catechol to form
2, conversion of the carboxylic acids to methyl esters 3,
(1) Pierpont, C. G.; Lange, C. W. The Chemistry of Transition Metal
Complexes Containing Catechol and Semiquinone Ligands. In Progress in
Inorganic Chemistry; Karlin, K. D., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York,
1994; pp 331-442.
(2) Raymond, K. N.; Mu¨ller, G.; Matzanke, B. F. Complexation of Iron
by Siderophores. A Review of Their Solution and Structural Chemistry and
Biological Function. In Topics in Current Chemistry; Boschke, F. L., Ed.;
Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1984; pp 50-102.
(8) Weitl, F. L.; Raymond, K. N.; Durbin, P. W. J. Med. Chem. 1981,
24, 203-206.
(9) Garrett, T. M.; Miller, P. W.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 1989,
28, 128-133.
(3) Raymond, K. N. Specific Sequestering Agents for Iron and Actinides.
In U.S.-Italy International Workshop on EnVironmnetal Inorganic Chem-
istry; San Miniato, Italy; VCH Publishers: Deerfield Beach, Florida, 1985.
(4) Raymond, K. N. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1990, 105, 136-153.
(5) Telford, J. R.; Raymond, K. N.; Siderophores. In ComprehensiVe
Supramolecular Chemistry; Atwood, J. L., Davies, J. E. D., MacNicol, D.
D., Vogtle, F., Eds.; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Oxford, 1996; pp 245-266.
(6) Drechsel, H.; Winkelmann, G. Iron Chelation and Siderophores. In
Transition Metals in Microbial Metabolism; Winkelmann, G., Carrano, C.
J., Eds.; Harwood Academic Publishers: Newark, NJ, 1997.
(10) Raymond, K. N.; Smith, W. L. Actinide-Specific Sequestering
Agents and Decontamination Applications. In Structure and Bonding;
Goodenough, J. B. et al., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981;
pp 159-186.
(11) Lloyd, R. D.; Bruenger, F. W.; Mays, C. W.; Atherton, D. R.; Jones,
C. W.; Taylor, G. N.; Stevens, W.; Durbin, P. W.; Jeung, N.; Jones, E. S.
et al. Rad. Chem. 1984, 99, 106-128.
(12) Kappel, M. J.; Nitsche, H.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 1985,
24, 605-611.
(13) Rodgers, S. J.; Ng, C. Y.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985,
107, 4094-4095.
(7) Loomis, L. D.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 906-911.
10.1021/ol016253u CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/10/2001