Total Synthesis of Bisanthraquinone Antibiotic BE-43472B
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 10. Construction of Quinone Dienophiles 48 and 55a
transition state TS-56′ that was expected to form the desired
adduct 47 as shown in Scheme 11. The stereochemistry of
compounds 57 and 58a/58b could not be completely discerned
through NMR spectroscopy. It was presumed to be as shown
on the basis of the most favorable facial orientation of diene
34 and dienophile 48 as they merge through transition state TS-
56 (Scheme 11) to form the Diels-Alder product 57. However,
from these failed experiments we drew the conclusion that the
electronic (-I) effect of the electron-withdrawing anthraquinone
substituent attached onto the juglone dienophile overrides the
polarizing effect of the intramolecular H-bond within this
system,23 enlarging the C-3 orbital coefficient of the LUMO of
the juglone system. The overall polarized characters of diene
34 and dienophile 48 (as shown in 34′ and 48′, Scheme 11)
dictate the regiochemical outcome of their union to afford
cycloadduct 57. This path-pointing study led us to the next phase
of our campaign toward the total synthesis of antibiotic BE-
43472B (1).
Final Diels-Alder Approach: Total Synthesis of Antibiotic
BE-43472B. Based on the latest intelligence gathering, we
redesigned our second-generation Diels-Alder strategy toward
the target molecule in order to accommodate the realities of
the electronics within the dienophile component of the cycload-
dition reaction. Scheme 12 outlines, in retrosynthetic format,
the newly devised synthetic strategy. Note that in this scheme
we again use the antipodal structure [(-)-1] of the natural
product (we will switch to the structure of the enantiomer (+)-1
in our final drive toward BE-43472B). The main provision in
this plan was the adoption of diene (S)-61 (with a 2-oxa as
opposed to a 1-oxa substituent), which was expected to possess
the reverse polarity (enlargement of the C-1 orbital coefficient
of the HOMO) from that of the originally used diene (34) and,
therefore, match the demonstrated polarity of dienophile 55 (see
Scheme 12). The adoption of (S)-61, in turn, required placement
of an oxygen atom at C-2 within the Diels-Alder product (ent-
60) that would have to be removed subsequently. Additionally,
two new oxygen atoms will have to be introduced into the
emerging structures (ent-60 and ent-59) at C-3 and C-1 before
reaching (-)-1. Another interesting feature of the new synthetic
design was the choice of the naked dienophile 55, whose
anthraquinone intramolecular H-bonding was expected to fa-
cilitate the intended intramolecular ipso substitution in order to
cast the last bond of the ring framework of the target molecule.
These new design modifications highlighted our expectations
for success with the possibility of a cascade sequence, beginning
with the Diels-Alder reaction and ending with an octacyclic
structure whose molecular complexity would be impressively
close to that of the targeted natural product.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) LiHMDS (2.2 equiv), NBS (2.2 equiv),
THF, 0 f 25 °C, 1 h, 98%; (b) DBU (1.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 12 h; (c)
Me2SO4 (1.2 equiv), Cs2CO3 (1.2 equiv), acetone, reflux, 5 h, 74% over
the two steps; (d) CAN (2.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, MeCN, H2O, 0 °C, 30 min,
77%; (e) Pd(PPh3)4 (0.1 equiv), Me3SnSnMe3 (1.5 equiv), toluene, 110 °C,
2 h, 94%; (f) 53 (1.0 equiv), 54 (1.5 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.1 equiv), CuI
(0.2 equiv), THF, 70 °C, 22 h, 65%; (g) 1% HCl in MeOH, CH2Cl2, 25 °C,
16 h, 85%.
of 34 (4.0 equiv) with 48 (1.0 equiv) in benzene at 80 °C for
72 h furnished a single Diels-Alder adduct whose structure
was determined, through subsequent chemistry and NMR
spectroscopy, to be that of the undesired regioisomer 57.21,22
Interestingly, the silylated dienes 33a and 33b (prepared through
a route similar to that shown in Scheme 5 for 33a) failed to
react with dienophile quinone 48 under various conditions,
presumably due to steric hindrance, underscoring the relevance
of the free secondary alcohol in the diene system to the success
of the Diels-Alder reaction. Exposure of adduct 57 to the action
of ZnBr2 resulted in the simultaneous removal of the MOM
and MEM protecting groups and the formation of the isomeric
heptacyclic lactols 58a and 58b (84% yield, ca. 1:1 ratio, not
separable by chromatography). Their structures were determined
through 1H NMR ROESY studies that revealed the NOEs
indicated on their structures in Scheme 11. Manual molecular
models are supportive of the rotational barrier between these
two atropisomeric structures (58a and 58b). These studies also
provided the crucial evidence for the regioisomeric nature of
the Diels-Alder adduct 57, apparently formed through endo
transition state TS-56 which is favored over its regioisomeric
The required diene (S)-61 became readily available through
the concise synthetic route summarized in Scheme 13. Reaction
of commercially available phosphorane 62 with known aldehyde
(S)-(-)-30b24 gave R,ꢀ-unsaturated ester (S)-63 in 92% yield
(E:Z > 98:2), which was converted first to Weinreb amide (S)-
64 through the action of HNMe(OMe) and Me2AlCl and then
to methyl ketone (S)-65 by reaction with MeLi (77% yield for
the two steps).25 Desilylation of the latter compound with TBAF
(21) (a) Tietze, L. F.; Gericke, K. M.; Singidi, R. R.; Schuberth, I. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 1191. (b) Boeckman, R. K., Jr.; Dolak, T. M.;
Culos, K. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 7098. (c) Kelly, T. R.;
Montury, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 45, 4311. (d) Trost, B. M.; Ippen,
J.; Vladuchick, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 8116.
(23) Rozeboom, M. D.; Tegmo-Larsson, I.-M.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem.
1981, 46, 2338.
(24) Marshall, J. A.; Yanik, M. M.; Adams, N. D.; Ellis, K. C.; Chobanian,
H. R. Org. Synth. 2005, 81, 157.
(22) For Diels-Alder reactions with similar chiral 1,3-dienes, see: (a)
Barriault, L.; Thomas, J. D. O.; Cle´ment, R. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
2317. (b) Carren˜o, M. C.; Garcia´-Cerrada, S.; Urbano, A.; Di Vitta,
C. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4355. (c) Reference 12a.
(25) (a) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815. (b)
Sibi, M. P. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1993, 25, 15. (c) Mentzel, M.;
Hoffmann, H. M. R. J. Prakt. Chem. 1997, 339, 517. (d) Singh, J.;
Satyamurthi, N.; Aidhen, I. S. J. Prakt. Chem. 2000, 342, 340.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 41, 2009 14819