M. Kranz et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17 (2009) 5336–5341
5341
1.96–2.01 (m, 2H), d 2.35–2.39 (m, 1H), d 2.71–2.75 (m, 1H), d 2.81–
References and notes
2.88 (m, 2H), d 5.72 (br s, 2H), d 7.63–7.74 (m, 3H), d 8.06–8.08 (d,
J = 8 Hz, 1H) d 12.62 (s, 1H); MS (ESI) m/z 360.23 (M+H)+, 358.28
(MꢁH)+; LC (eluent: acetonitrile/water, 0–100% gradient over
5 min); t 3.31 min.
Compounds in Tables 1 and 2. From 11, the general procedure
described for the synthesis of 6 was followed.
1. Cheung, W. Y. Biochemistry 1967, 6, 1079.
2. Schwabe, U.; Miyake, M.; Ohga, Y.; Daly, J. Mol. Pharmacol. 1976, 12, 900.
3. Dastidar, S. G.; Rajagopal, D.; Ray, A. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2007, 85, 364.
4. Jin, S.-L. C.; Lan, L.; Zoudilova, M.; Conti, M. J. Immun. 2005, 175, 1523.
5. Robichaud, A.; Stamatiou, P. B.; Jin, S.-L. C.; Lachance, N.; MacDonald, D.;
Laliberte, F.; Liu, S.; Huang, Z.; Conti, M.; Chan, C.-C. J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 110, 1045.
6. Zhang, K. Y. J.; Card, G. L.; Suzuki, Y.; Artis, D. R.; Fong, D.; Gillette, S.; Hsieh, D.;
Neiman, J.; West, B. L.; Zhang, C.; Milburn, M. V.; Kim, S.-H.; Schlessinger, J.;
Bollag, G. Mol. Cell 2004, 15, 279.
7. Inhibition of PDE4B and PDE4D were measured using a luminescence-coupled
assay system developed by Cambrex. This assay system couples the formation
of AMP, derived from PDE4-catalyzyed hydrolysis of cAMP, to the formation of
ATP. The ATP is then used as a substrate for Luciferase and results in light as a
signal output. When PDE is inhibited or inactive, no AMP is produced, the
luciferase is inactive, and no light signal is produced. This assay is used in a
5. Crystallography
The PDE4B2B (residues 152–528, triple mutant [S482A, S487A,
S489A]) was expressed in Baculovirus infected Sf9 cells and purified
as described previously.19 To minimise C-terminal cleavage (to 503)
during cellbreakage andextraction, a proteaseinhibitorcocktailwas
included (Roche complete tablets). After clarification by centrifuga-
tion and filtration, PDE4B2 protein was purified on Q-Sepharose FF
and Cibacron Blue Sepharose FF. The eluate was applied to a 10 ml
Q-Sepharose HP column and eluted with a NaCL gradient to separate
out any cleaved protein. Intact protein was further purified by size
exclusion on a Superdex 200 column (26/60) and finally dialysed
into 10 mMHepes, pH7.0, 20 mM NaCL, 0.1 mM EDTAfor crystallog-
raphy. Purified protein was concentrated to 16–20 mg/ml in 10 mM
Hepes, pH 7.0, 20 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT.
X-ray quality co-crystallisation was set up as a hanging drop
experiment at 4 °C using 1 ll + 1 ll drops with protein (with sixfold
molar excess of inhibitor) and a well solution containing 18% PEG
4000, 18% glycerol, 0.08 M MES pH 6.8, 0.45 M NaCl, 0.15 M MgCl2,
0.05 M Na acetate, 0.05 M Mg acetate and 0.025 M ammonium sul-
fate. The crystals reached full size within four we0eks.
X-ray diffraction data were collected to 2.23 ÅA resolution at the
ESRF (station ID23.1) using a ADSC Q315 CCD detector and pro-
cessed as space group P41 with MOSFLM20 and SCALA within the
CCP4 programme suite.21 The structure was solved by Molecular
Replacement using PHASER22 and a search model derived from
1F0 J. Refinement was performed using REFMAC23 to a final R-fac-
tor = 17.9% (R-free = 22.9%). The coordinates consisted of two mol-
ecules in the asymmetric unit, each with a bound inhibitor. All
residues were built (in both molecules) except 486–494 and
512–528 that were too disordered. The coordinates have been
deposited in the PDB as deposition code 3HMV.
quenched assay format, where PDE4 enzyme (2.5
40 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CHAPS, 0.01% BSA, pH 7.5.) and cAMP
substrate (2.5 L; 2 M cAMP in 40 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CHAPS,
lL; ꢂ120 pM enzyme in
l
l
0.01% BSA, pH 7.5.) are added sequentially to a 384 well assay plate (Greiner
784075) pre-stamped with 12.5-50 nL compound at the desired concentration.
The reaction is incubated at room temperature for 1 h, then is quenched by the
addition of enzyme stop solution (1.5
catalog # LT27-253) and then the light signal is generated by the addition of
detection reagent (2.5 L, prepared as described by vendor, catalog# LT27-
lL; prepared as described by vendor;
l
250). The luminescence is then measured on a Viewlux imager (Perkin Elmer)
using emission filters of 613/55 nm or 618/40 nm and a 5 s. Compounds are
prepared in neat DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM. For inhibition curves,
compounds were diluted using a three fold serial dilution and tested at 11
concentrations (e.g., 50 lM-0.8 nM or 25 lM–0.42 nM or 2.5 lM–42 pM).
Curves were analysed as describe above using ActivityBase and XLfit , and
results were expressed as pIC50 values. Average standard deviations are for
PDE4B = 0.10 and PDE4D = 0.11.
8. Allen, F. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 2002, 58, 380.
9. Lee, M. E.; Markowitz, J.; Lee, J.-O.; Lee, H. FEBS Lett. 2002, 530, 53.
10. Allen, F. H.; Bird, C. M.; Rowland, R. S.; Raithby, P. R. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B
1997, 53, 696.
11. Mcmartin, C.; Bohacek, R. S. J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 333.
12. Card, G. L.; England, B. P.; Suzuki, Y.; Fong, D.; Powell, B.; Lee, B.; Luu, C.;
Tabrizizad, M.; Gillette, S.; Ibrahim, P. N.; Artis, D. R.; Bollag, G.; Milburn, M. V.;
Kim, S.-H.; Schlessinger, J.; Zhang, K. Y. J. Structure 2004, 12, 2233.
13. Gewald, K.; Schael, J. J. Prakt. Chem. 1973, 315, 39.
14. Houslay, M. D.; Adams, D. R. Biochem. J. 2003, 370, 1.
15. McLaughlin, M. M.; Cieslinski, L. B.; Burman, M.; Torphy, T. J.; Livi, G. P. J. Biol.
Chem. 1993, 268, 6470.
16. Xu, R. X.; Hassell, A. M.; Vanderwall, D.; Lambert, M. H.; Holmes, W. D.; Luther,
M. A.; Rocque, W. J.; Milburn, M. V.; Zhao, Y.; Ke, H.; Nolte, R. T. Science 2000,
288, 1822.
17. Manuscript in preparation.
18. Wang, H.; Peng, M.-S.; Chen, Y.; Robinson, H.; Houslay, M. D.; Cai, J.; Ke, H.
Biochem. J. 2007, 408, 193.
19. Rocque, W. J.; Holmes, W. D.; Patel, I. R.; Dougherty, R. W.; Ittoop, O.; Overton,
L.; Hoffman, C. R.; Wisely, G. B.; Willard, D. H.; Luther, M. A. Protein Exp. Purif.
1997, 9, 191.
20. Leslie, A. G. W., Joint CCP4 + ESF-EAMCB Newsletter on Protein
Crystallography, 1992, No. 26.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Surjit Bains, Girish Shah and Phil Hard-
wick for protein expression and Martin Fillmore for early chemis-
try development. GlaxoSmithKline funded this work.
21. Bailey, S. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 1994, 50, 760.
22. Storoni, L. C.; McCoy, A. J.; Read, R. J. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 2004, 60, 432.
23. Murshudov, G. N.; Vagin, A. A.; Dodson, E. J. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 1997, 53, 240.