Grote and Sander
JOCArticle
TABLE 11. Spin Densities at the Nitrene and the Carbene Centers
of Q-5
spin densitya
Q5
at N
at C4
2,3,5,6- (f)
2,3,6- (e)
2,6- (d)
2,3,5- (g)
2,5- (h)
2,3- (i)
1.5771
1.5749
1.5739
1.5803
1.5709
1.5811
1.5742
1.2480
1.2420
1.2398
1.2565
1.2586
1.2452
1.2493
2- (k)
aUB3LYP/6-311G(d,p).
FIGURE 15. Geometries of the 4A2 state of Q-5d and the 2A2 state
of D-5d on the UB3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory. Both states
show C2v symmetry and the bond lengths and angles, as well as the
calculated IR spectra, are quite similar.
increase of the temperature results in an efficient recombina-
tion of the radical pair under formation of 1. The effect of
argon vs neon matrices is not understood, we can only
speculate that the different shape of matrix cages in these rare
gases influences the stability of the radical pairs.
using a N2(l)-cooled MCT detector in the range 400-4000 cm-1
.
X-band EPR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Elexsys E500
EPR spectrometer with an ER077R magnet (75 mm pole cap
distance), an ER047 XG-T microwave bridge, and an oxygen-free
high-conductivity copper rod (75 mm length, 3 mm diameter) cooled
by a closed-cycle cryostat.
Theoretical studies with 4-dehydrophenylnitrene have
4
shown that the ground state of 5a is the A2 state, only
2-5 kcal/mol lower in energy than the lowest lying doublet
state, which is a 2A2 state.17 Thus, the lowest-energy doublet
state of 5a has the same electronic configuration as the
quartet ground state. The geometries of both states are quite
similar and show only minor bond length alternation, mostly
Broadband irradiation was carried out with mercury high-
pressure arc lamps in housings equipped with quartz optics and
dichroic mirrors in combination with cutoff filters (50% trans-
mission at the wavelength specified). IR irradiation from the
lamps was absorbed by a 10 cm path of water. For 254 nm
irradiation a low pressure mercury arc lamp was used. A XeCl
excimer laser was used for 308 nm irradiation.
Computational Methods. Optimized geometries and vibra-
tional frequencies of all species were calculated with the Gauss-
ian 03 suite of programs.30 The computer simulation of the EPR
spectrum was performed by using the XSophe computer simula-
tion software suite (version 1.0.4),31 developed by the Centre for
Magnetic Resonance and Department of Mathematics, Uni-
versity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, and Bruker Analy-
tik GmbH, Rheinstetten. Germany.
˚
reflected in a 0.028 A longer C-N bond in the doublet
geometry. Similar results are found for the geometries and
infrared spectra of the nitreno radicals 5d-l. In Figure 15 the
geometries of the 4A2 state of Q-5d and the 2A2 state of D-5d
are shown as typical examples for nitreno radicals. Both C2v
symmetrical states show almost similar bond lengths and
bond angles. As a consequence, the calculated doublet and
quartet infrared spectra are very similar with only small
frequency shifts (Table 4). This makes it difficult to deter-
mine the spin state of these nitreno radicals by infrared
spectroscopy, in particular since only the strongest bands
are visible in the experiment. Hence, only EPR spectroscopy,
which is very sensitive to paramagnetic species, proves the
quartet state of the nitreno radicals. An interesting case is 5f,
where the doublet state has a nonplanar CS symmetrical
geometry, while Q-5f is planar with C2v symmetry. As a result,
the calculated IR spectra of the quartet and doublet states of 5f
are different enough and allowed a definitive assignment of the
electronic state of 5f based only on IR spectroscopy.19
Acknowledgment. This work was financially supported by
the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie.
Supporting Information Available: Additional figures and
tables; synthetic, spectroscopic, and analytical data. Geome-
tries, total energies, and IR spectroscopic data of the photo-
1
products. Relative energies of all rearrangement products; H
and 13C NMR spectra. This material is available free of charge
Experimental Section
(30) Frisch, M. J. T.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, Jr., J. A.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci,
B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada,
M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima,
T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian,
H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski,
J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg,
J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.;
Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman,
J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.;
Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin,
R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.;
Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.;
Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, Revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.:
Wallingford CT, 2004.
Synthesis. All phenyl azides were synthesized in analogy to
the synthesis of 2,3,4,5-tetrafluoroaniline and 2,3,4,5-tetrafluor-
ophenylazide described in the literature.19 The 2,6-difluoro-4-
iodoaniline was synthesized starting from 2,6-difluoroaniline
according to a procedure described by Kutepov et al.28 The
synthetic, spectroscopic, and analytical data are given in the
Supporting Information.
Matrix Isolation. Matrix isolation experiments were per-
formed by standard techniques29 with closed cycle helium
cryostats allowing cooling of a CsI spectroscopic window to 4 K.
FTIR spectra were recorded with a standard resolution of 0.5 cm-1
,
(28) Kutepov, D. F.; Khokhlov, D. N.; Tuzhilkina, V. L. Zh. Obsh. Khim.
1960, 30, 2484–9.
(31) Griffin, M.; Muys, A.; Noble, C.; Wang, D.; Eldershaw, C.; Gates,
K. E.; Burrage, K.; Hanson, G. R. Mol. Phys. Rep. 1999, 26, 60–84.
(29) Dunkin, I. R. Matrix Isolation Techniques: A Practical Approach;
Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998.
7382 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 19, 2009