prepared via pyran annulation as previously described.11 The
exomethylene was used to introduce the requisite C7
oxygenation by ozonolysis followed by NaBH4 reduction
(94%) to give the C7 alcohol 4 as a single diastereomer.
Temporary protection of the alcohol as its TMS derivative14
was followed by Bunnelle reaction15 to give the desired
hydroxy allylsilane 5 in 71% yield.
Pyran annulation between 5 and C-ring enal 6 using our
standard conditions of TMSOTf in ether gave the desired
tricyclic adduct, as a single diastereomer, in 92% isolated
yield. Protection of the C7 OH using TBSOTf and 2,6-
lutidine gave 7 in 98% yield.
Figure 1. Structures of bryostatin 1 and PMA.
Aldol condensation with methyl glyoxylate gave a dia-
stereomeric mixture of aldol products (92%) which under-
went elimination (93%) by treatment with Ac2O and DMAP
in pyridine at 60 °C. The resulting enoate 8 was then
subjected to Luche reduction16 followed by acylation with
octanoic anhydride to give 9. Selective removal of the BPS
(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl) group at C1 using TBAF and HOAc
in DMF (89%) was followed by oxidation to the acid 10
(quantitative yield over 2 steps) by sequential Parikh-
Doering17 and Pinnick18 oxidations. Removal of both TBS
groups (at C7 and C25) using HF·Py then gave the corre-
sponding dihydroxy acid.
linked to PKC activation.6 Bryostatin 1 (1), isolated by Pettit
from the marine bryozoan Bugula neritina, is also a potent
activator of PKC.7 However, unlike most phorbol esters,
bryostatin 1 is not tumor promoting and antagonizes many
of the responses induced by the phorbol esters. Bryostatin 1
has potent activity toward a number of cancer cell lines,
displays immunostimulant effects,8 and shows promise in
the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.9,3 Recently, bryostatin
1 has also been shown to induce repair of neuronal damage
resulting from stroke.10
Attempted macrolactonization of this dihydroxy acid using
the Yamaguchi protocol19 afforded a macrolactone in which
the C7 alcohol had also been acylated by 2,4,6-trichloroben-
zoyl chloride, in excellent (79%) yield. To preclude the
undesired acylation of C7, this hydroxyl was selectively
protected by reaction with TESCl and DMAP to give 11;
the Yamaguchi reaction then afforded the desired macro-
lactone 12. Removal of the TES group followed by acety-
lation gave the desired C7 acetate derivative 13 (95% over 2
steps). Finally, protecting group removal (DDQ then LiBF4
in aqueous CH3CN) gave analogue Merle 27 (87% over 2
steps). The C7 trichlorobenzoate derivative obtained inadvert-
ently was also carried through a parallel sequence to give
analogue 14.
In an effort to identify the mechanisms responsible for
the unique activity of bryostatin 1, we are attempting to
determine, through chemical synthesis, the structural features
of bryostatin that are responsible for its unique biological
profile. Recently, we have prepared and evaluated analogues
(Merle 21-2311 and Merle 28,12 vide infra) which now limit
the functionality largely responsible for the unique biological
profile exhibited by bryostatin 1 to that present in the C7-C9
region of the A-ring.13 In this paper, we report studies which
rule out the A-ring C7 acetate as being the critical determinant
of the unique biological responses characteristic of bryostatin
1, through synthesis and biological evaluation of analogue
Merle 27. The preparation of this new bryopyran is outlined
in Scheme 1.
Analogue Merle 27 was found to bind to PKC with slightly
lower affinity than that of Merle 21-23 (Ki ) 3.0 ( 0.6
nM with PKCR). Assays for differential response were
conducted using leukemia U937 cells.20 In this assay, PMA
inhibits cell proliferation and induces attachment. Bryostatin
1 has much less effect on either response and blocks the
effect of the phorbol ester when both agents are administered
together. The results are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Results
Analogue Merle 27 was prepared using a convergent pyran
annulation strategy to unite preformed A- and C-rings with
concomitant formation of the B-ring, as shown in Scheme
1. Preparation of the A-ring pyran began with pyran 3,
(6) Castagna, M.; Takai, Y.; Kaibuchi, K.; Sano, K.; Kikkawa, U.;
Nishizuka, Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 7847–7851.
(7) Pettit, G. R.; Herald, C. L.; Douobek, D. L.; Herald, D. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6846–6848.
(8) Koutcher, J. A.; Motwani, M.; Zakian, K. L.; Li, X.-K.; Matei, C.;
Dyke, J. P.; Ballon, D.; Yoo, H.-H.; Schwartz, G. K. Clin. Cancer Res.
2000, 6, 1498–1507.
(14) Stereochemistry at C7 was confirmed at this point by observation
of NOEs between the axial proton at C7 and those at C5 and C9.
(15) Bunnelle, W. H.; Narayanan, B. A. Organic Syntheses; Wiley &
Sons: New York, 1993; Collect. Vol. 8, pp 602-605.
(16) (a) Luche, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2226–2667. (b)
Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Bennet, C. E.; Bi, F. C.; Brenner, S. E.; Clarke,
M. O.; Horan, J. C.; Kan, C.; Lacote, E.; Lippa, B.; Nell, P. G.; Turner,
T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13648–13649.
(9) (a) Etcheberrigaray, R.; Tan, M.; Dewachter, I.; Kuiperi, C.; Van
der Au; wera, I.; Wera, S.; Qiao, L.; Bank, B.; Nelson, T. J.; Kozikowski,
A. P.; Van Leuven, F.; Alkon, D. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 2004,
101, 11141–11146
.
(10) Sun, M.-K.; Hongpaisan, J.; Nelson, T. J.; Alkon, D. L. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 2008, 105, 13620–13625.
(11) Keck, G. E.; Kraft, M. B.; Truong, A. P.; Li, W.; Sanchez, C. C.;
Kedei, N.; Lewin, N.; Blumberg, P. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6660–
6661.
(17) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. v. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5505–
5507.
(18) Bal, B. S.; Childers, W. E., Jr.; Pinnick, H. W. Tetrahedron 1981,
37, 2091–2096.
(12) Keck, G. E.; Poudel, Y. B.; Welch, D. S.; Kraft, M. B.; Truong,
A. P.; Stephens, J. C.; Kedei, N.; Lewin, N. E.; Blumberg, P. M. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 593–596.
(19) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989–1993.
(13) Here we adopt permanent identifiers (“Merle numbers”) for these
analogues which will remain invariant from publication to publication.
(20) Vrana, J. A.; Saunders, A. M.; Srikumar, P. C.; Grant, S.
Differentiation 1998, 63, 33–42.
2278
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009