species to furnish the completed core of 1. Pentacycle 2 was
expected to arise from indole lactam 3 wherein formation
of the desired C16 quaternary center and indole ring system
occur through sequential substrate-controlled alkylation and
indolization reactions, respectively, applied to ꢀ-keto lactam
4. Further antithetic simplification revealed that 4 could
possibly evolve from a cis-divinylcyclopropane rearrange-
ment of cyclopropyl lactam 5, which in turn would arise via
an intramolecular cyclopropanation of dienyl diazoacetoac-
etamide 6.
Scheme 2. Preparation of Dienyl Diazoacetoacetamide 6
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis to 1
to be comprised of C-H insertion products (11 and 12), in
addition to the desired cyclopropanation product (5). After
a survey of reaction parameters it was realized that copper(II)
bis(salicylidene-tert-butylamine)13 [Cu(TBS)2] effectively
promoted the cyclopropanation of 6.11,14 In the event, slow
addition of 6 to a solution of 10 mol % Cu(TBS)2 in 1,2-
dichloroethane induced the formation of the desired
3-azabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-2-one system (5) as a single di-
astereomer, albeit in 50-60% yield.15
To construct the [6,7]-fused bicyclic lactam 4, ketone 5
was initially treated under soft enolization conditions (with
TBSOTf and Et3N) at -40 °C (Scheme 4).16,17 The resultant
enoxysilane (13) was thus poised to intercept the 1,1-
disubstituted olefin in a divinylcyclopropane rearrangement.
Accordingly, subsequent warming of enoxysilane 13 to
ambient temperatures promoted the facile [3,3]-sigmatropic
rearrangement (13 f 14), thereby unveiling 4 as a mixture
of keto-/enol-tautomers.18 The release of ring strain associ-
ated with a cyclopropane in conjunction with the syn-
stereochemical predisposition of the enoxysilane and vinyl
moiety facilitated the [3,3]-sigmatropic process.17
The synthesis commenced with the efficient and expedient
preparation of dienyl diazoacetoacetamide 6, a requisite
precursor for constructing the [6,7]-fused ꢀ-keto lactam 5
(Scheme 2). Accordingly, homopropargylic silyl ether6 7 was
treated with Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst, 4-bromo-
1-butene, and ethylene gas to furnish the bromo diene 8 via
an enyne cross-metathesis reaction.7-9 Displacement of the
bromide with benzylamine (8 f 9),10 followed by acetoac-
etamide formation using diketene (9 f 10) and a standard
Regitz diazotransfer reaction using Et3N and p-acetamido-
benzenesulfonyl azide11 (p-ABSA), afforded 6 in 75% yield
over three steps.
(12) For studies on the cyclopropanation of diazoacetamides, see: (a)
Doyle, M. P.; Eismont, M. Y.; Protopopova, M. N.; Kwan, M. M. Y
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1665–1674. (b) Doyle, M. P; Austin, R. E.; Bailey,
A. S.; Dwyer, M. P.; Dyatkin, A. B.; Kalinin, A. V.; Kwan, M. M. Y.;
Liras, S.; Oalmann, C. J.; Pieters, R. J.; Protopopova, M. N.; Raab, C. E.;
Roos, G. H. P.; Zhou, Q.-L.; Martin, S. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
5763–5775.
Following the successful synthesis of 6, the metal-
catalyzed cyclopropanation reaction was investigated (Scheme
3).12 To this end, 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction
mixtures produced upon reaction of 6 in the presence of
various achiral rhodium- or copper-based catalysts clearly
indicated the presence of complex mixtures that appeared
(13) For synthesis of Cu(TBS)2, see: Charles, R. G. J. Org. Chem. 1957,
22, 677–679.
(14) Under these conditions only minimal quantities of side products
(5) For examples of amine trapping of indole-quinonemethide species,
see: (a) Magnus, P.; Sear, N. L.; Kim, C. S.; Vicker, N J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 70–78. (b) Ohshima, T.; Xu, Y.; Takita, R.; Shibasaki, M.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9569–9588. (c) Ohori, K.; Shimizu, S.; Ohshima,
T.; Shibasaki, M. Chirality 2000, 12, 400–403.
were observed.
(15) These conditions remain unoptimized, and current efforts are
focusing on both improving efficiency and utilizing chiral metal catalysts
to induce asymmetry.
(16) (a) Simchen, G.; Kober, W. Synthesis 1976, 259–261. (b) Koba-
yashi, M.; Masumoto, K.; Nakai, E.; Nakai, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
(6) Nicolaou, K. C.; Lizos, D. E.; Kim, D. W.; Schlawe, D.; de Noronha,
R. G.; Longbottom, D. A.; Rodriquez, M.; Bucci, M.; Cirino, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4460–4470.
3005–3008
.
(17) For a review on the use enoxysilane formation with silyl triflates,
see: Emde, H.; Domsch, D.; Feger, H.; Frick, U.; Gotz, A.; Hergott, H. H.;
Hofmann, K.; Kober, W.; Kra¨geloh, K.; Oesterle, T.; Steppan, W.; West,
(7) Lee, H. -Y.; Kim, B. G.; Snapper, M. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1855–
1853
.
(8) For a review on enyne cross-metathesis, see: Diver, S. T.; Giessert,
A. J. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 1317–1382
(9) Importantly, bromo diene 8 was produced in 60%-80% yield with
exclusive trans-olefin selectivity under these reaction conditions
W.; Simchen, G. Synthesis 1982, 1–26.
.
(18) For some examples of enoxysilane-mediated divinylcyclopropane
rearrangement in the synthesis of functionalized cycloheptene rings, see:
(a) Piers, E.; Burmeister, M. S.; Reissig, H.-U. Can. J. Chem. 1986, 64,
180–187. (b) Piers, E.; Jung, G. L. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 1668–1675.
(c) Piers, E.; Jung, G. L.; Ruediger, E. H. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 670–
682. (d) Hudlicky, T.; Nguyen, P. V. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1933–1935.
(e) Fox, M. E.; Li, C.; Marino, J. P., Jr.; Overman, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 5467–5480.
.
(10) Amine displacement of homoallylic dienyl bromide was adapted
from: Arnold, H.; Overman, L. E.; Sharp, M. J.; Witschel, M. C. Org. Synth.
1992, 70, 111–118.
(11) Baum, J. S.; Shook, D. A.; Davies, H. M. L.; Smith, D. Synth.
Commun. 1987, 17, 1709–1716.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 20, 2009
4533