photoreaction of 1-alkenoylindoles.6b Therefore, the presence
of a chlorine atom on the R-position of the indole ring is
important for both driving the photoreaction of 1a and
presenting new cyclization products which are different from
that obtained in the intermolecular photoreaction of 1-ben-
zoylindole-3-carbaldehyde with vinyl acetate.6a
secondary radical and chlorine atom. In comparison, the
reaction was more efficient in acetone than in other solvents
as shown in Table 1. Therefore, acetone was selected as the
solvent in all other photoreactions of 1-(ω-alkenyl)-2-
haloindoles 1a-o (Table 2). All products were fully identi-
1
fied by H, 13C NMR and MS, and the structures of 2b, 3b
Several methods have been reported for the synthesis of
1,2-fused indoles. For example, SmI2-promoted reductive
cyclization of indole dialdehydes,7a Fenton agent-mediated
oxidative cyclization of 1-(ω-iodoalkyl)indole,7b R2BH-
mediated reductive cyclization of 1-(ω-alkenyl)indoles,7c
sodium benzenesulfinate-copper acetate catalyzed radical
cyclization of 1-(ω-allylsulfonylalkyl)indole,7d and Bu3SnH-
AIBN-mediated radical cyclization of 1-(ω-iodoalkyl)-
indoles.7e However, these reactions required the use of
metallic catalysts, especially the tributyltin hydride, and the
yields were not satisfactory and always accompanied by
noncyclization reactions. Therefore, a more effective and
metal-free process is desirable.
We first investigated the effect of solvent on the photo-
reaction of 1-(but-3-enyl)-2-chloroindole-3-carbaldehyde (1a)
(Table 1). It was found that 1a could be reacted in all selected
solvents to afford two cyclization products. The conversions
of 1a and the yields and ratio of the products depended on
solvents. In methylene dichloride and acetone, two chlorine-
retained products 2a and 3a were obtained in excellent
overall yields; in acetonitrile or ethyl acetate, an unsaturated
compound 4a was formed in addition to 2a; in methanol, a
new product 5a was produced, which was obviously derived
from the coupling of carbocation with methanol, and only
minor chlorine-retained product 2a was separated. The results
indicated that secondary carbocation was formed in more
polar solvents probably from electron transfer between the
were further confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1).
Compound 2b (CCDC 695497) forms a monoclinic unit cell
that belongs to the P2(1)/c space group with the unit cell
parameters a ) 9.601(4) Å, b ) 10.575(5) Å, c ) 12.022(5)
Å, ꢀ ) 92.744(7)°, V ) 1219.3(10) Å3. Compound 3b
(CCDC 695496) forms a monoclinic unit cell that belongs
to the P2(1)/c space group with the unit cell parameters a )
9.2370(7) Å, b ) 15.9270(12) Å, c ) 7.9660(6) Å, ꢀ )
93.3640(10)°, V ) 1169.92(15) Å3.
It is noticeable from Table 2 that the photoreactions of
1-(ω-alkenyl)-2-halo-3-acylindoles (1a,b,d-l) exclusively
led to the cyclization products when these substrates were
irradiated in the deaerated acetone solution at ambient
temperature except 1c. Two halogen-retained products were
generally produced in each photoreaction, which was much
like the result of an atom-transfer cyclization reaction.8 The
advantages of this reaction over Bu3SnH-mediated cyclization
of 1-(ω-alkenyl)-2-haloindoles7e are not only the high yields
but also the halogen-atom retention in the products which
allows for further functionalization. However, it was found
that 1-(but-3-enyl)-2-chloro-3-methylindole (1n) and ethyl
1-(but-3-enyl)-2-chloroindole-3-carboxylate (1o), both of
which had no acyl groups on indoles, could not afford the
cyclization products under similar conditions. It could be
deduced that the formyl and acetyl groups were necessary
for the photocyclization reaction of 1-(ω-alkenyl)-2-haloin-
doles. Since both a halogen is needed on the R-position and
an acyl group on the ꢀ-position of the indole ring, it could
be proposed that the reaction mechanism of 3-acyl-2-
haloindoles with alkenes was much like that of the [2 + 2]
photoreaction of R,ꢀ-unsaturated enones with alkenes.2c,4b
The Michael-like coupling of the ꢀ-carbon of the diradical
in excited 3-acylindoles with double bonds of alkenes gave
new diradicals (Scheme 2). Subsequently, the halogen atom
transfer occurred from the diradical before the coupling of
diradical to form cyclobutane. Comparatively, it is difficult
for 3-methylindole and ethyl indole-3-carboxylate to become
Table 1. Photoreaction of 1a in Different Solventsa
(4) (a) Winkler, J. D.; Bowen, C. M.; Liotta, F. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95,
2003. (b) Winkler, J. D.; Ragains, J. R. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4031. (c) Ragains,
J. R.; Winkler, J. D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4437.
yieldc (%)
(5) (a) Wang, C.-L.; Zhang, W.; Lu, S.-C.; Wu, J.-F.; Shi, Z.-J. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 5176. (b) Lu, S.-C.; Zhang, W.; Pan, J.-H.; Zhang, J.
Synthesis 2008, 10, 1517.
entry solvent time (h) convnb (%) 5-exo 6-endo 6-endo
(6) (a) Ikeda, M.; Ohno, K.; Mohri, S.; Takahashi, M.; Tamura, Y.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 405. (b) Oldroyd, D. L.; Weedon,
A. C. Chem. Commun. 1992, 1491.
1
2
3
4
5
CH2Cl2
Me2CO
AcOEt
MeCN
MeOH
4
4
8
8
8
81
99
78
76
81
2a 48 3a 39
2a 53 3a 43
2a 72
4a 14
4a 48
5a 88
(7) (a) Lin, S.-C.; Yang, F.-D.; Shiue, J. S.; Yang, S.-M.; Fang, J.-M.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2909. (b) Artis, D. R.; Cho, I. S.; Figueroa, S. J.;
Muchowski, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2456. (c) Ishikura, M.; Idaa,
W.; Yanada, K. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 1015. (d) Wang, S.-F.; Chuang,
C.-P.; Lee, W.-H. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6109. (e) Dobbs, A. P.; Jones,
K.; Veal, K. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4857.
2a 38
2a
6
a 0.3 mmol of 1a was dissolved in different solvents (20 mL). The
solution was irradiated at λ g 300 nm with a high-pressure mercury lamp
(500 W) under argon atmosphere at ambient temperature. b Conversion was
calculated on the basis of 1a. c Yield of isolated product based on consumed
1a.
(8) (a) Lin, H.-H.; Chang, W.-S.; Luo, S.-Y.; Sha, C.-K. Org. Lett. 2004,
19, 3289. (b) Rey, V.; Pierini, A. B.; Penenory, A. B. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 1223. (c) Sanz, M.; Douhal, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 435. (d) Cheung,
E.; Netherton, M. R.; Scheffer, J. R.; Trotter, J. Org. Lett. 2000, 1, 77.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 17, 2009
3903