C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
where g1 and g2 ()ge) are the Zeeman factors, λ is the spin-orbit
coupling parameter, ∆ is the axial orbital splitting parameter, and
R is an orbital reduction parameter.9 A good fit of the experimental
data was obtained (for J′ ) 0 cm-1) with J ) +1.2 cm-1, g1 )
2.20, λ ) -130 cm-1, ∆ ) 120 cm-1, and R ) 1.10 for 2 and λ
) -109 cm-1, ∆ ) 239 cm-1, and R ) 1.10 for 2ox. The axial
orbital splitting of the terminal HS CoII ions for 2ox is greater than
that for 2, likely reflecting a larger distortion of the octahedral
geometry. The weak but nonnegligible ferromagnetic coupling
between the central LS CoII ion and the terminal HS CoII ions for
2, in spite of the moderately large intramolecular metal-metal
separation (∼7 Å), suggests that the exchange interaction involves
a spin polarization mechanism through the m-phenylene spacers,
as in 1 (J ) +1.0 cm-1).4
Figure 2. (a) Co K-edge XANES spectra of 2 (solid line) and 2ox (bold
line) compared with that of 1 (dashed line). The inset shows the pre-edge
region. (b) Temperature dependence of ꢀMT for 2 (2) and 2ox (4). The
inset shows the low-temperature region (the solid lines are the best-fit
curves).
In conclusion, the heterotritopic nature of the tailored ligand
obmpox6- allows for the side-by-side self-assembly of Co2+ ions
to afford two unique examples of homo- and heterovalent mixed-
spin trinuclear triple mesocates under either anaerobic and
aerobic conditions, respectively. The spins of the metal centers
are ferromagnetically coupled in the homovalent tricobalt(II)
mesocate (“ON” state), whereas they are uncoupled in the
heterovalent tricobalt(II,III,II) mesocate (“OFF” state). Current
efforts are devoted to the synthesis of other examples of oligo-
m-phenylene oxalamide mesocates as potential candidates for
electrically triggered magnetic molecular switches.
(HS)CoII(LS)CoII(HS) and heterovalent CoII(HS)CoIII(LS)CoII(HS)
formulations, respectively (Figure 2a). Notably, the asymmetry and
broadness of the intense edge features corresponding to the 1s f
4p transitions for 2 and 2ox in comparison with those of 1 indicate
the coexistence of different spin and/or oxidation states for the
terminal and central metal ions. Moreover, a shift to higher energy
is observed for the main broad peak centered at 7729.0 eV in 2ox
relative to the corresponding one centered at 7727.0 eV in 2, which
is in turn close in energy to the main sharp peak located at 7726.5
eV in 1. This hypsochromic energy shift of 2.0 eV in 2ox results
mainly from the increase in binding energy of the 1s core electrons
as the oxidation state of the central metal ion increases. Thus, the
main peak of the weak pre-edge features corresponding to the 1s
f 3d transitions appears similarly shifted at higher energy from
7710.4 eV in 1 and 2 to 7710.6 eV in 2ox. Similar oxidation-state-
dependent edge and/or pre-edge shifts have been reported for other
octahedral cobalt complexes.8
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Ministerio
de Educacio´n y Ciencia (MEC, Spain) (Projects CTQ2007-
61690, CSD2007-00010, and MAT2007-60660), the Generalitat
Valenciana (GV, Spain) (Project PROMETEO/2009/108), and
the Ministe`re de l’Enseignement Supe´rieur et de la Recherche
(MESR, France). E.P. and M.-C.D. thank the MEC and MESR
for grants.
The plots of ꢀMT versus T (where ꢀM is the molar magnetic
susceptibility per Co3 unit and T the temperature) for 2 and 2ox are
consistent with ferromagnetically coupled CoII(HS)CoII(LS)CoII(HS)
and uncoupled CoII(HS)CoIII(LS)CoII(HS) linear triads, respectively
(Figure 2b). The increase in ꢀMT for 2 in the low-temperature region
is indicative of a weak ferromagnetic interaction between the two
Supporting Information Available: Preparation and physical
characterization data of the ligand and complexes 2 and 2ox,
electronic spectroscopic studies with oxidants and reductants, and
a CIF file for 2. This material is available free of charge via the
3
1
terminal HS CoII (S ) /2) ions and the central LS CoII (S ) /2)
ion (J ) J12 ) J12′ > 0) (inset of Figure 2b). On the contrary, there
is no sign of either ferro- or antiferromagnetic interaction between
References
the two terminal HS CoII (S ) /2) ions (J′ ) J22′ ) 0) across the
3
(1) Piguet, C.; Bernardinelli, G.; Hopfgartner, G. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 2005.
(2) (a) El-Ghayouy, A.; Harriman, A.; De Cian, A.; Fischer, J.; Ziessel, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9973. (b) Arom´ı, G.; Berzal, P. C.; Gamez, P.;
Roubeau, O.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Driessen, W. L.; Reedijk, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3444.
(3) Bera, J. K.; Dunbar, K. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4453.
(4) Cangussu, D.; Pardo, E.; Dul, M.-C.; Lescoue¨zec, R.; Herson, P.; Journaux,
Y.; Pedroso, E. F.; Pereira, C. L. M.; Mun˜oz, M. C.; Ruiz-Garc´ıa, R.; Cano,
J.; Amoro´s, P.; Julve, M.; Lloret, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4211.
(5) (a) Shultz, D. A.; Kumar, R. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6431. (b)
Shores, M. P.; Long, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3512.
(6) (a) Berry, J. F.; Cotton, F. A.; Daniels, L. M.; Murillo, C. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 3212. (b) Lin, S. Y.; Chen, I. W. P.; Chen, C. H.; Hsieh,
M. H.; Yeh, C. Y.; Lin, T. W.; Chen, Y. H.; Peng, S. M. J. Phys. Chem. B
2004, 108, 959.
central diamagnetic LS CoIII (S ) 0) ion for 2ox, as expected given
the large intramolecular metal-metal separation (∼14 Å). The
continuous decrease in ꢀMT in the high-temperature region for both
2 and 2ox is attributed to spin-orbit coupling effects of the orbitally
degenerate, terminal CoII ions (4T1) in a distorted octahedral
geometry.9
The magnetic susceptibility data for 2 and 2ox were analyzed
through the appropriate spin Hamiltonian for a linear trinuclear
3
1
model (eq 1 with S2 ) S2′ ) /2, L2 ) L2′ ) 1, and S1 ) /2 and 0
for 2 and 2ox, respectively):
(7) Ruiz, R.; Surville-Barland, C.; Aukauloo, A.; Anxolabe`here-Mallart, E.;
Journaux, Y.; Cano, J.; Mun˜oz, M. C. Dalton Trans. 1997, 745.
(8) Roux, C.; Adams, D. M.; Itie´, J. P.; Polian, A.; Hendrickson, D. N.;
Verdaguer, M. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 2846.
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
H ) -J(S1 · S2 + S1 · S2′) - J′(S2 · S2′) +
ˆ
2
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
Rλ(L2 · S2 + L2′ · S2′)
(9) Lloret, F.; Julve, M.; Cano, J.; Ruiz-Garc´ıa, R.; Pardo, E. Inorg. Chim. Acta
2008, 361, 3432.
2
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
+ ∆(L2z + L2′z ) + g1S1zꢁH + g2(S2z + S2′z)ꢁH +
ˆ
ˆ
R(L2z + L2′z)ꢁH
(1)
JA9052202
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 41, 2009 14615