Table 1. Absorption, Emission, and Electrochemical Properties
of the Dyes TC301 and TC306
c
λmax
(nm) in
emissionb Eox
λmax
(nm)
λmax
Eox - E0-0
(V vs
NHE)
f
(V vs (nm) on E0-0
d
dyes CH3CNa
NHE) TiO2
384d
(V)
2.82
2.68
2.44
2.34
-1.23
-1.09
-1.06
-0.96
TC301
TC306
374
429
527
553
1.59
392e
411d
425e
1.38
a Absorptions in dried CH3CN solutions (2 × 10-5 M) at rt. b Emission
spectra in dried CH3CN solutions (2 × 10-5 M) at rt. c The oxidation
potentials of the dyes were measured in dried DMF solutions with 0.1 M
tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) as electrolyte (working
electrode: glassy carbon; reference electrode: Ag/Ag+; calibrated with
ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) as an internal reference and converted to
NHE by addition of 630 mV.8 Counter electrode: Pt). d Absorptions of the
dyes loaded on TiO2 films immerged in dried CH3CN solutions. e Absorptions
of the dyes loaded on TiO2 films immerged in 0.8 M LiBr in dried CH3CN
solutions. f E0-0 were determined by onset wavelengths of the coresponding
absorption spetra on TiO2 films.
Figure 3. Photocurrent density vs voltage curves and IPCE action
spectra for dye-sensitized solar cells sensitized by the dyes TC301
(a, b) and TC306 (c, d) with different electrolytes: device A based
on 0.9 M DMBIBr, 0.08 M Br2, and 0.5 M TBP electrolyte in dried
CH3CN sloutions; device B based on 0.9 M DMBIBr, 0.8 M LiBr,
0.08 M Br2, and 0.5 M TBP electrolyte in dried CH3CN solutions;
device C based on 0.6 M DMPII, 0.06 M LiI, 0.04 M I2, and 0.4
M TBP electrolyte in dried CH3CN solutions.
M 1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide (DMPII), 0.06
M LiI, 0.04 M I2, and 0.4 M TBP in dried CH3CN solutions
produced a Voc of 0.696 V and a η value of 2.36% for the
dye TC301 and a Voc of 0.621 V and a η value of 4.10% for
the dye TC306. After replacement of I-/I3 with Br-/Br3
-
-
in TC301 dye-sensitized solar cells, device A yielded a
significant increasement in Voc (460 mV) but a decrease in
Jsc (0.42 mA cm-2). Device B yielded a significant increase-
ment in both Voc (345 mV) and Jsc (0.5 mA cm-2). Significant
A. For DSCs sensitized by the dye TC306, the IPCE value
for device C is broader than that for devices A and B. These
results are in agreement with absorption spectra of the dyes
attached to TiO2 with 0.8 M LiBr in CH3CN solutions and
photocurrent generation of the devices.
increases in Voc by using Br-/Br3 -based electrolytes instead
-
of I-/I3- were attributed to the enlarged energy level between
the redox potential of the electrolyte and the Fermi level of
TiO2. The Voc of device B is lower than that of device A;
this is probably due to the positive shift of the conduct band
edge of TiO2 in the presence of Li+ ions.9,10 The higher Jsc
in device B was attributed to the broad absorption of TC301
Table 2. Photovoltaic Performance of DSCs Based on the Dyes
TC301 and TC306 in Different Electrolytes As Shown in
Figure 3
on TiO2 in the presence of Li+ ions. Replacement of I-/I3
-
dye
Jsc (mA cm-2
)
Voc (V)
ff
η (%)
with Br-/Br3- in TC306 dye-sensitized solar cells, compared
to device C, yielded a large increase in Voc (about 300 mV)
for both device A and device B also due to the enlarged
energy level between the redox potential of the electrolyte
and the Fermi level of TiO2.
For DSCs sensitized by the dye TC301, the incident
photon-to-current conversion efficiencies (IPCEs) were be-
tween 75% and 80% around 400 nm and IPCE plateaus were
between 360 and 460 nm (Figure 3b). For DSCs sensitized
by the dye TC306, IPCEs were between 71% and 80%
around 450 nm, and IPCE plateaus were between 350 and
500 nm (Figure 3d). One can see from parts b and d of Figure
3 that devices A and B produced larger IPCE values below
400 nm compared to device C. This phenomenon is attribu-
tive to the lower absorption of bromine than that of iodine
in this spectral region. For DSCs sensitized by the dye
TC301, we found the IPCE value for device C is slightly
lower than that for device B and higher than that for device
device A
device B
device C
device A
device B
device C
4.00
4.93
4.42
7.12
7.36
8.76
1.156
1.041
0.696
0.939
0.915
0.621
0.796
0.713
0.767
0.781
0.752
0.754
3.68
3.66
2.36
5.22
5.07
4.10
TC301
TC306
Figure 4 shows the electrochemical impedance spec-
tra11-14 for devices A-C under forward bias (-0.7 V) in
the dark. The larger semicircles in the Nyquist plots are
attributed to the charge-transfer processes occurring at TiO2/
dye/electrolyte interface. Evidently, the charge-transfer re-
sistance at the interface was increased remarkably from
(11) Adachi, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Jiu, J.; Ogata, Y.; Isoda, S. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2006, 110 (28), 13872
(12) Wang, Q.; Moser, J.; Gra¨tzel, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109 (31),
.
14945
.
(13) Wang, Z.; Koumura, N.; Cui, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Sekiguchi, H.;
Mori, A.; Kubo, T.; Furube, A.; Hara, K. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20 (12),
3993
(14) Kuang, D.; Uchida, S.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Zakeeruddin, S.;
Gra¨tzel, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47 (10), 1923
(9) Redmond, G.; Fitzmaurice, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 1993, 97, 1426
.
.
(10) Lindstrom, H.; Sodergren, S.; Solbrand, A.; Rensmo, H.; Hjelm,
J.; Hagfeldt, A.; Lindquist, S.-E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 7717
.
.
5544
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 23, 2009