Table 2 Asymmetric conjugate boration of cyclic enones with (R,S)-
Taniaphos (L7)
Conversion Yield
Substrate
Entry
1
(%)a
(%)b
ee (%)c
100
93 (70)d 98
Scheme 1 Catalytic b-boration of other cyclic carbonyl compounds.
reacted with the copper-L7 catalyst, produced the desired
product 2g with a modest level of enantioselectivity (entry 8).
The optimized reaction protocol was employed with
unsaturated lactone substrates (Scheme 1). Pentenolide 3
produced the boronate ester product in high yield and ee.
Also, initial studies on the formation of chiral tertiary C–B
centers were conducted with b-methylcyclohexenone.
Complete conversion of the starting enone was obtained only
with L3 or L4 among the ligands tested in Table 1.14 However,
the enantioselectivities achieved with these ligands were only
modest and are yet to be improved.
2
83
78
95
88
3e
1b
100
94 (75)
4
5
96
0
92 (72)
499
—
—
In summary, copper–boryl complexes coordinated with
the Taniaphos ligand is an efficient catalyst system for the
asymmetric conjugate boration of six- and seven-membered
unsaturated cyclic carbonyl compounds. Efficient enantio-
selective formation of secondary C–B bonds was achieved in
good yields and with excellent enantioselectivity. This method
also provides a new catalytic synthetic route to chiral cyclic
b-hydroxy ketones, which are difficult to access otherwise.
This work was supported by a Korea Science and Engineering
Foundation (KOSEF) grant funded by the Korea government
(MEST) (No. R01-2008-000-20332-0). We are grateful to
Solvias for a generous gift of (R,S)-Taniaphos.
dr = 43 : 57
96, 499
6
7
100
93 (79)
100
100
95
76
90
74
8
a
Conversion was determined on the basis of consumed starting
b
material by GC analysis with an internal standard. Isolated yield
c
of 2. Determined by chiral GC or HPLC analysis. See ESI for
d
Notes and references
details.w Yield in parentheses corresponds to that of b-hydroxy
ketone obtained via
(NaBO3 in THF–H2O). L1 was used instead of L7.
a sequential boration–oxidation reaction
1 For reviews, see: (a) I. Beletskaya and C. Moberg, Chem. Rev.,
2006, 106, 2320–2354; (b) G. J. Irvine, M. J. G. Lesley,
T. B. Marder, N. C. Norman, C. R. Rice, E. G. Robins,
W. R. Roper, G. R. Whittell and L. J. Wright, Chem. Rev.,
1998, 98, 2685–2722; (c) I. Beletskaya and C. Moberg, Chem.
Rev., 1999, 99, 3435–3461; (d) H. E. Burks and J. P. Morken,
Chem. Commun., 2007, 4717–4725.
2 (a) Y. G. Lawson, M. J. G. Lesley, T. B. Marder, N. C. Norman
and C. R. Rice, Chem. Commun., 1997, 2051–2052; (b) H. A. Ali,
I. Goldberg and M. Srebnik, Organometallics, 2001, 20,
3962–3965; (c) N. J. Bell, A. J. Cox, N. R. Cameron, J. S.
O. Evans, T. B. Marder, M. A. Duin, C. J. Elsevier,
X. Baucherel, A. A. D. Tulloch and R. P. Tooze, Chem. Commun.,
2004, 1854–1855.
e
Cyclohexenones having different substitution patterns were
generally good substrates, giving the corresponding borylated
products 2 with excellent enantioselectivities over 95% ee.13
However, the reaction of 1b, bearing two methyl groups at the
a0-position, had a slower rate of reaction, giving 83% conver-
sion with the Taniaphos ligand (entry 2). The copper-L1
complex was more catalytically active for the reaction of 1b
but the enantioselectivity obtained was slightly lower (88% ee;
entry 3). Cyclic enone 1d with two substituents at the g-
position showed no reactivity. This is probably due to too
much steric congestion near the reaction site and defines the
scope of the current catalytic system. Reaction of the benzyl-
substituted enone 1e afforded a diastereomeric mixture of
boronate products in a 1 : 1.3 ratio, with excellent ee values
of 96% and 499%, respectively (entry 6). The conjugate
boration of cycloheptenone also produced the desired product
in high yield and ee (entry 7). However, cyclopentenone, when
3 G. W. Kabalka, B. C. Das and S. Das, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43,
2323–2325.
4 (a) H. Ito, H. Yamanaka, J. Tateiwa and A. Hosomi, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2000, 41, 6821–6825; (b) K. Takahashi, T. Ishiyama and
N. Miyaura, Chem. Lett., 2000, 982–983; (c) K. Takahashi,
T. Ishiyama and N. Miyaura, J. Organomet. Chem., 2001, 625,
47–53; (d) S. Mun, J.-E. Lee and J. Yun, Org. Lett., 2006, 8,
4887–4889; (e) J.-E. Lee, J. Kwon and J. Yun, Chem. Commun.,
2008, 733–734; (f) H. Chea, H.-S. Sim and J. Yun, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2009, 351, 855–858; (g) M. Gao, S. B. Thorpe and
W. L. Santos, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 3478–3481.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
6578 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 6577–6579