J. O. Jeppesen, E. Levillain, L. Sanguinet et al.
least under non-competitive conditions, and to induce a con-
formational flip between the limiting 1,3-alternate and cone
conformations.[16,25] The progressive addition of chloride
anions to a solution of the mono-TTF calix[4]pyrroles 1 and
2 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature revealed features that are
consistent with chloride anion binding. These studies also
provided evidence for an exchange rate that is slow on the
CV time scale. For instance, the addition of 0.4 equivalent
of chloride anions (as the tetrabutylammonium salt) to a so-
lution of the mono-TTF calix[4]pyrrole 2 in CH2Cl2 was ob-
served (Figure 2) to give rise to a new peak in the region
reveal any observable shifts in the waves ascribed to the
first oxidation process.
The above background studies completed, SAMs derived
from receptors 1 and 2 and model compounds 8 and 9 were
prepared. Towards this end, the acetyl protecting groups
present in compounds 1, 2, 8, and 9 were removed to afford
the corresponding thiols; this was done by treating with
CsOH·H2O in a mixture of THF and MeOH.[27] The SAMs
themselves were then obtained by immersing homemade
gold substrates[28] for 12 h into CH2Cl2 solutions (1 mm) con-
taining the thiol in question under an anhydrous, oxygen-
free (<1 ppm) argon atmosphere. The SAMs prepared from
compounds 1, 2, 8, and 9 were stable as confirmed by CV by
scanning over repetitive cycles.[29] The CVs of the SAMs did
not shown any shift between the oxidation and the reduction
peaks. Moreover, linear dependencies between peak intensi-
ties and scan rates were observed for all four systems. Both
observations are considered characteristic of an immobilized
redox system.[30]
A comparison of the surface coverage obtained for the
SAMs prepared from the two MPTTF model compounds 8
and 9 with those obtained for the SAMs derived from the
TTF calix[4]pyrroles 1 and 2 revealed that the MPTTF
model compounds have a value which is almost three times
higher (i.e., (1.9Æ0.2ꢂ10À10) molcmÀ2 and (0.7Æ0.1ꢂ
10À10) molcmÀ2 for 8 and 1, respectively[31]). Based on Cory–
Pauling–Koltun (CPK) models, the area per molecule for 8
and 1 were estimated to be (49Æ7) and (79Æ11) ꢃ2, respec-
tively. On this basis, it was concluded that the TTF calix[4]-
pyrroles were not organized as close to the monolayer sur-
face as were the control mono-pyrroles.
Figure 2. CVs of receptor 2 (CH2Cl2, 0.5 mm) obtained by adding increas-
ing quantities of a concentrated CH2Cl2 solution of nBu4NCl containing
0.5 mm 2 so as to counter potential dilution effects (Reference electrode
Fc/Fc+ with nBu4NPF6 (0.1m) as the supporting electrolyte; on Pt at
0.2 VsÀ1).
As true in case of the predicative solution phase analyses
(vide supra), CV was used to probe the changes in the
redox potentials of the SAMs prepared from compounds 1,
2, 8, and 9 as a function of chloride anions. Although, it was
expected that addition of chloride anions to the SAMs de-
rived from the two MPTTF model compounds 8 and 9
would lead only to a minor negative shift of the first TTF-
centered oxidation process, it was actually found that addi-
corresponding to the first oxidation process.[26] This new
peak, at E1/21 =À0.13 V (vs. Fc/Fc+), is ascribed to oxidation
of the supramolecular complex formed from this receptor
and chloride anions (i.e., 2·ClÀ). Further addition of chloride
anions caused the intensity of the peak at E1/21 =+0.03 V
(vs. Fc/Fc+), corresponding to oxidation of the uncomplexed
mono-TTF calix[4]pyrrole 2, to decrease along with a con-
tion of a large amount of chloride anions to the SAMs in-
1
1
current increase in the intensity of the peak at E1/2
=
duced
a
small, but significant positive shift (DE1/2
=
À0.13 V (vs. Fc/Fc+) ascribed to 2·ClÀ. After addition of ca.
1 equivalent of chloride anions to the mono-TTF calix[4]-
pyrrole 2, the peak at E1/21 =+0.03 V (vs. Fc/Fc+) could no
longer be observed and only the peak at E1/21 =À0.13 V (vs.
Fc/Fc+) was seen in the voltammogram. From this point for-
ward, further addition of chloride anions to compound 2 re-
sulted in little observable change. This is taken as evidence
that a strong binding interaction exists between the mono-
TTF calix[4]pyrrole 2 and chloride anions under the condi-
tions of the CV experiment. Similar results were obtained
when the mono-TTF calix[4]pyrrole 1 was studied in the
presence of chloride anions, with the maximum displace-
ment of the first oxidation potentials being DE1/21 =À0.16 V
and À0.17 V for compounds 1 and 2, respectively. Control
experiments, involving analogous titrations of the MPTTF
model compounds 8 and 9 with chloride anions, did not
+15 mV) to the corresponding waves. This observation,
which remains somewhat recondite, stands in marked con-
trast to what is seen in the case of the SAMs derived from
the TTF calix[4]pyrroles 1 and 2. Here, the progressive addi-
tion of chloride anions between 0 and 0.5 mm[32] induced
1
(Figure 3) a significant negative shift (DE1/2 ꢀÀ30 mV) in
the first TTF-centered oxidation waves.
A comparison of the maximum negative shifts induced by
the addition of chloride anions to a solution of the TTF cal-
ix[4]pyrrole 2 (DE1/21 =À170 mV) and to the SAM derived
from it (DE1/21 =À30 mV) reveals that the chloride anion in-
duced shift is much smaller in the case of the supported
system than in solution. This observation is rationalized by
the fact that immobilization of the TTF calix[4]pyrrole re-
ceptor renders more difficult the conformational change
from a 1,3-alternate conformation to the cone conformation
8130
ꢁ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 8128 – 8133