A.R. Salimi et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 937 (2009) 44–49
49
mation of dimmer complex and stabilization of this structure in
the real system. In order to investigate the stabilization effect of
intermolecular instead of intramolecular hydrogen bond, calcula-
tion of base paired dimmer ligands (L2.calc) also has been carried
out. Similarly, in the dimmer complex, the structure of ligands re-
tained without any change in conformation. The O1–H. . .N1 dis-
tance; angle in C2.calc and L2.calc are 1.837 Å; 169.58° and
1.873 Å; 172.90° respectively. The bond lengths of Sn–O and Sn–
Cl and bond angle of Cl–Sn–O in C2.calc structure are 2.620 Å,
2.496 Å and 178.00°, respectively. Overall, the agreement between
geometrical parameters of calculated C2.calc and experimental
structures is very good.
The strength of hydrogen bonds calculated based on the ener-
gies differences of the paired dimmer complexes and ligands,
C2.calc and L2.calc, with the requisite monomer complex and li-
gand, respectively. The cleavage of the dimeric complex, which
having same hydrogen bond pattern as in L2.calc, to monomeric
units costs 83.51 kJ/mol (corrected for the basis set superposition
error, BSSE). This exhibits a moderate strength hydrogen bond [1]
for the C2.calc with energy of 41.76 kJ/mol. The analogous hydro-
gen bonds in L2.calc proved to be slightly stronger (41.84 kJ/mol,
BSSE corrected) than dimmer complex (C2.calc). Comparison of di-
meric complex (C2.calc), which it is consistent with the crystal
structure, with the monomeric complex of C1.calc that contains
intramolecular hydrogen bonding shows that the half energy of
dimmer is greater than monomer complex (8.63 kJ/mol). These re-
sults probably can explain reason for chose of dimeric structure by
complex.
charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2
1EZ, UK (Fax: +44 1223 336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk
Acknowledgments
We thank Ferdowsi University of Mashhad and Shahid Behehsti
University for supporting this work.
References
[1] G.A. Jeffrey, An introduction to Hydrogen Bonding, Oxford University Press,
New York, 1997.
[2] S. Scheiner, Hydrogen Bonding. A Theoretical Perspective, Oxford University
Press, New York, 1997.
[3] M. Meyer, M. Brandl, J. Shnel, J. Phys. Chem. A 35 (2001) 8223.
[4] H.G. Korth, M.I. de Heer, P. Mulder, J. Phys. Chem. A 37 (2002) 8779.
[5] M. Gielen, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 16 (2002) 481.
[6] A.G. Davies, M. Gielen, K.H. Pannell, E.R.T. Tiekink (Eds.), Tin Chemistry:
Fundamental, Frontiers, and Application, John Wiley and Sons, New York,
2008.
[7] M. Gielen, E.R.T. Tiekink, in: M. Gielen, E.R.T. Tiekink (Eds.), Metallotherapeutic
Drugs and Metal-based Diagnostic Agents, Johan Willey and Sons, Chichester,
2005, p. 421.
[8] M.M. Amini, A. Azadmeher, H.R. Khavasi, S.W. Ng, J. Organomet. Chem. 692
(2007) 3922.
[9] M.M. Amini, A.L. Rheingold, R.W. Taylor, J.J. Zuckerman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106
(1984) 7289.
[10] J. Beckmann, K. Jurkschat, M. Schurmann, J. Organomet. Chem. 626 (2001)
49.
[11] M.M. Amini, A. Azadmeher, H.R. Bijanzadeh, N. Hadipour, J. Inclusion Phenom.
Macrocyclic Chem. 54 (2006) 77.
[12] Stoe and Cie, X-AREA, Version 1.30: Program for the Acquisition and Analysis
of Data, GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany, 2005.
4. Conclusion
[13] Stoe and Cie, X-AREA, Version 1.28: Program for Data Reduction and
Absorption Correction, GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany, 2005.
[14] Stoe and Cie, X-SHAPE, Version 2.05: Program for Crystal Optimization for
Numerical Absorption Correction, GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany, 2004.
[15] G.M. Sheldrick, SHELX97. Program for Crystal Structure Solution and
Refinement, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
[16] International Tables For X-ray Crystallography, vol. C, Kluwer Academic
Publisher, Doordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995.
[17] Stoe and Cie, X-STEP32, Version 1.07b: Crystallographic Package, GmbH,
Darmstadt, Germany, 2000.
[18] M.J. Frisch et al., Gaussian 98, Revision A.7, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
[19] P.J. Stephens, F.J. Devlin, C.F. Chabalowski, M.J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994)
11623.
[20] P.J. Smith, A.P. Tupeiauskas, Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 8 (1978) 291.
[21] T.P. Lockhart, W.F. Manders, Inorg. Chem. 25 (1986) 892.
[22] G.K. Sandhu, G. Kaur, J. Holecek, A. Lycka, J. Organomet. Chem. 365 (1989) 215.
[23] A.W. Addison, T.N. Rao, J. Reedjik, J. Van Rijn, G.C. Verschorr, J. Chem. Soc.
Dalton Trans. 1349 (1984).
In this study, a new adduct complex of triphenyltin(IV) chloride
and pyridine-2-ethanol has been prepared and characterized by
spectroscopic methods. DFT calculations of monomer complex
[Ph3SnCl(HOC7H9N)], dimmer complex, monomer free pyridine-
2-ethanol ligand, and dimeric form of ligands at the B3LYP/6-31G
(d, p) level have been carried out. Based on the theoretical results
we can conclude that intermolecular hydrogen bonding in the
crystal structure can play important role in the stabilization of title
compound as a dimeric complex. Theoretical results are in accor-
dance with the experimental data to good extent.
Supplementary material
[24] N.-G. Bokii, G.-N. Zakharova, Yu.T. Struchkov, J. Struct. Chem. 11 (1970) 828.
[25] D. Dakternieks, A. Duthie, D.R. Smyth, C.P.D. Stapleton, E.R. Tiekink, Organo-
metallics 22 (2003) 4599.
Crystallographic data for the structural analysis have been
deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC
No. 739025. Copy of this information may be obtained free of