Article
d. Synthesis of [CpFe(CO)2{P(H)(SiHPh2)N-i-Pr2}][AlCl4]
Organometallics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2010 489
Table 3. Crystal Data and Structure Refinement for 4 and 6
(4). The compound [CpFe(CO)2(P(Cl)N-i-Pr2)] (50 mg, 0.146
mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL), and H2SiPh2 (54.2 μL,
0.292 mmol) was then added. The resulting solution was added
to AlCl3 (29.2 mg, 0.219 mmol) and stirred for 30 min. Pentane
(5 mL) was added slowly with mixing, and the resulting cloudy
solution was cooled at -30 °C for 4 days, resulting in the
formation of a dark orange oil. The supernatant was decanted,
and the oil was triterated with pentane (3 ꢀ 1 mL), resulting in
the formation of a semicrystalline oily solid, which was dried
under vacuum. Yield: 66 mg, 68%. IR (CH2Cl2 solution, cm-1):
νPH=2251, νSiH=2146, νCO=2064, 2021. 1H NMR: δ 7.62
(dd, 1H, 1J(HP)=350 Hz, 3J(HH)=6 Hz, PH), 7.3-7.9 (m, Ph),
5.53 (dd, 1H, 2J(PH)=28 Hz, 3J(HH)=6 Hz, SiH), 3.2 (d sept,
2H, 3J(HH) = 7 Hz, 3J(HP) = 16 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.19 (d,
4
6
empirical
formula
fw
temperature (K)
˚
wavelength (A)
C
25H31AlCl4-
FeNO2PSi
C
19H25AlCl4-
Fe2NO3P
661.20
173(2)
626.85
173(2)
0.71073
orthorhombic
Pna21
0.71073
monoclinic
P21
cryst syst
space group
unit cell dimens
˚
a (A)
24.434(3)
10.191(1)
12.795(1)
10.321(2)
12.557(2)
10.334(2)
98.259(2)
1325.5(4)
2
˚
b (A)
˚
c (A)
β (deg)
volume (A )
3
˚
3186.0(6)
4
1.378
3
3J(HH)=7 Hz, CH3), 0.91 (d, J(HH)=7 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H}
Z
density (calcd) (Mg/m3)
1.571
1.612
636
NMR: δ 15.9 (s w satellites, 1J(SiP)=36 Hz). 29Si{1H} NMR: δ
-9.8 (d, 1J(SiP)=36 Hz). MS (electrospray, CH2Cl2 solution):
m/z=492 (Mþ), 310 (M - SiPh2)þ, 308 ([M - H2SiPh2]þ).
e. Synthesis of [CpFe(CO)2{P(H)(SiEt3)N-i-Pr2}] (5). The
compound [CpFe(CO)2(P(Cl)N-i-Pr2)] (50 mg, 0.146 mmol)
was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL), and HSiEt3 (46.6 μL, 0.292
mmol) was then added. The resulting solution was added to
AlCl3 (23.4 mg, 0.175 mmol) and mixed well. Pentane (5 mL)
was added slowly, and the resulting solution was kept at -30 °C
for 4 days, resulting in the formation of an orange precipitate.
The supernatant was decanted, and the solid was washed with
pentane and then dried under vacuum. Yield: 60 mg, 69%. IR
absorp coeff (mm-1
F(000)
)
0.947
1360
cryst size (mm3)
θ range (deg)
index ranges
0.37 ꢀ 0.36 ꢀ 0.19
1.67 to 27.48
-31 e h e 31
-13 e k e 13
-16 e l e 16
25 971
7253 [R(int) =
0.0317]
100.0%
0.53 ꢀ 0.26 ꢀ 0.26
1.62 to 27.48
-13 e h e 13
-16 e k e 16
-13 e l e 13
11 453
5979 [R(int) =
0.0160]
99.3%
reflns collected
indep reflns
completeness
to θ = 27.48°
max. and min transmn
data/restraints/params
goodness-of-fit on F2
final R indices
[I > 2σ(I)]
0.8406 and 0.7208
7253/1/333
1.094
0.6793 and 0.4821
5979/1/287
1.067
1
(CH2Cl2 solution, cm-1): νPH=2223, νCO=2062, 2019. H
NMR: δ 7.26 (d, 1H, PH, 1J(HP)=340 Hz), 5.35 (s, 5H, C5H5),
3.21 (d sept, 2H, CH(CH3)2, 3J(HH)=6.6 Hz, 3J(HP)=15 Hz),
1.22 (d, 6H, CH(CH3)2, J(HH) = 6.6 Hz), 1.21 (d, 6H, CH-
3
(CH3)2, 3J(HH)=6.6 Hz), 1.16 (t, 9H, SiCH2CH3, 3J(HH)=7.5
Hz), 0.58 (q, 6H, SiCH2, 3J(HH) = 7.5). 31P{1H} NMR:
R1
wR2
0.0330
0.0722
0.0236
0.0585
R indices (all data)
R1
wR2
1
δ 9.9 (s w satellites, J(SiP)=20 Hz). 29Si{1H} NMR: δ 24.1
0.0392
0.0750
0.0240
0.0589
(d, 1J(SiP)=20 Hz). MS (electrospray, CH2Cl2 solution): m/z=
424 (Mþ), 310 ([M - SiEt3 þ H]þ).
absolute struct param
largest diff peak
-0.01(1)
0.422 and -0.214
f. Synthesis of [{CpFe(CO)}2(μ-CO){μ-P(H)N-i-Pr2}][AlCl4]
(6). A solution of [CpFe(CO)2{P(H)(SiEt3)(N-i-Pr2)][AlCl4] in 2
mL of CH2Cl2 was prepared from [CpFe(CO)2(P(Cl)N-i-Pr2)]
(50 mg, 0.146 mmol) as described above. Phenol (8.1 mg, 0.146
mmol) was added, and the resulting solution was stirred for 15
min. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and the residue
was extracted into 1 mL of CH2Cl2. Pentane (5 mL) was slowly
added with stirring, and the resulting slightly cloudy solution
was cooled to -30 °C for 15 h, resulting in the formation of a
dark red precipitate. The supernatant was decanted, and the
precipitate was washed with 3 ꢀ 5 mL of pentane, dried under
vacuum, and then re-extracted into CH2Cl2 (0.3 mL). Pentane
(3 mL) was added, and resulting solution was again cooled to
-30 °C for 15 h, resulting in the formation of dark red crystals,
which were collected and dried under vacuum. Yield: 26 mg,
57%. IR (cast, cm-1): νCO=2045, 2037, 2002, 1950, 1823. 1H
NMR: δ 7.15 (dd, 1H, 1J(HP)=402 Hz, PH), 5.45 (m, 5H, Cp),
3.7 (bm, 1H, NCH(CH)3), 3.4 (m, 1H, NCH(CH)3), 1.54 (d, 6H,
0.485 and -0.374
3
and hole (e A )
˚
the Fe atom and 6-31G(d) for all others.25 Transition state
structures were located using opt=ts or opt=ts,ef (i.e., no
synchronous transit) algorithms. Each optimized transition
state structure was subjected to a vibrational frequency analysis,
to ensure that the structure was indeed a transition state: there
should be 1 imaginary frequency only, and the magnitudes of all
frequencies should be greater than the residual noise (the six
“zero frequencies” for translations and rotations from normal
mode diagonalization). The appropriateness of each located
transition state and the single-step nature of the reactions were
verified by “plus-and-minus-displacement” minimization runs:
˚
the transition state is displaced ∼0.05 A or 5° along the imagin-
ary-frequency normal mode in both directions, and the two
displaced structures are optimized toward the nearest minimum-
energy structures. Gibbs energies (298.15 K) were computed using
the rigid-rotor/harmonic-oscillator assumptions. Partial charges
are according to a Mulliken population analysis.
3
3J(HH)=6.3 Hz, CH3), 1.25 (d, 6H, J(HH)=6.6 Hz, CH3).
31P{1H} NMR: δ 12.7. MS (electrospray, CH2Cl2 solution):
m/z = 458 (Mþ), 419, 402. GC-MS. A solution of [CpFe-
(CO)2{P(H)(SiEt3)N-i-Pr2}] (5) (0.058 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(2 mL) was prepared as described above. Phenol (5.5 mg,
0.058 mmol) was added, and the resulting solution was stirred
for 15 min. A 5 μL aliquot was withdrawn from the solution
and injected into the GC-MS. The only significant volatile
component observed was PhOSiEt3 (retention time=12.5 min,
m/z=208 (Mþ), 179 ([M - Et]þ), 151 ([M - Et - H2CdCH2]þ,
123 ([M - Et - 2 H2CdCH2]þ), 77 (Phþ).
h. X-ray Crystallography. Suitable crystals of compounds 4
and 6 were mounted on glass fibers. Programs for diffract-
ometer operation, data collection, cell indexing, data reduc-
tion, and absorption correction were those supplied by Bruker
AXS Inc., Madison, WI. Diffraction measurements were made
on a PLATFORM diffractometer/SMART 1000 CCD using
graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation at -100 °C. The
unit cell was determined from randomly selected reflections
obtained using the SMART CCD automatic search, center,
index, and least-squares routines. Integration was carried out
using the program SAINT, and an absorption correction
was performed using SADABS. Crystal data and collection
g. Computational Chemistry. All calculations were performed
using the Gaussian 03 software package, revisions C.02 and
E.01.25 The level of approximation was the density-functional
theory B3LYP,26 and the orbital basis sets were LANL2DZ for