Scheme 5
.
Cycloaddition
Table 1. Cycloaddition Conditions
entry
conditions
reaction timea (h)
temp
solvent
dr (2a:2b:2c) yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
16 (2 equiv) and 3, add Et3N (2 equiv) over 15 min
7
7
5
3
5
2
2
2
5
7
-78 °C CH2Cl2
-78 °C CH2Cl2
-78 °C CH2Cl2
-78 °C CH2Cl2
-45 °C CH2Cl2
-45 °C CH2Cl2
-45 °C CH2Cl2
-45 °C toluene
-45 °C CH2Cl2
-45 °C CH2Cl2
1.9:1:0
2.3:1:0
2.1:1:0
1.5:1:0
2:1:1.2
3:1.5:1
2.1:1:1
2.5:1:1
3:1:0
23
27
25
12
49
48
53
35
17
22
16 (2 equiv) and 3, add Et3N (2 equiv) over 2 h
3 and Et3N (2 equiv), add 16 (2 equiv) over 2 h
3 and Et3N (2 equiv), add 16 (2 equiv) over 4 h
3 and Et3N (2 equiv), add 16 (2 equiv) over 10 min
16 (2 equiv) and 3, add Et3N (2 equiv) over 3 h
16 (3 equiv) and 3, add Et3N (3 equiv) over 3 h
16 (3 equiv) and 3, add Et3N (3 equiv) over 3 h
16 (2 equiv) and 3, add (Bu3Sn)2O (1 equiv) over 5 min
16 (3 equiv) and 3, add (Bu3Sn)2O (1.5 equiv) over 2 h
10
2.5:1:1.5
a After addition of final reactant described in ‘conditions’.
moiety of the rubromycins.16 However, treatment of a
solution of nitroalkane17 7 and alkene 3 with phenyl
isocyanate and catalytic quantities of triethylamine disap-
pointingly effected isomerization of the alkene 3 and rapid
homodimerization of the nitrile oxide to the novel oxadiazole
N-oxide 14. Inverse addition of the base and varying the
equivalents of the reagents had no effect on the outcome of
this reaction (Scheme 4).
From these preliminary studies it became clear that there
were two problemssthe nitrile oxide 4 was undergoing facile
homodimerization at room temperature and the alkene 3 was
undergoing rapid isomerization, even in the presence of
catalytic quantities of base. It was therefore decided to generate
the nitrile oxide 4 by dehydrohalogenation of a hydroxyiminoyl
halide,18 a transformation that can be conducted at lower
temperatures hopefully suppressing homodimerization as well
as the undesired isomerization of alkene 3.
relatively unstable iminoyl chloride 16 after a short silica
gel column.20 Addition of freshly prepared alkene 3 and
triethylamine to 16 at -78 °C gratifyingly afforded a mixture
of two separable diastereomeric adducts 2a and 2b, albeit
in poor yield (Entry 1, Table 1).
It was assumed that the cycloadducts 2a and 2b predomi-
nantly adopt a conformation wherein the C10-O bond of the
isoxazoline ring is antiperiplanar to the carbonyl group of
the pyrrolidine ring thereby minimizing unfavorable dipole-
dipole interactions. A strong NOE correlation between the
H10 and H11 in cycloadduct 2b clearly established the
H10-H11 syn stereochemistry whereas the absence of a
similar NOE correlation in cycloadduct 2a established the
H10-H11 anti stereochemistry in this case. The difference
(14) For similar isomerisations, see: (a) Zlatopolskiy, B. D.; Kroll, H.-
P.; Melotto, E.; de Meijere, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 4492. (b)
Yamauchi, C.; Kuriyama, M.; Shimazawa, R.; Morimoto, T.; Kakiuchi, K.;
Shirai, R. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3133.
Thus, the revised cycloaddition was conducted as follows
(Scheme 5). Treatment of oxime 1519 with N-chlorosuccin-
imide and a catalytic quantity of pyridine afforded the
(15) Mukaiyama, T.; Hoshino, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 5339.
(16) (a) Waters, S. P.; Fennie, M. W.; Kozlowski, M. C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 5409. (b) Waters, S. P.; Fennie, M. W.; Kozlowski, M. C.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3243.
(17) Sinhababu, A. K.; Boschardt, R. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24,
227.
(13) (a) Battersby, A. R.; Westwood, S. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1987, 1679. (b) Tamura, N.; Matsushita, Y.; Iwama, T.; Harada, S.;
Kishimoto, S.; Itoh, K. Chem. Pharm Bull. 1991, 39, 1199. (c) Katoh, T.;
Nagata, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Arai, K.; Minami, J.; Terashima, S. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 6221.
(18) Kozikowski, A. P.; Adamczyk, M. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 366.
(19) Kabalka, J. W.; Gaudgaon, N. M. Synth. Commun. 1988, 18, 693.
(20) Quadrelli, P.; Mella, M.; Ivernizzi, A. G.; Caramella, P. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 10497.
422
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 3, 2010