41-95%; however, the reaction is largely limited to electron-
poor ketones. In general, enolizable protons were replaced
with fluorine while ortho-substituted aryl and aryl-methyl
ketones typically failed to give the desired product. Tuning
of the reaction conditions and/or addition of a cocatalyst
(Cu(OTf)2 or thiourea) was required for certain substrate
combinations.
Our laboratory has developed the use of acyl silanes as
acyl anion equivalents in the racemic11 and enantioselective4
cross silyl benzoin reaction. Additionally, we have found
La(CN)3 to be a particularly reactive catalyst for promoting
the cross silyl benzoin between acyl silanes and aldehydes,
with reaction times under 5 min.12 We postulated that under
La(CN)3 catalysis we might be able to engage ketone
electrophiles with acyl silanes. We were hopeful that these
conditions might lead to a more general reaction for
intermolecular ketone acylation. Pitfalls to be navigated in
this variant include undesired dimerization of the acyl silane,
nonproductive proton transfer between the (silyloxy)nitrile
anion intermediate and the ketone electrophile, and potential
retro-benzoin reaction13 of the R-siloxy ketone product
(Figure 2).
THF to deliver the desired R-hydroxyketone product in
approximately 40% yield within 20 min. Competing with
desired product formation was the deprotonation of ac-
etophenone, leading to the quenched silyl cyanohydrin (3).
In contrast to the aldehyde silyl benzoin reaction,11 the ketone
benzoin addition is apparently reversible: subjection of the
product 2a to the reaction conditions led to the formation of
3a and acetophenone. For the reaction of 1a with acetophe-
none, the retro-benzoin occurs at a much slower rate than
the forward reaction and was minimized by shorter reaction
times. Employing 2 equiv of ketone proved to be optimal,
as a slight decrease in yield was observed when 3 equiv was
used. We screened a number of metal cyanide catalysts and
found that numerous M(CN)n species effectively promoted
the reaction and gave complete conversion (Table 1);
Table 1. Catalyst Screen and Optimizationa
entry catalystb x mol % convn (%)c
2a:3d
yield (%)e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ce(CN)3
Y(CN)3
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
5
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
62
3.2:1
4.5:1
6.5:1
6.8:1
8.0:1
8.6:1
10.5:1
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
95
94
nd
nd
Yb(CN)3
Sc(CN)3
Er(CN)3
Hf(CN)4
La(CN)3
La(CN)3
La(CN)3
La(CN)3
La(CN)3
9
10
11
nd
nd
nd
2
1
7
a Conditions: 1.0 equiv of 1a, 2.0 equiv of ketone, THF, [1a]0 ) 0.04
M, rt, 20 min. b Catalyst prepared in situ as described in the Supporting
Information c Conversion determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. d Ratio of
2a:3 determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. e Yields of analytically pure
material after SiO2 column chromatography.
Figure 2. Proposed acyl silane-ketone benzoin reaction.
Gratifyingly, acyl silane 1a reacted with 1 equiv of
acetophenone in the presence of 20 mol % of La(CN)3 in
however, La(CN)3 provided the highest ratio of desired
product to the quenched cyanohydrin.14 Optimization of the
catalyst loading showed that the benzoin product could be
obtained in up to 95% yield with 10 mol % catalyst loading.
Lowering the catalyst loading to 5 mol % provided the
product with no change to the conversion or yield. Upon
further reduction of the catalyst loading to 2 mol % and 1
mol %, the reaction stalled with incomplete conversion after
24 h.
With optimized conditions in hand, we wished to examine
the scope of the reaction. Using acyl silane 1a, we varied
the ketone employed (Table 2). The reactions proceeded with
complete consumption of acyl silane, with isolated yields
ranging from 40 to 95%. It should be noted that all examples
(6) (a) Hachisu, Y.; Bode, J. W.; Suzuki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 8432–8433. (b) Takikawa, H.; Hachisu, Y.; Bode, J. W.; Suzuki, K.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3492–3494. (c) Takikawa, H.; Suzuki,
K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2713–2716.
(7) (a) Enders, D.; Niemeier, O.; Balensiefer, T. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 1463–1467. (b) Enders, D.; Niemeier, O.; Raabe, G. Synlett
2006, 2431–2434.
(8) Li, Y.; Feng, Z.; You, S.-L. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2263–2265.
(9) Demir, A. S.; Esiringu, I.; Gollu, M.; Reis, O. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 2197–2199.
(10) (a) Bausch, C. C.; Johnson, J. S. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347,
1207–1211. (b) Demir, A. S.; Reis, B.; Reis, O.; Eymu¨r, S.; Go¨llu¨, M.;
Tural, S.; Saglam, G. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 72, 7439–7442.
(11) (a) Linghu, X.; Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
2534–2536. (b) Linghu, X.; Bausch, C. C.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 1833–1840.
(12) Bausch, C. C.; Johnson, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4283–4285.
(13) Chiang, P.-C.; Kaeobamrung, J.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 3520–3521.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 17, 2009
3871