Published on Web 09/28/2009
DOTA-M8: An Extremely Rigid, High-Affinity Lanthanide
Chelating Tag for PCS NMR Spectroscopy
Daniel Ha¨ussinger,*,† Jie-rong Huang,‡ and Stephan Grzesiek*,‡
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Basel, St. Johanns-Ring 19, 4056 Basel, Switzerland,
and DiVision of Structural Biology, Biozentrum, UniVersity of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50/70,
4056 Basel, Switzerland
Received April 22, 2009; E-mail: daniel.haeussinger@unibas.ch; stephan.grzesiek@unibas.ch
Abstract: A new lanthanide chelating tag (M8) for paramagnetic labeling of biomolecules is presented,
which is based on an eight-fold, stereoselectively methyl-substituted DOTA that can be covalently linked
to the host molecule by a single disulfide bond. The steric overcrowding of the DOTA scaffold leads to an
extremely rigid, kinetically and chemically inert lanthanide chelator. Its steric bulk restricts the motion of
the tag relative to the host molecule. These properties result in very large pseudocontact shifts (>5 ppm)
and residual dipolar couplings (>20 Hz) for Dy-M8 linked to ubiquitin, which are unprecedented for a small,
single-point-attachment tag. Such large pseudocontact shifts should be well detectable even for larger
proteins and distances beyond ∼50 Å. Due to its exceptionally high stability and lanthanide affinity M8 can
be used under extreme chemical or physical conditions, such as those applied for protein denaturation, or
when it is undesirable that buffer or protein react with excess lanthanide ions.
Introduction
site, the attachment has turned out to be quite a severe
stereochemical and physicochemical challenge, because lan-
Accurate determination of three-dimensional structures of
proteins in solution is one of the strongholds of modern NMR
spectroscopy. An even more demanding task is the precise
description of interaction sites and mechanisms in protein-protein
and protein-ligand complexes. All of these endeavors benefit
tremendously from recent developments in NMR techniques to
obtain long-range structural information. In addition to residual
dipolar couplings (RDCs), paramagnetic relaxation enhancement
(PRE) and pseudocontact shifts (PCS) caused by the interaction
of unpaired electrons in transition metal ions and nuclear spins
have recently attracted much attention.1-5
Due to their 1/r3 distance dependence, PCS yield particularly
valuable long-range distance and angular information. In many
cases, basic, very sensitive 2D-NMR experiments are sufficient
to extract precise PCS data, and as a consequence, PCS
determination is possible even for large biopolymers at the size
limit of current solution NMR techniques.5 To generate the PCS
effect, preferably lanthanide ions are attached to the protein,
since these transition metals have a particularly large magnetic
anisotropy. For the specialized case of metal-binding proteins,
this can easily be performed by exchanging the native metal
with lanthanide ions.6 In the absence of such a natural binding
thanides prefer a nine-fold coordination sphere, giving rise to
isomer formation.7-10 In addition, the metal ions need to be
positioned rigidly with respect to the protein; otherwise the PCS
is drastically reduced due to motional averaging. Several
lanthanide chelating tags (LCTs) based on EDTA,10-12 DTPA,7
and DOTA9,13 have been described that use convenient binding
to a single free cysteine on the surface of the protein. However,
thus far the observed PCS for these LCTs were much smaller
than for native metal-binding proteins, presumably due to the
motional freedom within the tag and/or of the tag relative to
the protein. Other approaches used zinc finger14 or EF hand15
domains fused to the protein of interest, which resulted in
similarly modest PCS and RDCs. More efficient tags have been
found in artificial lanthanide-binding peptides16-19 and in a rigid
(7) Prudencio, M.; Rohovec, J.; Peters, J. A.; Tocheva, E.; Boulanger,
M. J.; Murphy, M. E. P.; Hupkes, H. J.; Kosters, W.; Impagliazzo,
A.; Ubbink, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10, 3252–3260.
(8) Vlasie, M. D.; Comuzzi, C.; van den Nieuwendijk, A. M. C. H.;
Prudencio, M.; Overhand, M.; Ubbink, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13,
1715–1723.
(9) Keizers, P. H.; Desreux, J. F.; Overhand, M.; Ubbink, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 9292–3.
(10) Ikegami, T.; Verdier, L.; Sakhaii, P.; Grimme, S.; Pescatore, B.;
Saxena, K.; Fiebig, K. M.; Griesinger, C. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 29,
339–349.
† Department of Chemistry, University of Basel.
‡ Division of Structural Biology, Biozentrum, University of Basel.
(1) Bertini, I.; Luchinat, C. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biolo. 1999, 3, 145–151.
(2) Rodriguez-Castaneda, F.; Haberz, P.; Leonov, A.; Griesinger, C. Magn.
Reson. Chem. 2006, 44, S10–6, Spec No.
(11) Gaponenko, V.; Altieri, A. S.; Li, J.; Byrd, R. A. J. Biomol. NMR
2002, 24, 143–148.
(12) Gaponenko, V.; Sarma, S. P.; Altieri, A. S.; Horita, D. A.; Li, J.; Byrd,
R. A. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 28, 205–212.
(3) Mittag, T.; Forman-Kay, J. D. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007, 17, 3–
14.
(13) Ha¨ussinger, D. In Book of Abstracts; First European Conference on
Chemistry for Life Sciences, Rimini, Italy, October 4-8, 2005.
(14) Gaponenko, V.; Dvoretsky, A.; Walsby, C.; Hoffman, B. M.; Rosevear,
P. R. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 15217–24.
(4) Pintacuda, G.; John, M.; Su, X. C.; Otting, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007,
40, 206–212.
(5) Otting, G. J. Biomol. NMR 2008, 42, 1–9.
(15) Ma, C.; Opella, S. J. J. Magn. Reson. 2000, 146, 381–384.
(16) Wohnert, J.; Franz, K. J.; Nitz, M.; Imperiali, B.; Schwalbe, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13338–13339.
(6) Allegrozzi, M.; Bertini, I.; Janik, M. B. L.; Lee, Y. M.; Lin, G. H.;
Luchinat, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4154–4161.
9
10.1021/ja903233w CCC: $40.75 2009 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2009, 131, 14761–14767 14761