Castilla et al.
JOCNote
similar process by treating the corresponding glycopyranosyl
azides with triphenylphosphine and then with carbon diox-
ide.11 In addition, bicyclic oxazolines and thiazolines (V, VI,
Figure 1b) can be prepared by cyclization of 1,2-trans-2-
deoxy-2-iodoglycopyranosyl derivatives12 and from 2-deoxy-
2-amidoglycosides.13
TABLE 1. Reaction of 1,2-Anhydroglucopyranose 1 with KSCN in the
Presence of Lewis Acids as Catalystsa
Herein, we show a general, short and efficient procedure
for synthesizing a new family of carbohydrate derivatives
with fused heterocycles of general formula VII (Figure 1c).
In the framework of developing new methodologies for the
synthesis of thiosugars, we explored the reaction of 1,2-
anhydrocarbohydrates with reagents typically used for
transforming epoxides into episulfides. Initially, the reaction
of 1,2-anhydro-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-R-D-glucopyranose14 (1)
with thiourea was tested but afforded a complex mixture of
products. When 1 was treated with KSCN (3 equiv) in dry
acetonitrile, the reaction also afforded a complex mixture
(Table 1, entry 1). Then, different Lewis acid catalysts were
entry
[cat.]
conversionb (%)
selectivityb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
100
100
100
40
100
100
mixture
mixture
40
95
95
BF3 OEt2
3
TMSOTf
Ti(OCH(CH3)2)4
TiCl4
TiO(CF3CO2)2
99
aConditions: 1 (1 mmol), KSCN (3 mmol), TiO(CF3CO2)2 (2% mol),
CH3CN (5 mL), reaction time (3 h), reflux. bConversion and selectivity
were determined by integration of H-1 protons in the reaction crude.
tested; however, when BF3 OEt2 was used (Table 1, entry 2)
oxathiolane cycle is fused cis with the carbohydrate. A
trans fusion would provide larger coupling constants
(∼9 Hz).5c,11a,b Vicinal coupling constants J2,3 (3.2 Hz) and
J3,4 (3.2 Hz) have unexpected small values, which suggests a
distorted pyranose ring with a preferential 0S2 pyranose
conformation, as previously reported for structurally related
bicyclic structures in solution.10,12a,13
A proposed mechanism for this transformation is shown
in Scheme 1. The reaction is presumably initiated by the
coordination of titanium catalyst to epoxide 1 with conco-
mitant opening of the epoxide by KSCN to give 3. Alter-
natively, the generation of oxocarbenium 4 could lead to the
formation of either 3 or 5. Since substituents at positions 1,2
in compound 3 have a cis relationship, compound 2 must
isomerize to 5 through cation 4. Further attack of the
alcoholate to the thiocyanate group in 5 would render the
final product. It has been reported that stoichiometric reac-
tions with organometallic reagents (Zr, Zn or Al) afforded
compounds of cis opening. Intermediates type 40, which have
been postulated in these cases, can not be discarded.17 There
are few examples of epoxides present in natural products
where their opening proceeds in a cis fashion.18
The reaction is compatible with other protecting groups
such as acetates. Thus, 1,2-anhydro-3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-R-D-
glucopyranose (6)14 was reacted following the optimized
conditions to afford 7 in 66% yield (Table 2, entry 1). The
reaction was then extended to other 1,2-anhydropyranoses,
such as the galacto derivative 8,14 which afforded compound
9 in excellent yield when it was treated with KSCN under the
optimized conditions (Table 2, entry 2). With the aim of
investigating the possibility of obtaining compounds with
opposite configuration at the 1,2-positions, the altro deriva-
tive 1019 was also treated with KSCN in the presence of
TiO(CF3COO)2 to afford the expected product 11 in 75%
yield (Table 2, entry 3).
3
the results did not improve. When the reaction was con-
ducted in the presence of trimetylsilyl triflate, no thiirane was
detected; instead, compound 2 was isolated in 40% yield
(Table 1, entry 3). The use of titanium catalysts, such as
titanium isopropoxide, afforded 2 with low conversion but
with almost complete selectivity (Table 1, entry 4). The
highest conversions and selectivities were obtained when
TiCl4 and TiO(CF3CO2)2 were used as catalysts (Table 1,
entries 5 and 6) and with TiO(CF3CO2)2 the yield was
quantitative.15 A strong oxophile catalyst is necessary in this
case in order to activate the epoxide without interacting with
the soft thiocyanate reagent.16
The structure of compound 2, incorporating a 1,3-ox-
athiolan-2-imine moiety, was determined by NMR and IR
spectroscopy, as well as by exact mass spectrometry. The
presence of the imidoyl group was determined by 13C NMR
(CdNH at roughly 189 ppm) and by the presence of two
strong signals at 1495 and 1453 cm-1 in the IR spectrum,
which are characteristic of the imidoyl functional group. The
presence of a broad singlet at 8 ppm in the 1H NMR
spectrum is assigned to an imine hydrogen, which completes
the characterization of this group. Furthermore, the 1H
NMR spectrum showed a doublet at 5.66 ppm (J1,2 = 6.4
Hz) that correlated with a carbon at 82.2 ppm (C-1), which
was assigned to an unshielded anomeric hydrogen. The
chemical shift for C-1 indicated that it is bonded to sulfur
and oxygen and not to two oxygens (δ ∼100 ppm). The
coupling constant J1,2 ∼6-7 Hz is characteristic for H-1 in
an equatorial position,5a,d,9e,10,11a,12a indicating that the
ꢀ
(11) (a) Kovacs, J.; Pinter, I.; Toth, G.; Gyorgydeak, Z.; Koll, P.
Carbohydr. Res. 1993, 239, 95–106. (b) Kovacs, J.; Pinter, I.; Messmer, A.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
€
ꢀ
€
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
Toth, G. Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 141, 57–65. (c) Ichikawa, Y.; Matsukawa, Y.;
Isobe, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3934–3938. (d) Ichikawa, Y.;
Matsukawa, Y.; Tamura, M.; Ohara, F.; Isobe, M.; Kotsuki, H. Chem.
ꢀ
ꢀ
Asian J. 2006, 1, 717–723. (e) Kovacs, J.; Pinter, I.; Messmer, A. Carbohydr.
Res. 1987, 166, 101–111.
ꢀ
(12) (a) Santoyo-Gonzalez, F.; Garcıa-Calvo-Flores, F.; Isac-Garcıa, J.;
Hernandez-Mateo, F.; Garcıa-Mendoza, P.; Robles-Dıaz, R. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 2877–2894. (b) De Castro, M.; Marzabadi, C. H. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 6501–6504.
(13) Nashed, M. A.; Slife, C. W.; Kiso, M.; Anderson, L. Carbohydr. Res.
1980, 82, 237–252.
(14) Cheshev, P.; Marra, A.; Dondoni, A. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341,
2714–2716.
(17) (a) Rainier, J. D.; Cox, J. M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2707–2709. (b) Wipf,
P.; Pierce, J. G.; Zhuang, N. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 483–485. (c) Xue, S.; Han,
K.-Z.; He, L.; Guo, Q.-X. Synlett 2003, 870–872.
(18) (a) Arif, J. M; Sawant, S. S.; El-Sayed, K. A.; Kunhi, M.; Subrama-
nian, M. P.; Siddiqui, Y. M.; Youssef, D. A.; Al-Hussain, K.; Al-Ahdal, M.
N; Al-Khodairy, F. J. Nat. Med. 2007, 61, 154–158. (b) El-Sayed, K. A.;
Laphookhiero, S.; Yousaf, M.; Prestrifge, J. A.; Shirode, A. B.; Wali, V. B.;
Sylvester, P. W. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 1117–1122.
ꢀ
(15) Sartori, P.; Weidenbruch, M. Angew. Chem. 1964, 76, 376–377.
(16) Iranpoor, N.; Zeynizadeh, B. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 3913–3918.
(19) Goo Soo, L.; Hye Kung, M.; Bong Young, C. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 543–544.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 2, 2010 515