160
M. Shirdhonkar et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 478 (2009) 155–160
Table 1
singly occupied molecular orbital) transition. It should be noted
that in both systems several electronic transitions contribute to
the predicted absorption band in the UV region (300 nm).
Binding energies Eb (kcal/mol) in solution phase and atoms with spin density (Sd)
values (above 0.2) of various OH addition products of PVSO.
ꢀ
System
Eb (kcal/mol)
Sd
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
18.5
11.4
27.2
12.6
15.6
29.2
27.2
C3(0.779), C5(0.651), C1(0.573)
C6(0.807), C4(0.684), C2(0.600)
C1(0.725), C5(0.649), C3(0.647)
C2(0.800), C4(0.681), C6(0.559)
C3(0.791), C5(0.628), C1(0.514)
C8(1.154)
4. Conclusions
The ꢀOH radical reacts by addition to phenyl vinyl sulphide
forming PVS–OH adduct and its dehydration was found to be pH
dependent with complete conversion to the (PVS)ꢀ+ at pH 1
C7(1.1)
(kmax = 310, 550 nm, and e310 = 4900, e
550 = 1900 dm3 molꢀ1 cmꢀ1).
In contrast, no formation of the radical cation was seen in PVSO.
Pulse radiolysis data complemented by theoretical calculations
have proven useful in understanding the radiation induced oxida-
tion mechanism of PVS and PVSO.
(0.60) and para C2 (0.80) and C4 (O.68) sites (Table 1). On the other
hand, when the addition is to the vinyl carbon atoms (C7 or C8),
the localisation of the unpaired electron is clearly seen on the other
vinyl carbon atom. For instance, in the PVS system, when it adds to
C7, Sd = 1.15 is observed on C8 and vice versa on addition with Sd
(C7) = 0.97. Very similar features were also observed in the
PVSO–OH addition products.
Our calculations in the solution phase on binding energies pre-
dict that the (C8–OH) and (C7–OH) adducts are relatively more sta-
ble than the ring carbon addition products. For example, the most
stable product is the (C8–OH) adduct followed by the (C7–OH) ad-
duct with binding energies of 29.7 and 26.6 kcal/mol whereas the
(S1–OH) adduct is the least stable (2.1 kcal/mol) with the stabili-
ties of the ring carbon addition products lying in between. This
suggests that the OH radical preferentially adds to the vinylic car-
bons and its addition products to the ring carbons is much lower
and is not selective with nearly equal binding energies of the
(C1–C6)–OH adducts in the range 11.1–13.7 kcal/mol. Such prefer-
ential addition of hydroxyl radicals to the side chain carbon atoms
over the ring carbon atoms was also reported [35] by us in our
work on cinnamic acid derivatives.
References
ˇ ´
[1] M. Bonifacic, H. Möckel, D. Bahnemann, K.-D. Asmus, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 (1975) 675.
[2] K. Kishore, K.-D. Asmus, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1989) 2079.
[3] B.C. Gilbert, R.O.C. Norman, R.C. Sealy, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1975) 303.
[4] K.-D. Asmus, Acc. Chem. Res. 12 (1979) 436.
[5] H. Yokoi, A. Hatta, K. Ishiguro, Y. Sawaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 12728.
[6] Y. Yagchi, W. Schnabel, A. Wilpert, J. Bendig, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 90
(1994) 287.
[7] M. Ioele, S. Steenken, E. Baciocchi, J. Phys. Chem. A 101 (1997) 2979.
[8] H. Mohan, J.P. Mittal, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 6574.
[9] T. Sumiyoshi, M. Kawasaki, M. Katayama, Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 66 (1993)
2510.
[10] T. Sumiyoshi, H. Sakai, M. Kawasaki, M. Katayama, Chem. Lett. 21 (1992) 617.
[11] M. Jonsson, J. Lind, G. Merenyi, T.E. Eriksen, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
(1995) 67.
[12] D.K. Maity, H. Mohan, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1993) 2229.
[13] P.-Y. Jiang, Y. Katsumura, R. Nagaishi, M. Domae, K. Ishikawa, K. Ishigure, Y.
Yoshida, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 88 (1992) 1653.
[14] M. Domae, Y. Katsumura, P.-Y. Jiang, R. Nagaishi, K. Ishigure, T. Kozawa, Y.
Yoshida, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92 (1996) 2245.
[15] T.N. Das, J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (2005) 3344.
An interesting finding is the dissociative reaction channel ob-
served (reaction1, structure 3, Scheme 2) in the case of the ipso
carbon OH adduct of PVSO. When the gas phase ipso OH adduct
was reoptimised by including the solvent effect, the dissociation
of the bond between sulphur and ipso carbon was observed. A
product with hydrogen bond between the H atom from the hydro-
xyl group attached to the ring and the O atom of the sulphoxide
group (Fig. 7C1) was seen.
Excited state calculations were carried out at TDDFT (BHHLYP)
level of theory by both Onsager reaction field and PCM models.
The optical absorption maxima for the PVS radical cation in solu-
tion using the former procedure are predicted at 295 and 450 nm
which are blue shifted by 15 and 100 nm, respectively from the
experimental values (310 and 550 nm). However, the excited
states calculations with the PCM model have shown the maxima
at 295 and 610 nm and the band at 610 nm is now 60 nm red
shifted. Similar calculations for the PVSO radical cation predicted
the maxima at 303 and 612 nm which are blue shifted from exper-
imental values (330 and 650 nm). Furthermore, the bands at the
longer wavelength were found to be mainly due to the HDOMO-
2 (Highest doubly occupied molecular orbital) ? LSOMO (Lowest
[16] H. Mohan, J.P. Mittal, Chem. Phys. Lett. 364 (2002) 599.
[17] H. Mohan, J.P. Mittal, in: C.D. Jonah, B.S.M. Rao (Eds.), Radiation Chemistry:
Present Status and Future Trends, Elsevier Science, New York, 2001, p. 223.
[18] M. Shirdhonkar, H. Mohan, D.K. Maity, B.S.M. Rao, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A
195 (2008) 277.
[19] K. Bobrowski, N.V. Raghavan, J. Phys. Chem. 86 (1982) 4432.
[20] K. Bobrowski, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 80 (1984) 1377.
[21] M.C. Carreno, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 1717.
[22] I. Fernandez, N. Khiar, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 3651.
[23] M.J. Clarke, F. Zhu, D.R. Frasca, Chem. Rev. 99 (1999) 2511.
[24] J.M. Shin, Y.M. Cho, G. Sachs, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 7800.
[25] R. Bentley, Chem. Soc. Rev. 34 (2005) 609.
[26] P. Charlesworth, W. Lee, W.S. Jenks, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 15152.
[27] E. Baciocchi, T.D. Giacco, M.F. Gerini, O. Lanzalunga, J. Phys. Chem. A 110
(2006) 9940.
[28] B.S.M. Rao, P. Yadav, M.S. Kulkarni, M.B. Shirdhonkar, Curr. Sci. 92 (2007) 599.
[29] ICRU Report, The Dosimetry of Pulsed Radiation, ICRU Publications, vol. 34,
1982.
[30] D.K. Maity, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 5716.
[31] D.K. Maity, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 8321.
[32] M.J. Frisch et al., GAUSSIAN 03, Revision C.02, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT,
2004.
[33] G. Schaftenaar, J.H. Noordik, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 14 (2000) 123.
[34] A. Korzeniowska-Sobczuk, G.L. Hug, L. Carmichael, K. Bobrowski, J. Phys. Chem.
A 106 (2002) 9251.
[35] P. Yadav, H. Mohan, D.K. Maity, C.H. Suresh, B.S.M. Rao, Chem. Phys. 351 (2008)
57.