transesterification with lithium tert-butoxide.13 Following a
conventional three-step sequence, aziridine 14 was converted
to (S)-N-Boc-2-(hydroxymethyl) aziridine (16) in 82% overall
yield, which was then oxidized (DMP, CH2Cl2, rt) to furnish
the (S)-2-formyl-aziridine (9) in 80% yield.
Brønsted acids (HCl, HOTf, HBF4, etc.) or Lewis acids
(lanthanide triflates). Fortuitously, when the reaction was
performed in acetonitrile in the presence of a catalytic amount
of diphenylphosphoric acid [(PhO)2P(O)OH, 0.1 equiv], the
desired tetrahydroisoquinoline 20 was isolated in 27%
yield.18 Further optimization based on this observation by
varying the solvents (MeCN, PhMe, CH2Cl2), the temperature
(0 °C to rt), and the additives (molecular sieves, Na2SO4,
other acidic components) allowed us to identify the optimum
reaction conditions (cf. Supporting Information). Thus, slow
addition of a CH2Cl2 solution of 9 (1.2 equiv) to the mixture
of 8 (1.0 equiv), acetic acid (AcOH, 1.0 equiv), (PhO)2P(O)-
OH (0.1 equiv), and Na2SO4 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature
afforded 20 in 72% yield. It is interesting to note that using
acetic acid as a promoter in the absence of (PhO)2P(O)OH
under otherwise identical conditions 20 was produced in less
than 5% yield. Concurrent N- and O-benzylation of 20
furnished compound 21 in 81% yield.19 Copper bromide-
mediated coupling between Grignard reagent 22, generated
in situ from the corresponding aryl bromide, and aziridine
21 proceeded smoothly to afford compound 23 in 83% yield.
The N- and O-debenzylation and in situ N-methylation of
23 were realized under hydrogenolysis conditions [Pd(OH)2,
H2, HCHO, MeOH] to provide compound 24 in 82% yield.
The tandem N-Boc deprotection and Pictet-Spengler reac-
tion of 20 with benzyloxyacetaldehyde (25, CH2Cl2, TFA)
afforded bistetrahydroisoquinoline 26 in 64% yield.
Synthesis of bistetrahydroisoquinoline 26 is depicted in
Scheme 3. The commercially available 2,6-dimethoxytoluene
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Bistetrahydroisoquinoline 26
Syntheses of title natural products are detailed in Schemes
4 and 5. Conversion of tert-butyl ester in 26 to aldehyde
(LAH, then Swern oxidation) followed by the Strecker
reaction afforded pentacycle 27 (Scheme 3). The O-deben-
zylation of 27 was best realized in the presence of BCl3 to
afford alcohol 28 in 93% yield. Oxidation of phenol 28 with
DDQ afforded jorunnamycin A (29).20
Acylation of alcohol 29 with angelic acid under modified
Yamaguchi conditions21 provided (-)-renieramycin M (1).20
Similarly, acylation of alcohol 29 with acetic anhydride
afforded cyanojorumycin (30) that, upon treatment with silver
nitrate, was converted to (-)-jorumycin (3).20 On the other
hand, hydrolysis of the tert-butyl ester of 26 followed by
amide bond formation under carefully controlled conditions
(HATU, HOAt, DIPEA) afforded pentacycle 31 in 90% yield
(Scheme 4). Hydrogenolysis of 31 in the presence of
Pearlman’s catalyst afforded alcohol 32, which was converted
(17) was converted to aryl bromide 18 in four conventional
steps with 84% overall yield. Arylmagnesium formation from
18 under Knochel’s conditions14 followed by a copper
bromide-promoted coupling with aziridine 1115 afforded
aminoester 19 in 80% yield. Simultaneous O- and N-
deprotection of 19 under acidic conditions provided ami-
noester 8.16 The Pictet-Spengler reaction of 8 and 9 turned
out to be challenging. No reaction occurred under mild acidic
conditions (LiCl-HFIP, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methyl phenol),17
while degradation was observed in the presence of stronger
(18) Chiral phosphoric-acid-catalyzed enantioselective Pictet-Spengler
reactions of tryptamine derivatives and aldehydes, see: (a) Seayad, J.;
Seayad, A. M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1086–1087. (b)
Wanner, M. J.; van der Haas, R. N. S.; de Cuba, K. R.; van Maarseveen,
J. H.; Hiemstra, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7485–7487.
(19) The 1,3-cis stereochemistry of 17 was determined based on the
observed NOE correlation between H1 and H3. See Suppoting informa-
tion.
(13) Shtrumfs, B.; Chernyak, D.; Kalvins, I.; Trapencieris, P. Chem.
Heterocycl. Compd. 2004, 40, 725–733.
(14) Piller, F. M.; Metzger, A.; Schade, M. A.; Haag, B. A.; Gavryushin,
A.; Knochel, P. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 7192–7202.
(15) (a) Baldwin, J. E.; Farthing, C. N.; Russell, A. T.; Schofield, C. J.;
Spivey, A. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3761–3764. (b) Endo, A.; Kann,
T.; Fukuyama, T. Synlett 1999, 1103–1105. (c) Aziridines and Epoxides in
Organic Synthesis; Yudin, A. K., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006.
(16) For an alternative synthesis, see :Wu, Y.-C.; Bernadat, G.; Masson,
G.; Couturier, C.; Schlama, T.; Zhu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2046–
2052.
(20) The physical, spectroscopic, and spectrometric data of synthetic
materials are identical to those described for natural (-)-jorunnamycin A,
(-)-renieramycin M, (-)-jorumycin, and (-)-renieramycin G. See: (a)
Charupant, K.; Suwanborirux, K.; Amnuoypol, S.; Saito, E.; Kubo, A.; Saito,
N. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 81–86. (b) Fontana, A.; Cavaliere, P.;
Wahidulla, S.; Naik, C. G.; Cimino, G. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7305–7308.
(c) Davidson, B. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 3721–3724, and refs 1
and4a-c.
(17) (a) Chen, X. C.; Chen, J.-C.; De Paolis, M.; Zhu, J. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 4397–4408. (b) Willot, M.; Chen, J.-C.; Zhu, J. Synlett 2009,
577–580.
(21) Hartmann, B.; Kanazawa, A. M.; Depres, J.-P.; Greene, A. E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5077–5080.
5560
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 23, 2009