D. R. Anderson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4882–4884
4883
HO
O
Cl
Cl
Cl
O
Cl
c
O
a,b
O
d
HO
O
O
O
S
O
S
O
S
O
S
4
O
5
6
7
Cl
HN
S
O
O
g
e
f
O
NH
O
HO
Cl
O
S
O
O
9
S
O
12
8
HN
Cl
g
O
O
O
NH
NHBoc
H2N
S
S
O
O
10
13
11
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) BBr3; (b) allyl bromide, K2CO3, DMF; (c) PhNEt2, 200 °C; (d) OsO4/NaIO4; (e) H3PO4, 120 °C; (f) (i) NaBH4; (ii) MsCl; (iii) NaHCO3; (g) (i)
(R)-propane-1,2-diamine, Pd2(dba)3 (5 mol %), ( )BINAP (10 mol %), Cs2CO3 (2 equiv) toluene, 110 °C, 24 h; (ii) TFA/CH2Cl2; (iii) NaOMe/MeOH.
The synthesis of an analog with a pyridine-containing binding
element is shown in Scheme 2. Nitroquinoline 14 was treated with
ethyl cyanoacetate and KOH in DMF to provide aminocyanoquino-
line 15.3 The amino group was converted to bromide via diazotiza-
tion to provide 16. Nucleophilic aromatic substitution on the
resulting bromide with methyl thioglycolate and subsequent thio-
phene formation produced 17. Conversion of the amino group in 17
to bromide 18 was accomplished by diazotization and substitution.
The resulting bromide was then elaborated as described for 9 and
10 to produce diazapene 19.
Table 1
MK2 and CDK2 potencies of analogs 2, 12–13, 19
Compound
number
MK2 inhibition
CDK2 inhibition
U937 TNFa release
IC50 (lM)
a
a
a
IC50
(l
M)
IC50
(lM)
2
0.04
0.012
0.001
0.005
0.7
12
13
19
0.016
0.028
0.001
0.09
0.26
0.05
0.0008
a
Values are means of at least three experiments and standard deviations were
within 50% of the reported value Assays conditions are the same as described in Ref. 1.
The potencies of the analogs prepared in Schemes 1 and 2 for
MK2, CDK2 and TNF
a production in LPS-stimulated U937 cells
are reported in Table 1. All three hinge binding replacements are
potent MK2 and CDK2 inhibitors. Furan analog 12 and pyridine
analog 19 in particular were found to be exceptionally potent
inhibitors of MK2 and had IC50 values of less than 100 nM in the
cell assay. Broad panel kinase selectivity screening of 12 was con-
were prepared. The synthesis of these analogs is shown in Scheme
3. Propargyl alcohol (20) was converted to allyl bromide 21 and
was used in the alkylation as described previously in the conver-
sion of 4 to 5. The remaining sequence of rearrangement, oxidative
cleavage of the alkene and dehydration produced 24. Analog 19
was doubly protected with boc groups and the pyridine oxidized
to form 25. Reaction with oxalyl chloride and removal of the boc
protecting groups provided intermediate 26. Suzuki coupling with
phenyl boronic acid yielded compound 27.
ducted. Potencies for a total of 109 kinases were evaluated at 1
concentration and 26 kinases (24%) showed >70% inhibition.
lM
In an attempt to improve the selectivity of these inhibitors for
MK2, compounds with aromatic substituents in the 2-position
The potencies of these analogs for MK2, CDK2 and in cell based
TNFa assay are shown in Table 2. Substitution of the furan ring did
CN
not improve selectivity for MK2 over CDK2 and a loss of overall po-
tency was observed for both kinases. Similarly, a loss of cellular po-
tency was also observed. Broad panel kinase selectivity screening
of 24 was conducted. A total of 126 kinases were profiled at
NO2
NH2
a
N
N
15
14
1
l
M concentration and 14 kinases (11%) showed >70% inhibition.
b
Substitution at the pyridine ring was less detrimental to po-
CN
tency. Less than a 10-fold drop in MK2 potency was observed com-
paring 19 to 27; however the ratio of MK2 to CDK2 potency was
improved approximately 20-fold. This improvement in selectivity
may be rationalized by the different trajectories of the aromatic
ring emanating from a 5-versus a 6-membered ring. Furthermore,
NH2
c
Br
N
CO2Me
S
N
17
16
HN
the cell potency was well below 1 lM. Compound 26 had MK2 po-
d
tency and CDK2 selectivity intermediate between 19 and 27 sug-
gesting that the size of the 2-substituent may play a role in both
potency and selectivity.
Intermediate 26 provided a convenient late stage intermediate
for facile analog synthesis via Suzuki coupling. Results are summa-
rized in Table 3.
The analogs described in Table 3 are within approximately 10-
fold in potency for MK2 indicating that most substitutions are well
tolerated. Many analogs have improved selectivity ratios compared
Br
e
N
N
NH
CO2Me
S
O
S
18
19
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) ethyl cyanoacetate, KOH, DMF; (ii) HCl;
(b) (i) NaNO2; (ii) HBr; (c) Methyl mercaptoacetate, NaOMe, MeOH; (d) t-BuONO,
CuBr2; (e) (i) (R)-propane-1,2-diamine, Pd2(dba)3 (5 mol %), ( )BINAP (10 mol %),
Cs2CO3 (2 equiv) toluene, 110 °C, 24 h; (ii) TFA/CH2Cl2; (iii) NaOMe/MeOH.