clopentene derived from allenynes.5 For the reactions via
type II of ruthenacyclopentene, only intramolecular [2 + 2]
cycloaddition4a and intermolecular coupling using cyclonona-
1,2-diene have been reported so far.4b During the course of
further studies on the cyclodimerization via type I ruthena-
cyclopentene, we encountered an unexpected cyclization via
type II ruthenacyclopentene. That is, when an allenyne 1a
was reacted with Cp*RuCl(cod) in toluene under the previous
optimal conditions, the desired cyclodimerization product 2a
was obtained in only 28% yield, and an unidentified
compound 3a was produced in 63% yield (Scheme 2, eq 1).
ture of 3a, which has a bicyclo[4.2.0]octa-1(8),5-diene
skeleton. It was speculated that the product 3a is formed by
[2 + 2] cycloaddition via formation of type II ruthenacycle
followed by reductive elimination6-8 and that the existence
of the hydroxy group(s) in 1a affects the reaction pathway.
To examine the influence of hydroxy functional groups on
this reaction, the reaction of 1a with Cp*RuCl(cod) catalyst
was carried out in methanol instead of toluene (Scheme 2,
eq 2). We were surprised to find that the reaction was
completed within 2 h, and only the [2 + 2] cycloaddition
product 3a was exclusively produced in quantitative yield.
Furthermore, the reaction of 1b with Cp*RuCl(cod)
catalyst in methanol again produced only [2 + 2] cycload-
dition product 3b in quantitative yield, while the use of
toluene as a solvent in the same reaction exclusively
produced cyclodimerization product 2b in an excellent yield,
as was previously reported (Scheme 3).5 These results
Scheme 2
Scheme 3
Detailed analyses of various spectral data, including 2D-
NMR (COSY, NOESY, HMBC, HSQC, and INAD-
EQUATE, see Supporting Information), revealed the struc-
(4) For reaction of allenynes via ruthenacyclopentene, see: (a) Oh, C. H.;
Gupta, A. K.; Park, D. I.; Kim, N. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5670. (b) Bai,
T.; Xue, P.; Zhang, L.; Ma, S.; Jia, G. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2929. For
Ru-catalyzed reaction of allene and other multiple bonds, see: (c) Yamagu-
chi, M.; Kido, Y.; Omata, K.; Hirama, M. Synlett 1995, 1181. (d) Trost,
B. M.; Pinkerton, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4068. (e) Kang,
S.-K.; Kim, K.-J.; Hong, Y.-T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1584. (f)
Bustelo, E.; Gue´rot, C.; Hercouet, A.; Carboni, B.; Toupet, L.; Dixneuf,
P. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11582. (g) Ngai, M.-Y.; Skucas, E.;
Krische, M. J. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2705. (h) Vovard-Le Bray, C.; De´rien,
S.; Dixneuf, P. H.; Murakami, M. Synlett 2008, 193.
indicate that the reaction pathway of ruthenium-catalyzed
cyclization of allenynes was dramatically changed depending
on the type of solVent employed and that the formation of
two quite different types of products from the identical
allenyne could be controlled by only changing the solVent.9
Thus, the [2 + 2] cycloaddition of various allenynes in
methanol was investigated, and the results are summarized
in Table 1. The cyclization of 1c in methanol proceeded
smoothly to afford the bicyclic compound 3c in 94% yield
(run 1). The reactions of 1d-g having an aromatic group or
a siloxymethyl group on the alkyne afforded 3d-g in high
yields (runs 2-5). When the allenyne with a cyclic acetal
part 1h was used as a substrate, the spiro compound 3h was
produced in 98% yield (run 6). Furthermore, fused-nitrogen
heterocyclic compound 3i was also synthesized by [2 + 2]
cycloaddition of 1i (run 7). It is noteworthy that the reaction
of these substrates in toluene under the previously optimized
conditions had exclusively proceeded via type I ruthenacy-
clopentene, affording the corresponding cyclodimerization
products in high yields.
(5) Saito, N.; Tanaka, Y.; Sato, Y. Organometallics 2009, 28, 669.
(6) For transition-metal-catalyzed [2 + 2] cycloaddition of allenynes,
see: (a) Shen, Q.; Hammond, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6534. (b)
Oh, C. H.; Park, D. I.; Jung, S. H.; Reddy, V. R.; Gupta, A. K.; Kim, Y. M.
Synlett 2005, 2092. See also: ref 4a.
(7) For recent examples of thermal [2 + 2] cycloaddition of allenynes,
see: (a) Cao, H.; Van Ornum, S. G.; Deschamps, J.; Flippen-Anderson, J.;
Laib, F.; Cook, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 933. (b) Brummond,
K. M.; Chen, D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3473. (c) Mukai, C.; Hara, Y.; Miyashita,
Y.; Inagaki, F. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4454. (d) Jiang, X.; Ma, S.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7589. (e) Ohno, H.; Mizutani, T.; Kadoh, Y.; Aso,
A.; Miyamura, K.; Fujii, N.; Tanaka, T. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4378. (f)
Buisine, O.; Gandon, V.; Fensterbank, L.; Aubert, C.; Malacria, M. Synlett
2008, 751. See also: ref 4a.
(8) For examples of four-membered ring formation by ruthenium-
catalyzed [2 + 2] cycloaddition of multiple bonds, see: (a) Mitsudo, T.;
Kokuryo, K.; Takegami, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 722. (b)
Mitsudo, T.; Kokuryo, K.; Shinsugi, T.; Nakagawa, Y.; Watanabe, Y.;
Takegami, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 4492. (c) Mitsudo, T.; Naruse, H.;
Kondo, T.; Ozaki, Y.; Watanabe, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994,
33, 580. (d) Yi, C. S.; Lee, D. W.; Chen, Y. Organometallics 1999, 18,
2043. (e) Yamamoto, Y.; Kitahara, H.; Ogawa, R.; Kawaguchi, H.; Tatsumi,
K.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4310. (f) Jordan, R. W.; Tam,
W. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3031. (g) Le Paih, J.; De´rien, S.; Bruneau, C.;
Demerseman, B.; Toupet, L.; Dixneuf, P. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 2912. (h) Alvarez, P.; Gimeno, J.; Lastra, E.; Garc´ıa-Granda, S.; Van
der Maelen, J. F.; Bassetti, M. Organometallics 2001, 20, 3762. (i) Tenaglia,
A.; Giordano, L. Synlett 2003, 2333. (j) Le Paih, J.; De´rien, S.; Demerseman,
B.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H.; Toupet, L.; Dazinger, G.; Kirchner, K.
Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 1312. See also: ref 4f.
It is known that a chloro ligand on the Ru(II) complex
having a Cp ligand dissociates in alcoholic solvents, giving
a cationic ruthenium species.10 Therefore, the reaction of 1b
withthecationicrutheniumcomplexpreparedfromCp*RuCl(cod)
and AgOTf in situ in THF was examined, and it was found
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 18, 2009
4125