246 Organometallics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2010
Del Grosso et al.
Table 2. Magnitude of Downfield Shift of the H3 Proton of
Crotonaldehyde on Binding to a Lewis Acid (in CD2Cl2 unless
otherwise stated)
Δδ of the H3 proton
of crotonaldehyde
Lewis acid
Me3Si(O3SCF3)
B(C6F5)3
AICI3
CatB[CbBr6]
BF2(O3SCF3)
BBr3
0.7d
1.05e
1.23a
1.28c
1.46b
1.49a
Figure 5. Superelectrophile-catalyzed production of aryl boro-
nic esters from CatBH.
process involving undesirable halogenated aromatics and
stoichiometric organolithium or organomagnesium re-
agents.31,70 Recent advances have improved the synthesis
of ArB(OR)2, particularly with the development of direct
arene borylation using iridium catalysts.71-75 A catalytic (in
Lewis acid) electrophilic borylation route to ArB(OR)2 from
Ar-H is attractive, with the potential to provide complemen-
tary selectivity patterns to iridium catalysts. Stoichiometric
(in cationic Lewis acid) arene borylation produces a strongly
a Ref 47. b Ref 65. c This work. d Ref 65, the lower than expected value
was attributed to the presence of a hypervalent five-coordinate silicon
center bonded to OTf. e Ref 66. The 1H NMR of [CatB(crotonal-
dehyde)][CbBr6] was recorded in C6D6.
anion cation interactions (e.g., [CH3CHCH3][1-H-CB11-
Me5Br6], anion, and carbocation Cþ---Br distance =
3 3 3
53
2.104(3) A). The combination of planarity at boron with
˚
the long anion cation distance indicates a very weak
3 3 3
Bronsted acidic byproduct, and these have been previously
e
interaction at most. The NMR and structural data combined
are more consistent with the phosphonium cation resonance
structure dominating in 3.36,67 The P1-O1 distance (1.595(4)
demonstrated to react with hydridic B-H bonds in neutral
boranes, liberating H2 and generating a formally cationic boron
electrophile.76,77 A combination of these two steps using CatBH
and a cationic initiator will enable catalytic electrophilic arene
borylation (Figure 5). The anion [CbBr6]- is essential for this
cycle, having a nucleophilicity comparable to toluene37,60,61,78
˚
A) is elongated compared to free OdPEt3 and to the Lewis
˚
acid/base adduct Et3PdOfB(C6F5)3 (P-O = 1.4973(17) A,
47
˚
B-O = 1.533(3) A), whileþphosphonium P-O distances
t
(e.g., [Ph2(Me)P-O-CH2 Bu] , P-O = 1.57 A)68 are closely
˚
and a conjugate Bronsted superacidity,37,55 essential for pro-
e
comparable to the P1-O1 distance observed in 3. The short
bond distance for O1-B1 (1.380(7) A) is also consistent with a
phosphonium cation formalism for 3 and comparable to the
tonation of the strong Bδþ-Hδ- bond in catecholborane. This
cycle requires only catalytic quantities of the cationic Lewis acid,
in sharp contrast to conventional EAS, which requires stoichio-
metric or excess Lewis acid reagents.1,3,4,79 This distinct behavior
is enabled by the inherent polarity of the Bδþ-Hδ- bond, which
reacts with superacidic “Hþ” species, in an entropically driven
process irreversibly producing H2 and regenerating the active
boron electrophile.
˚
˚
two B-Ocatecholato distances (1.374(2) and 1.372(2) A).
Initial attempts to probe the Lewis acidity of [CatB]þ by
formation of a crotonaldehyde adduct in CH2Cl2 were
unsuccessful, with numerous intractable products formed.
This was consistent with a cationic electrophile reacting with
chlorinated solvent18,69 and distinct to neutral Lewis acid-
crotonaldehyde complexes that are stable at 25 °C in
CH2Cl2. [CatB(crotonaldehyde)][CbBr6] was synthesized in
arene solvents and had an 11B NMR resonance at 23.8 ppm,
Twenty equivalents of CatBH (with respect to starting
[Ph3C][CbBr6]) was added to the reaction mixture resulting
from the stoichiometric combination of [Et3Si][CbBr6] and
CatBX in benzene (Scheme 1). No reaction was observed at
25 °C, but heating to reflux resulted in the complete conver-
sion of all CatBH to CatB-Ph through the catalytic (in
superacid) intermolecular electrophilic borylation. The ob-
1
consistent with a three-coordinate boron species. The H
NMR spectrum (in C6D6) confirmed the deshielding of the
H3 resonance, which is shifted 1.28 ppm downfield relative
to free crotonaldehyde (in C6D6 at 25 °C). This shift is less
than reported for the Br3B-crotonaldehyde adduct, albeit
recorded in CD2Cl2 (Table 2). The discrepancy between the
two Lewis acidity scales can be attributed to a greater
hard-soft mismatch between the hard Lewis acidic boron
center in [CatB]þ and the predominantly covalent double-
bond character of the pπ-pπ double bond of the CdO group
in crotonaldehyde. The reversal of relative Lewis acidities in
the Et3PdO adducts is due to the more ionic OdP pπ-dπ
bond, as noted previously66 and consistent with calculations
on borenium cations.15
1
servation of H2 (and HD when performed in C6D6, by H
NMR) and the absence of catalysis when the hindered base
2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine is added to sequester Hþ is consis-
tent with the protonation of CatBH by a Bronsted acidic
e
species during the catalytic cycle.36 Catalytic electro-
philic borylation of alkyl-substituted arenes with CatBH
(70) Constable, D. J. C.; Dunn, P. J.; Hayler, J. D.; Humphrey, G. R.;
Leazer, J. L.; Linderman, R. J.; Lorenz, K.; Manley, J.; Pearlman, B. A.;
Wells, A.; Zaks, A.; Zhang, T. Y. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 411.
(71) Mkhalid, I. A. I.; Coventry, D. N.; Albesa-Jove, D.; Batsanov,
A. S.; Howard, J. A. K.; Perutz, R. N.; Marder, T. B. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 45, 489.
(72) Murphy, J. M.; Lao, X.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 15434.
(73) Cho, J.-Y.; Tse, M. K.; Holmes, D.; Maleczka, R. E.; Smith,
Catalysis. Aryl boronic esters (ArB(OR)2) are important
synthetic intermediates widely utilized in metal-catalyzed
C-C bond-forming reactions.31-33 Their production from
arenes classically proceeds in an atom-inefficient, multistep
M. R., III Science 2002, 295, 305.
(74) Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 680, 3.
(75) Miyaura, N. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2008, 81, 1535.
(76) Olah, G. A.; Aniszfeld, R.; Prakash, G. K. S.; Williams, R. E.;
Lammertsma, K.; Guner, O. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7885.
(77) Shapland, P.; Vedejs, E. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4094.
(78) Moxham, G. L.; Douglas, T. M.; Brayshaw, S. K.; Kociok-
Kohn, G.; Lowe, J. P.; Weller, A. S. Dalton Trans. 2006, 5492.
(79) Olah, G. A.; Molnar, A. Hydrocarbon Chemistry; Wiley
Interscience: NJ, 2003.
(66) Britovsek, G. J. P.; Ugolotti, J.; White, A. J. P. Organometallics
2005, 24, 1685.
(67) Dureen, M. A.; Lough, A.; Gilbert, T. M.; Stephan, D. W. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 4303.
(68) Henrick, K.; Hudson, H. R.; Kow, A. Chem. Commun. 1980,
226.
(69) Gunnoe, T. B.; Caldarelli, J. L.; White, P. S.; Templeton, J. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2093.