under the same conditions)3 and (2) the high diastereoselec-
tivities in the oxidative homocoupling reactions are induced via
three different pathways controlled by the substituents on the
2,3-positions of the naphthalene rings (i.e., epimerization of the
axis along with diastereoselective crystallization, thermody-
namic, and kinetic control pathways).2c,d Our current challenge
is to determine how many naphthalene units can be elaborately
constructed by repeated homocoupling reactions via the above
three pathways. In the case of the naphthalene unit with a
methoxy group where diastereoselectivity is caused by epimer-
ization of the newly formed axis along with diastereoselective
crystallization, the synthesis of chiral 16mers are the upper limit
because of their low solubilities.2c Furthermore, for a naphtha-
lene unit with a diethylaminocarbonylmethoxy group in which
a rapid coupling reaction with a high homochiral diastereose-
lectivity and slow epimerization of the newly formed axis leads
to a kinetically controlled product, the construction of 24mers
is the upper limit because of their low stabilities and the
difficulty of isolations.2g Herein, we report our last endeavor in
the synthesis of oligonaphthalenes with n-butoxy side chains
where axial chirality is induced under thermodynamic control,
and the high solubilities and stabilities are attributed to the side
chains.
Synthesis of Chiral Dotriacontanaphthalenes:
How Many Naphthalene Units Are We Able To
Elaborately Connect?
Daisuke Sue,† Kazuto Takaishi,†,‡ Takunori Harada,§
Reiko Kuroda,§,| Takeo Kawabata,† and Kazunori Tsubaki*,
Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto UniVersity, JST
ERATO-SORST Kuroda Chiromorphology Team, Graduate
School of Arts and Sciences, The UniVersity of Tokyo, and
Graduate School of Life and EnVironmental Science,
Kyoto Prefectural UniVersity
ReceiVed March 2, 2009
Scheme 1 outlines the synthesis for chiral oligonaphthalenes
with a butoxy substituent on naphthalene. Starting (S)-2 (total
ca. 170 g) was treated with CuCl2 in the presence of isopro-
pylamine to afford quaternaphthalene 4A as a diastereomeric
mixture with respect to the newly formed central axis. The
mixture was separated by column chromatography on SiO2 to
give all-(S)-4A (57% yield) as the major product and hetero-
(S,R,S)-4A (11% yield) as the minor fraction in total of 68%
yield and 68% diastereo excess (de). To determine the absolute
configuration,2e,g,4 each diastereomeric 4A was condensed with
tetraphenylporphyrin carboxylic acid (TPPCO2H) under WSC/
DMAP conditions to afford all-(S)-4B and hetero-4B in 79%
and 62% yields, respectively. Methylation of the central hydroxy
groups of all-(S)-4A (96% yield), followed by mono deprotec-
tion of the bottom benzyl group by Pd/C and H2 provided all-
(S)-4D (46% yield). Repeating the process sequence, octina-
(S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S,S)-
dotriacontanaphthalenes 32A-E alternately possessing bu-
toxy and methoxy side chains were precisely constructed
through a bottom-up synthesis, and their absolute configura-
tions and fluorescence quantum yields were determined.
There are two major synthetic routes for constructing over-
nanosized molecules promising new functional materials. One
is the polymer synthesis method, and the other is a bottom-up
synthesis procedure beginning with small building blocks.
Although these two approaches have both merits and demerits,
the notable merit of the bottom-up synthesis is that complicated
molecules can be precisely constructed without a molecular-
weight distribution.1
We have focused on optically active (especially helical) rod-
shaped oligo(2,3-dioxyfunctionalized)naphthalenes, which are
connected at their 1,4-positions in CuCl2/amine-promoted oxida-
tive coupling reactions.2,3 Through our previous investigations,
we have revealed that (1) the newly formed axis bond between
naphthalene rings is easily epimerized under the coupling
conditions employed (the other axis bonds are not epimerized
(2) (a) Tsubaki, K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2179–2188. (b) Takaishi,
K.; Tsubaki, K.; Tanaka, H.; Miura, M.; Kawabata, T. Yakugaku Zasshi 2006,
126, 779–787. (c) Tsubaki, K.; Miura, M.; Morikawa, H.; Tanaka, H.; Kawabata,
T.; Furuta, T.; Tanaka, K.; Fuji, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16200–16201.
(d) Tsubaki, K.; Tanaka, H.; Takaishi, K.; Miura, M.; Morikawa, H.; Furuta, T.;
Tanaka, K.; Fuji, K.; Sasamori, T.; Tokitoh, N.; Kawabata, T. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 6579–6587. (e) Tsubaki, K.; Takaishi, K.; Tanaka, H.; Miura, M.;
Kawabata, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2587–2590. (f) Tsubaki, K.; Miura, M.;
Nakamura, A.; Kawabata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 1241–1244. (g) Tsubaki,
K.; Takaishi, K.; Sue, D.; Kawabata, T. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4238–4241.
(h) Tsubaki, K.; Takaishi, K.; Sue, D.; Matsuda, K.; Kanemitsu, Y.; Kawabata,
T. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4279–4282.
(3) (a) Brussee, J.; Jansen, A. C. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 3261–3262.
(b) Brussee, J.; Groenendijk, J. L. G.; te Koppele, J. M.; Jansen, A. C. A.
Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3313–3319. (c) Smrcˇina, M.; Lorenc, M.; Hanusˇ, V.;
Sedmera, P.; Kocˇovsky´, P. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1917–1920. (d) Smrcˇina,
M.; Pola´kova´, J.; Vyskocˇil, S.; Kocˇovsky´, P. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4534–
4538. (e) Habaue, S.; Seko, T.; Okamoto, Y. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 2604–
2608.
(4) (a) Harada, N.; Nakanishi, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 257–263. (b)
Matile, S.; Berova, N.; Nakanishi, K.; Novkova, S.; Philipova, I.; Blagoev, B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7021–7022.
† Kyoto University.
‡ Present address: Supramolecular Science Laboratory, RIKEN (The Institute
of Physical and Chemical Research).
§ JST ERATO-SORST Kuroda Chiromorphology Team.
| The University of Tokyo.
Kyoto Prefectural University.
(1) For bottom-up construction of giant molecules: (a) Aratani, N.; Osuka,
A.; Kim, Y. H.; Jeong, D. H.; Kim, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1458–
1462. (b) Izumi, T.; Kobashi, S.; Takimiya, K.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 5286–5287. (c) Aratani, N.; Takagi, A.; Yanagawa, Y.;
Matsumoto, T.; Kawai, T.; Yoon, Z. S.; Kim, D.; Osuka, A. Chem.sEur. J.
2005, 11, 3389–3404.
(5) We tried several times to measure HRMS and/or elemental analysis of
32Es; however, because of their huge molecular weights and chemical instabili-
ties, the attempts were not fruitful.
3940 J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3940–3943
10.1021/jo900463t CCC: $40.75 2009 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/16/2009