direct arylation with aryl halide electrophiles,6 the use of
aliphatic electrophiles is rare. Very recently, Yu described
palladium(II)-catalyzed benzoic acid alkylation reactions,7
and Ackermann has reported a directed arene alkylation
employing a ruthenium catalyst where the catalytic cycle
likely involves arene metalation prior to interaction with the
alkyl halide.8 Palladium(0)-catalyzed arene alkylations em-
ploying norbornene have also been described by Catellani9
and Lautens,10 enabling the preparation of a wide range of
alkyl-substituted aromatic compounds.11
With a standard palladium(0) catalytic cycle employing
aliphatic halides, important first steps have been made
establishing intramolecular reactivity. For example, Buch-
wald and Henessy described the cyclization of R-chloroac-
etanilides in the formation of oxindoles,12 and Cheng reported
a cyclization of benzylic halides with a pendent pyrrole to
close a six-membered ring.13 An interesting tandem process
has also been described by Wong involving closure of a six-
membered ring between a benzyl bromide and a furan.14 On
the other hand, the reaction of oxazole with alkyl halides
reported by Hoarau constitutes the only example of inter-
molecular arene alkylation under this reaction paradigm.15
In this letter, we describe the establishment of broadly
applicable palladium-catalyzed heteroarene benzylation reac-
tions (Figure 1). A particular focus is accorded to the most
with palladium catalysis in reactions at unactivated C-H
bonds with sp2 carbon halides6 should also be accessible with
sp3 carbon electrophiles.
Given their challenging use under Friedel-Crafts reaction
conditions, sulfur-containing heterocycles2 were selected for
reaction development and optimization. From these studies,
we determined that treatment of the heterocycle with a benzyl
17
chloride (1.5 equiv) in the presence of Pd(OPiv)2 (2 mol
%), 2-Ph2P-2′-(Me2N)biphenyl18 (4 mol %), PivOH (20 mol
%), and Cs2CO3 (1.5 equiv) in toluene (0.5 M) at 110 °C
were optimal conditions. Choice of the appropriate electro-
phile is crucial (Table 1). While reactions with bromide,
Table 1. Effect of the Benzylic Leaving Group on Reactivity
entry
X
% GC yield
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Cl (2a)
OP(O)OEt2
Br
O2CCF3
OAc
81(78b)
51
6
11
0
0
OPiv
O2COMe
0
a Conditions: benzyl chloride (0.75 mmol), heteroarene (0.50 mmol),
Pd(OPiv)2 (0.01 mmol), 2-Ph2P-2′-(Me2N)biphenyl (0.02 mmol), PivOH
(0.10 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.75 mmol), toluene (1.0 mL), 110 °C, 16-20 h.
b Isolated yield.
Figure 1. Palladium-catalyzed heteroarene benzylation.
acetate, pivalate, trifluoroacetate, and carbonate electrophiles
provide little (less than 10%) or none of the desired cross-
coupling product, use of benzylic chloride or phosphonate
substrates generates 3 in 81% and 51% GC yields, respec-
tively (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). The importance of the
leaving group is interesting and merits further consideration.
From a convenience and cost effectiveness perspective, the
fact that the inexpensive, readily available benzyl chlorides
perform best is a desirable outcome. For this reason, we opted
to evaluate the scope with this class of electrophile. It is
important to note, however, that the use of the benzyl phos-
phonate electrophiles may have particular utility since they may
be easily prepared form the corresponding benzyl alcohol.
Illustrative examples with a range of sulfur-containing
heterocycles are included in Table 2. Thiazole substrates,
which are problematic under SEAr benzylation conditions
or necessitate deprotonation with strong bases followed by
electrophilic trapping,19 are ideal substrates for palladium-
challenging heterocycles of traditional benzylation tech-
niques, such as sulfur-containing heterocycles and those
bearing functional groups that would be incompatible with
Lewis acids and/or strong bases. The reactions are highly
regioselective and form industrially important diarylmethane
compounds.16 Furthermore, the establishment of generally
applicable Csp2-Csp3 direct benzylation reactions provides
compelling evidence that the wealth of reactivity uncovered
(7) Zhang, Y.-H.; Shi, B.-F.; Yu, J.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 6097.
(8) Ackermann, L.; Novak, P.; Vicente, R.; Hofmann, N. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6045.
(9) (a) Catellani, M.; Frignani, F.; Rangoni, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1997, 36, 119. (b) Catellani, M.; Cugini, F. Tetrahedron 1999, 55,
6595. (c) Catellani, M.; Motti, E.; Minari, M. Chem. Commun. 2000, 157.
(10) (a) Rudolph, A.; Rackelmann, N.; Turcotte-Savard, M.-O.; Lautens,
M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 289. (b) Martins, A.; Lautens, M. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 5095.
(11) For reviews, see: (a) Frisch, A. C.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 674. (b) Catellani, M.; Motti, E.; Della Ca′, N. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2008, 41, 1512.
(16) (a) Graffner-Nordberg, M.; Kolmodin, K.; Åqvist, J.; Queener, S. F.;
Hallberg, A. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2391. (b) Guile, S. D.; Bantick, J. R.;
Cooper, M. E.; Donald, D. K.; Eyssade, C.; Ingall, A. H.; Lewis, R. J.;
Martin, B. P.; Mohammed, R. T.; Potter, T. J.; Reynolds, R. H.; St-Gallay,
S. A.; Wright, A. D. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 254. (c) Izumi, K.; Kabaki,
M.; Uenaka, M.; Shimizu, S. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2007, 11, 1059.
(17) Bancroft, D. P.; Cotton, F. A.; Falvello, L. R.; Schwotzer, W.
Polyhedron 1988, 7, 615.
(12) Hennessy, E. J.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
12084.
(13) Hwang, S. J.; Cho, S. H.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
16158.
(14) Song, Z. Z.; Wong, H. N. C. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 33.
(15) Verrier, C.; Hoarau, C.; Marsais, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7,
647.
(18) Harris, M. C.; Geis, O.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
6019.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 18, 2009
4161