react with acetic anhydride to provide the corresponding
acetates.18
Increasing the excess of vinyl oxirane leads to an increase
of the yield, which could be explained by competing Me
transfer from the Zn alkoxide to the vinyl oxirane, although
this product could not be isolated.
More interestingly, aluminum enolates also proved to be
effective, albeit in slighlty lower yield. Magnesium enolates
led to a complex mixture from which not even traces of
product were obtained.
This led us to consider the possibility of combining the
asymmetric conjugate addition (ACA) of dialkylzinc reagents
to enones with enolate trapping with isoprene monoxide in
a one pot procedure, as shown in Scheme 1. Pd should
enhance the reactivity of the vinyl oxirane through the
formation of a π-allyl-Pd complex.
However, despite excellent enantioselectivities on the ACA
reaction, the reaction lead to an approximately trans/cis 2:1
mixture of diastereomers which cannot be driven to the trans
product through epimerization with DBU. This result is however
consistent with results obtained by Caine et al.19 on 2-allyl-
3methylcyclohexanone who found out the thermodynamic
mixture is composed of 65% of trans and 35% of cis isomers.
The reaction also showed moderate E/Z selectivity with 4:1
ratios. Interestingly a Swern oxidation of alcohol 2 led to a 2:1
mixture of cis/trans aldehyde and only one geometric isomer.
This could also serve as a potentially useful synthon for further
functionnalisation (Scheme 2).
Scheme 1. Tandem ACA/Vinyl Oxirane Opening
Early optimization results are outlined in Table 1. We were
pleased to notice that Zn enolate reacted with isoprene
monoxide even in the absence of Pd0 catalyst, albeit in low
yield. The addition of Pd(PPh3)4 seemed to have a positive
effect on the reaction, leading to improved yields (entry 3).
Scheme 2. Oxidation of the Allylic Alcohol
Table 1. Conditions Optimization
Vinyl oxiranes are readily available materials which can
be obtained either by epoxidation of diene precursors or by
olefination of the corresponding aldehydes.20 Cyclic vinyl
oxiranes are available in two steps from the corresponding
cyclic enones.21,22
We therefore decided to prepare some of these substrates
(Scheme 3) and investigate the scope of the reaction by
changing the Michael acceptors and the R,ꢀ-unsaturated
oxiranes (Table 2).
The zinc enolates resulting from the highly stereoselective
methyl additions were treated with various oxirane electro-
philes. Not suprisingly, butadiene and isoprene monoxide
gave the best results. However, although no noticeable
amount of the branched addition adduct was isolated, the
trans/cis
nucl.
(equiv)
equiv
E+
ratiob;
entry
catalyst
/
yield
E:Z (eec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ZnMe2 (1.2)
ZnMe2 (1.2)
ZnMe2 (1.2)
ZnMe2 (1.2)
ZnMe2 (1.2)
AlMe3 (1.2)
MeMgBr (1.2)
1.5
30% 2/1; 4:1 (96%)
1.5 Ni(OAc)2 5% 33%a 2.5/1; n.d.
1.1 Pd(PPh3)4 5% 61% 2/1; 4:1
1.5 Pd(PPh3)4 5% 55%d 2/1; 4:1 (98%)
1.5 Pd(PPh3)4 5% 74% 2/1; 4:1
1.5 Pd(PPh3)4 5% 40% 2/1; 4:1. (91%)
5
Pd(PPh3)4 5%
/
/
a All yields presented in the table are isolated yield after column
chromatography; b Determined by 1H NMR; c Determined by GC. d Reaction
performed in Et2O.
(15) Dijk, E. W.; Panella, L.; Pinho, P.; Naasz, R.; Meetsma, A.;
Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9687–9693.
(16) Rathgeb, X.; March, S.; Alexakis, A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5737–
5742.
Although Et2O gave also an acceptable yield (entry 4,
55%), we noticed that toluene gave slightly superior results.
(17) Kitamura, M.; Miki, T.; Nakano, K.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 5141–5144.
(18) Vuagnoux-d’Augustin, M.; Alexakis, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 7408–7412.
(10) Xu, Y.-J.; Liu, Q.-Z.; Dong, L. Synlett 2007, 2, 273–277.
(11) Agapiou, K.; Cauble, D. F; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 4528–4529.
(19) Caine, D.; Chao, S. T.; Smith, H. A. Organic Syntheses 1977, 56,
52.
(12) Degrado, S. J.; Mizutani, H.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 755–756.
(20) Olofsson, B; Somfai, P. Vinylepoxides in organic synthesis. In
Aziridines and Epoxides in Organic Synthesis; Yudin, A. K., Ed.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; pp 315-347.
(13) Knopff, O.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3835–3837.
(14) Naasz, R.; Arnold, L. A.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. Chem.
Commun. 2001, 735–736.
(21) Felix, D.; Wintner, C.; Eschenmoser, A. Org. Synth. 1988, 6, 679.
(22) Tanis, S. P.; Herrinton, P. M. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3988–96.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 3, 2010
577