98
J. Pérard-Viret et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 96–98
Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 2817–2824; (c) Halie, D.; Pérard-Viret, J.; Dufour, S.;
Table 2
Royer, J. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1402–1414.
Condensation of imine 5 with anhydride 9
2. (a) Ahmad, V. U.; Rahman, A.; Rasheed, T.; Rehman, H. Heterocycles 1987, 26,
1251–1255; (b) Rasheed, T.; Khan, M. N. I.; Zhadi, S. S. A.; Durrani, S. J. J. Nat.
Prod. 1991, 54, 582–584.
Entry
Solvent
Experimentala
conditions
10 yield (%)
Diastereomeric ratiob
a (syn)/b (anti) (%)
3. Badole, S.; Patel, N.; Bodhankar, S.; Jain, B.; Bhardwaj, S. Indian J. Pharmacol.
2006, 38, 49–53.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CH3CN
Toluene
THF
CHCl3
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
45 min, 150 °C
45 min, 150 °C
45 min, 150 °C
45 min, 150 °C
90 min, 150 °C
90 min, 160 °C
45 min, 180 °C
78
62
84
62
84
76
48
43/57
25/75
20/80
36/64
62/38
83/17
95/5
4. (a) Padwa, A.; Danca, M. D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 715–717; (b) Padwa, A.; Danca, M.
D.; Hardcastle, K. I.; McClure, M. S. J .Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 929–941.
5. (a) Simpkins, N. S.; Gill, C. D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 535–537; (b) Gill, C. D.;
Greenhalgh, D. A.; Simpkins, N. S. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9213–9230.
6. Preliminary Communication at the XIIth ICSN Symposium: ‘From Organic
Chemistry to Chemical Biology’, July 11–12th, 2009. Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
7. Tang, Y.; Fettinger, J. C.; Shaw, J. T. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3802–3805.
8. Stibor, I.; Srogl, J.; Janda, M.; Piricova, N.; Vlazny, K. Collect. Czech. Chem.
Commun. 1982, 47, 3261–3267.
a
All the reactions were performed under microwave activation.
Estimated by NMR.
b
9. To 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethylamine–HCl (2.17 g, 10 mmol) and citric
acid (3.84 g, 20 mmol) in H2O (80 mL) was added
2 (2.0 g, 10 mmol) in
CCl4 (35 mL). The solution was vigorously stirred under reflux for 8 h. The
organic layer was washed with satd NaHCO3 soln, dried with MgSO4,
concentrated in vacuo and the residue was purified by flash column
time and temperature, it appeared that when acetonitrile or tetra-
hydrofuran was employed, highest yields were observed, but vary-
ing diastereomeric ratios were found. With THF (Table 2, entry 3), a
clean and high yielding reaction was observed but unfortunately
the anti diastereoisomer 10b was the major isomer.
In order to reverse the diastereomeric ratio, we focussed on the
reaction in acetonitrile and changed the irradiation time and the
temperature (Table 2, entries 1, 5–7)). It was then found that a
longer reaction time led predominantly to 10a. In the same way,
a slight increase in the temperature (Table 2, entry 6) led to a
76% yield and a good 83:17 ratio in favour of the syn diastereomer.
Eventually higher temperature (Table 2, entry 7) gave a 95:5 ratio
albeit in lower yield (some degradation occurred).
chromatography (SiO2, CH2Cl2/AcOEt 80:20), to give
3 (1.59 g, 50%). A
solution of 3 (1 g, 3.3 mmol) in TFA (4 mL) was stirred at rt for 2 h. After
concentration, the residue was extracted with CH2Cl2 and washed with satd
NaHCO3 soln. After solvent evaporation, the residue was purified by flash
column chromatography (SiO2, CH2Cl2/AcOEt 70:30) to lead to 4 (770 mg,
76%). Mp 125 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): d (ppm): 2.35–2.62 (4H, m);
2.68–2.86 (2H, m); 3.53 (3H, s, OCH3); 3.55 (3H, s, OCH3); 3.59 (3H, s,
OCH3); 3.89 (1H, m); 4.68 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, CHN); 6.34 (1H, s, Har); 6.49
(1H, s, Har); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) (ppm) :27.7 (CH2); 35.1 (CH2); 36.9
(CH2); 45.4 (CH); 52.3 (COOMe); 55.4 (OMe); 55.5 (OMe); 58.4 (CH); 107.6
(CHar); 111.5 (CHar); .125.6 (Car); 127.7 (Car); (147.8 (Car); 147.9 (Car); 169.7
(CO); 173.4 (CO).
10. Castagnoli, N. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 3187–3189.
11. (a) Cushman, M.; Castagnoli, N. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 3404–3406; (b)
Cushman, M.; Gentry, J.; Dekow, F. W. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 1111–1116; (c)
Gonzalez-Lopez, M.; Shaw, J. T. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 164–189.
12. Warrener, R. N.; Liu, L.; Russel, R. A. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 7485–7496.
13. Bose, A. K.; Manhas, M. S.; Ghosh, M.; Raju, V. S.; Tabei, K.; Urbanczyk-
Lipkowska, Z. Heterocycles 1990, 30, 741–744.
14. General procedure: Imine 5 (96 mg; 0.5 mmol) and anhydride 6 or 9 (0.5 mmol)
in 2 mL of solvent were heated in a microwave reactor under stirring. The
solution was concentrated in vacuo, extracted with NaOH 1 M and washed
twice with CH2Cl2. The aqueous layer was acidified by concentrated HCl and
extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 Â 15 mL). The organic layers were dried with
anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo.
The supposed thermodynamic control of the reaction was
checked. On heating (lW reactor, 150 °C, 90 min), the 20:80 mixture
of syn/anti diastereomers 10(arising from THF experiment)was con-
verted into a 50:50 mixture in 80% yield. The reaction was thus
reversible and an acyliminium intermediate could be invoked. This
clearly suggested that the syn isomer should be the thermodynamic
product of this condensation as proposed by Shaw,7 on the basis of
theoretical calculations. Nevertheless, this author did not experi-
mentally verify his proposal and suggested an inverse diastereo-
meric ratio according to the presence, or not, of Et3N, Et3N–HCl.
The syn methyl ester 11a was obtained in 56% from 5 after
treatment of the crude mixture (83:17) of acids 10 with trimethyl-
silyl diazomethane and separation on silica gel column chromatog-
raphy. The reduction of the amide function following the published
method5 (Et3OBF4 then NaBH4, 64%) gave jamtine (1).
15. Analytical data for 8a: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): d (ppm): 1.15–1.35 (3H, m);
1.60–1.85 (3H, m); 2.06 (1H, m); 2.35 (1H, m); 2.47 (1H, m); 2.65–2.76 (3H, m);
3.16 (3H, s, COOMe); 3.80 (3H, s, OCH3); 3.84 (3H, s, OCH3); 4.33 (1H, m); 4.62
(1H, s, CHN); 6.53 (1H, s, Har); 6.59 (1H, s, Har); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3)
(ppm): 21.9 (CH2); 23.0 (CH2); 25.1 (CH2); 28.1 (CH2); 32.4 (CH2); 36.5 (CH2);
51.1 (CH); 51.2 (COOMe); 55.8 (OMe); 56.0 (OMe); 58.8 (Cq); 64.4 (CHN); 111.4
(CHar); 109.5 (CHar); .123.5 (Car); 127.2 (Car); (147.6 (Car); 148.1 (Car); 171.3
(CO); 173.4 (CO).
16. Presser, A.; Hüfner, A. Monatsh. Chem. 2004, 135, 1015–1022.
17. The syn isomer is characterized by a strong upfield shift of the methyl group of
the ester; see Ref. 2a.
18. Compound 8c has not been obtained in pure form, its configuration was
tentatively assigned as anti (C12a–C12b) after examination of the NMR spectra of
the mixture 8a–c.
In summary, we described an efficient and highly convergent
synthesis of ( )-jamtine (1)19 in three steps and 36% overall yield.
References and notes
19. The analytical data of our synthetic material were identical with those
described by Padwa4 and Simpkins5 who mentioned some doubt on the
structure of the natural product.
1. (a) Baussanne, I.; Dudot, B.; Pérard-Viret, J.; Planas, L.; Royer, J. Arkivoc 2006, 7,
57–66. and references cited herein; (b) Fontaine, H.; Baussanne, I.; Royer, J.