Water Wires in Hydrophobic Peptide Channels
A R T I C L E S
Figure 10. Experimentally observed single-file water inside the human aquaporin AQP4 (ref 11e, drawn using the cooordinate set PDB ID 3GD8 from the
Protein Databank23 using PyMol24). Shown in sticks are the residues forming the amphipathic faces of the water channel. The hydrogen-bonding distances
between the water oxygens in the water wire and with the residues of the hydrophilic face are shown as dashed lines (distances given in Å). The distances
of the water oxygens closest to the hydrophobic face of the channel are indicated as dotted lines.
spanning the membrane. Molecular dynamics studies of the M2
transmembrane domain provide evidence for water penetration
deep into the transmembrane helix regions.18 The infiltration
of water molecules into the membrane channel specific for alkali
cations has also been established in recent structural work on
the NaK channel from Bacillus cereus.19
molecules aligned along the long axis of the tube. The absence
of strong interactions with the walls of the tube in the case of
peptide nanotubes would permit rapid rotation of water mol-
ecules about the axis of the tube. Such a motion must contribute
to rotational entropy, which in turn may be a factor resulting in
a lower overall free energy for the encapsulated water wire.20
Rotational motion in a direction perpendicular to the tube axis
should permit interchange of donor/acceptor interactions in a
concerted fashion, providing a mechanism for Grotthuss-type
proton transport, which has been favored as a mechanism for
proton conduction in ordered water arrays.12,14,20,21 In contrast,
the architecture of the aquaporin water channels anchors the
second O-H bond of the water molecule in a strong hydrogen
bond interaction with the polar side chains which line the
channel.11e Water hops between hydrogen-bonding sites may
then be a mechanism for the single-file transport through the
protein pores. The two crystal forms of peptide 2 (2a and 2b)
characterized earlier provided an example of both short hydrogen
bond (dO· · ·O ) 2.6 Å) and long hydrogen bond (dO· · ·O ) 3.5
Å) arrangements of the water wires. The latter was obtained by
the transformation of the originally formed crystals. Peptide 2
and its enantiomorph 6 present examples of multiple crystal
forms, and different packing arrangements could be obtained.
The structure of peptide 6a reveals a porous lattice with water
Conclusions
The water wires considered above consist of a one-
dimensional assembly of water molecules which participate as
a donor/acceptor in hydrogen bond interactions with preceding
and succeeding water molecules. Two classes of O · · · O
distances have been observed: 2.6-2.9 Å in the case of peptide
2a, the dipeptide Val-Ile,4c and the human aquaporin AQP411e
and 3.2-3.5 Å in the case of peptides 2b, 6a, and cyclic peptide
nanotubes reported by Ghadiri and co-workers.3c In the case of
hydrophobic tubes, the second hydrogen atom points toward
the walls of the tube, but in all cases discussed above, except
the aquaporins, there does not appear to be any strong interaction
involving this O-H bond. Tubular peptide channels considered
above have diameters in the range 5.2-7.7 Å, with the water
(15) (a) Blanton, W. B. B.; Gordon-Wylie, S. W.; Clark, G. R.; Jordan,
K. D.; Wood, J. T.; Geiser, U.; Collins, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 3551–3552. (b) Barbour, L. J.; Orr, G. W.; Atwood, J. L. Chem.
Commun. 2000, 859–860. (c) Custelcean, R.; Afloroaei, C.; Vlassa,
M.; Polverejan, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3094–3096. (d)
Moorthy, J. N.; Natarajan, R.; Venugopalan, P. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 3417–3420. (e) Doedens, R. J.; Yohannes, E.; Khan,
M. I. Chem. Commun. 2002, 62–63. (f) Pal, S.; Sankaran, N. B.;
Samanta, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1741–1743. (g) Ghosh,
S. K.; Bharadwaj, P. K. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 8250–8254. (h) Ma,
B.; Sun, H.; Gao, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1374–1376.
Byl, O.; Liu, J.-C.; Wang, Y.; Yim, W. L.; Johnson, J. K.; Yates,
J. T., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12090–12097. Mascal, M.;
Infantes, L.; Chisholm, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 32–36.
(16) Stoyanov, E. S.; Stoyanova, I. V.; Tham, F. S.; Reed, C. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 17540–15441.
(20) (a) Pomes, R.; Roux, B. Biophys. J. 1996, 71, 19–39. (b) Hummer,
G.; Rasaiah, J. C.; Noworyta, J. P. Nature 2001, 414, 188–190. (c)
Berezhkovskii, A.; Hummer, G. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2002, 89064503.
(21) (a) Agmon, N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 244, 456–462. (b) Pomes, R.;
Roux, B. Biophys. J. 2002, 82, 2304–2316. (c) Tajkhorshid, E.; Nollert,
P.; Jensen, M. A.; Miercke, L. J. W.; O’Connell, J.; Stroud, R. M.;
Schulten, K. Science 2002, 296, 525–530. (d) Burykin, A.; Warshel,
A. Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 3696–3706. (e) Chakrabarti, N.; Tajkhorshid,
E.; Roux, B.; Pomes, R. Structure 2004, 12, 65–74. (f) Dellago, C.;
Hummer, G. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2006, 97, 245901. (g) Takhashi, R.;
Wang, H.; Lewis, J. P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 9093–9098. (h)
Alexiadis, A.; Kassinos, S. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 5014–5034. (i)
Kofinger, J.; Hummer, G.; Dellago, C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2008, 105, 13218–13222. (j) Parthasarathi, R.; Elango, M.; Subrama-
nian, V.; Sathyamurthy, N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 3744–3749.
(22) Allen, F. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C 2002, 58, 380–388.
(23) Bernstein, F. C.; Koetzle, T. F.; Williams, G. J.; Meyer, E. E., Jr.;
Brice, M. D.; Rodgers, J. R.; Kennard, O.; Shimanouchi, T.; Tasumi,
M. J. Mol. Biol. 1977, 112, 535.
(17) Stoufer, A. L.; Acharya, R.; Salom, D.; Levine, A. S.; Costanzo, D. L.;
Soto, C. S.; Tereshko, V.; Nanda, V.; Stayrook, S.; DeGrado, W. F.
Nature 2008, 451, 596–600.
(18) (a) Yi, M.; Cross, T. A.; Zhou, H. X. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2009, 106, 13311–13316. (b) Khurana, E.; Peraro, M. D.; DeVane,
R.; Vemparala, S.; DeGrado, W. F.; Klein, M. L. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 1069–1074.
(19) (a) Alam, A.; Jiang, Y. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 30–34. (b)
Alam, A.; Jiang, Y. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 35–41.
(24) DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System; DeLano
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 3, 2010 1085