4′-Thioanalogues from Acyclic Precursors
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1. C4′-C1′ (red arrow) and C1′-C4′ (blue arrow)
Cyclization Pathways
Scheme 2. C4′-C1′ Cyclization*
ecules is also difficult as in D- or L- ꢀ-arabinosides or lyxosides
(see cis series, Figure 1). Obviously, the collision of the silylated
thymine nucleobase to the more hindered face of the glycosyl or
thioglycosyl donor is not favored because of steric factors, thus,
the higher energy of the transition states leading to these products.
From a conceptual standpoint, a kinetically controlled cy-
clization of an acyclic precursor already containing the nucleo-
base (i.e., formation of the furanose ring downstream from the
addition of the nucleobase) may be better suited to create these
sterically encumbered molecules than the bimolecular processes
currently used. We hypothesized that such cyclizations may
involve a stereogenic center (at C1′) bearing the nucleobase and
a thioether, which may serve as a leaving group or alternatively
as a nucleophile as illustrated in Scheme 1. In order to take
advantage of the stereochemistry of the thioaminal at C1′, both
types of cyclizations should involve “SN2-like” nucleophilic
displacements. Avoiding the formation of iminium ion12 (i.e.,
SN1-competing mechanism) will therefore be crucial to the
success of this strategy. The presence of an alkoxy at C2′ and
the chemoselective and soft activation of the thioethers at C1′
by thiophilic Lewis acids such as dimethyl(methylthio)sulfonium
tetrafluoroborate13 should disfavor such intermediates.
The first cyclization protocol will involve the intramolecular
displacement of the activated thioalkyl group of the thioaminal
at C1′ by the secondary hydroxyl group at C4′ (C4′-C1′
cyclization). This process would lead to the desired nucleosides
and analogues thereof with inversion of configuration at C1′,
as illustrated in Scheme 1. The acyclic 1,2-syn isomer would
give the C1′-C2′ trans nucleoside series, not withstanding the
stereochemistry of the substituent at C3′ and C4′. Similarly, the
anti thioaminals should lead to the C1′-C2′ cis nucleoside
series.
* Reagents and conditions: 1.2 equiv Me2S(SMe)BF4, THF, RT, (1-3 h).
of configuration at C1′ (C1′-C4′ cyclization); the 1,2-syn
isomers leading to the C1′-C2′ cis geometry and the 1,2-anti
isomers to the C1′-C2′ trans geometry. Both types of cycliza-
tions should be stereocontrolled and stereospecific, an exciting
strategy not previously exploited.
Our first cyclization strategy was tested on acyclic syn- or
anti-ethylthio- and benzylthio-N-thymidine thioaminals. A che-
moselective activation of the thioether moiety was achieved by
adding 1.1 equiv of dimethyl(methylthio)sulfonium tetrafluo-
roborate (Me2S(SMe)BF4) to a tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution
of the thioaminal at room temperature.16 As illustrated in
Scheme 2, in all cases the cyclization was diastereospecific, and
the final products were obtained in good to excellent yields.
An inversion of configuration had occurred at C1′ (products
9-16), suggesting that an “SN2-like” mechanism was operative.
Even highly sterically congested molecules (such as 12 and 14)
were efficiently synthesized, attesting to the potential of this
approach. The dependency of the C1′-C2′ relative stereochem-
istry of the final product to the C1′-C2′ relative stereochemistry
of the thioaminal is in sharp contrast to the pioneering work of
Liotta12 who used acyclic hemiaminals in his synthesis of AZT,
where strong Brønsted acids were employed and iminium ion
intermediates suggested since both C1′ epimers gave the same
product.
Alternatively, the sulfur of the thioaminal can serve as a
nucleophile when the C4′ hydroxyl is converted into a leaving
group,14 as illustrated in Scheme 1. The potential concomitant
loss of a benzyl halide15 from benzyl sulfonium would promote
such reactions. This would result in the transformation of the
thioaminals into 4′-thionucleosides in the L-series with retention
(9) (a) Li, N.-S.; Piccirilli, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4018. (b)
Vorbru¨ggen, H.; Krolikiewicz, K.; Bennua, B. Chem. Ber. 1981, 114,
1234.
(10) Larsen, C. H.; Ridgway, B. H.; Shaw, J. T.; Smith, D. M.; Woerpel,
K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10879.
(11) Howell, H. G.; Brodfuehrer, P. R.; Brundidge, S. P.; Benigni, D. A.;
Sapino, C. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 85.
Our second cyclization strategy was tested on mesyloxy
derivatives at C4′ as illustrated in Scheme 3. A solution of a
given diastereomerically pure thioaminal in presence of an
(12) Hager, M. W.; Liotta, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5117.
(13) Trost, B. M.; Murayama, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 63, 6529.
(14) Yokoyama, M. Synthesis 2000, 1637.
(15) (a) Le´pine, C.; Roy, C.; Delorme, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1843.
(b) Dyson, M. R.; Coe, P. L.; Walker, R. T. Carbohydr. Res. 1991,
216, 237.
(16) Guindon, Y.; Gagnon, M.; Thumin, I.; Chapdelaine, D.; Jung, G.;
Gue´rin, B. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 241.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 47, 2009 17243