G Model
CATTOD-8924; No. of Pages4
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
Y. Brusentsev, P. Eklund / Catalysis Today xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
to dryness. The residue was purified by flash chromatog-
O
MeO
HO
8'
8
raphy in chloroform to give product as
a
colorless solid.
O
O
Starting material (diol)
Product (dimesylate)
Yield, %
PPh2
PPh2
HO
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
96
62
95
97
O
OMe
OH
(-)-DIOP
2.4. Sodium diphenylphosphide
(-)-Hydroxymatairesinol
To a solution of diphenylphosphine (50 mmol, 8.7 ml) in dry THF
(30 ml) sodium metal (52 mmol, 1.2 g) was added as small pieces
over 1.5 h. The mixture was stirred for 6 h until all sodium was
dissolved and the solution of the sodium diphenylphosphide was
diluted with dry THF to 50 ml.
Fig. 1. Similarity in stereochemistry for DIOP and hydroxymatairesinol.
butyrolactone ring which provides a number of possible derivatives
and backbones.
2. Experimental
2.5. General method for preparation of the phosphines (13, 14,
15, 16) (Scheme 3)
2.1. General methods
Dimesylate (9, 10, 11 or 12) (0.5 mmol) was dissolved in
THF (30 ml) and 1 M THF solution of the sodium diphenylphos-
phide (1.5 ml, 1.5 mmol) was added dropwize. The mixture
was stirred for 18 h at room temperature and then it was
concentrated to dryness. The residue was purified by flash chro-
matography to give the target diphosphine as a colorless solid.
Unless otherwise stated, chemicals were obtained from com-
mercial suppliers and used without further purification.
A
knotwood extract containing hydroxymatairesinol was supplied by
UPM Ltd. THF and toluene were dried by the sodium-benzophenone
method immediately prior to use. DMF and DCM were dried by dis-
tilling from CaH2. NMR spectra were recorded with Bruker Avance
600 MHz NMR spectrometer using standard pulse sequences. Chi-
ral HPLC analyses were performed with a HPLC chromatograph
equipped with a Daicel HPLC column Chiralcel OD-H. Chiral GC
analyses were performed with a gas chromatograph equipped with
a Varian capillary column CP-Chirasil-Dex CB. HRMS were recorded
using a Bruker Micro Q-TOF instrument with ESI (electorspray ion-
ization) operated in positive mode. The reactions were monitored
by TLC. Aluminum based TLC plates (Merck) silicagel 60 F254 were
used.
Starting material (dimesylate)
Product (diphosphine)
Yield, %
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
90
87
91
88
2.6. General method for asymmetric hydrogenation reaction
2.6.1. Preparation of the stock solution of the catalyst
Dichloro-tetraethylene-dirhodium (14 mg, 0.035 mmol) was
dissolved in THF (2 ml) and phosphine (13, 14, 15 or 16)
(0.074 mmol) was added in one portion. The reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The prepared solution of the
catalyst had a concentration of 0.035 M.
Analytical data for the prepared compounds (NMR, HRMS, ele-
chromatograms) are presented in Supporting Information (SI).
2.2. General method for preparation of diols (5, 6, 7, 8)
(Scheme 2)
2.6.2. Catalytic reaction
Lactone (1, 2, 3 or 4) (5 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahy-
drofuran (30 ml) and the solution was cooled down to 0 ◦C.
Lithium aluminum hydride (2.5 ml of 4 M solution in Et2O,
10 mmol) was added dropwise over a period of 0.5 h. The reac-
tion mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. Then 1 ml
of 10% NaOH in water was added carefully drop by drop and
the suspension was filtered and the precipitate was washed
with hot THF. The filtrates were combined and the solvent was
evaporated to give the final product (5, 6, 7 or 8) as a white powder.
Substrate 18 (0.7 mmol, 154 mg) or 20 (0.7 mmol, 114 mg) was
dissolved in methanol (2 ml) and stock solution of the catalyst was
added (0.1 ml, 0.5 mol %, or 0.2 ml, 1 mol %). Hydrogen was bubbled
through the solution for 1 h. The reaction mixture was analyzed
by GCMS and by chiral GC. All conversions were over 95%. The
selectivities of the reactions are presented in Tables 1 and 2.
3. Results and discussion
Starting material (lactone)
Product (diol)
Yield, %
To prepare a diverse scope of lignan-derived phosphines,
hydroxymatairesinol was transformed into four different lactones
by methods described in our previous publications (Scheme 1) [8,9].
In short, dimethylmatairesinol (1) was prepared from hydroxy-
followed by methylation of the phenolic hydroxyls. Dimethyl-
conidendrin (2) was obtained by methylation of the phenolic
hydroxyls of the lignan conidendrin, which forms quantitatively
prepared from 1 by intramolecular oxidative coupling mediated
by vanadium oxyfluoride. For preparation of the macrocyclic com-
pound 4, the phenolic groups of matairesinol were first allylated
and then cyclized by ring-closing metathesis, followed by hydro-
genation of the double bond [9].
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
88
87
75
74
2.3. General method for preparation of dimesylates (9, 10, 11,
12) (Scheme 3)
Diol (5, 6, 7 or 8) (1 mmol) was dissolved in DCM (20 ml)
and TEA (0.35 ml, 2.5 mmol) was added followed by addition
of mesyl chloride (0.17 ml, 2.2 mmol). The mixture was stirred
at room temperature for 16 h and then it was washed with
water (2 × 30 ml), dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated
Please cite this article in press as: Y. Brusentsev, P. Eklund, Synthesis and applications of diphosphine ligands derived from the lignan