systematic investigation has been carried out on the applica-
tion of organic dyes to sensitized H2 generation from water.
In 1985, Shimidzu et al. reported that H2 generation can be
sensitized by xanthene dyes under visible-light irradiation
using Pt-loaded metal-oxide particles and triethanolamine as
a sacrificial electron donor.9 In recent years, considerable
improvements in H2-generation efficiency have been achieved
with similar reaction systems, in which Pt/TiO2 or related
solid catalysts are modified with organic dyes, particularly
Eosin Y.10 In general, neutral chromophoric cores of
conventional organic dyes are intrinsically hydrophobic.
Consequently, the poor water miscibility should give rise to
complex features in the dye/TiO2 interface with the water
phase as well as in the conformation/aggregation behavior
of the dyes adsorbed on the hydrophilic TiO2 surface, which
have critical effects on the electron-transfer and chemical
processes involved in H2 generation.
with the efficiencies depending on the substituent R. Mod-
erately hydrophilic DEO1 and DEO2 showed substantially
higher sensitization activities at a lower loading than
hydrophobic D-H, whereas intermediate behavior was ob-
served in the cases of slightly hydrophilic DMOM and most
hydrophilic DEO3.
Table 1. Photophysical Properties of the Dyes in THF
a
c
d
e
dye
λabs (nm) εb (M-1 cm-1
)
λF (nm) τF (ns) ΦF
D-H
433
432
433
433
432
27,360
26,730
31,580
27,550
35,460
552
561
559
557
557
1.18
1.25
1.26
1.31
1.19
0.23
0.24
0.22
0.24
0.21
DMOM
DEO1
DEO2
DEO3
a Absorption maxima. b Molar absorption coefficients. c Fluorescence
maxima. d Fluorescence lifetimes. e Fluorescence quantum yield was
measured using rhodamine B as a reference at rt.
Scheme 1. Synthetic Routes to the Dyes 6R
Figure 1. CV trace in THF using [n-Bu4N]PF6 (0.1 M) as a
supporting electrolyte and Fc/Fc+ reference and DFT-generated
population densities of the HOMO and LUMO for DEO2.
Scheme 1 summarizes the synthetic routes for the dyes;
the experimental details for the synthetic procedures and
spectroscopic data for identification are given in the Sup-
porting Information (SI). The dyes in tetrahydrofuran (THF)
commonly reveal the visible absorption maxima at 432-433
nm and relatively strong fluorescence at 552-561 nm with
lifetimes of 1.18-1.31 ns (Table 1). Cyclic voltammetry
(CV) measurements for THF solutions of the dyes show clear
one-electron oxidation/reduction peaks, as shown in Figure
1 for a typical CV trace of DEO2. The apparent half-wave
oxidation and reduction potentials of the dyes are commonly
+(0.46-0.49) V and -(2.06-2.08) V, respectively, vs the
Fc/Fc+ reference (see Figure S4 in SI). From the CV data
coupled with the longest absorption edge, the HOMO and
LUMO levels of the dyes were estimated to be (5.26-5.29)
eV and (2.78-2.82) eV below the vacuum level, respectively.
DFT MO calculations of the dyes indicated that the HOMO
and LUMO largely populate on the diphenylaminophenyl-
2,2′-bithiophene donor and cyanoacrylic acid acceptor,
respectively, as shown in Figure 1 for DEO2 as a typical
example. Therefore, the electronic properties of the dyes are
essentially identical independent of the substituent R.
This study aims to explore the significance of hydrophilic
and steric characteristics of organic dyes in sensitized H2
generation based on Pt/TiO2 catalysts using a series of (E)-
3-[5-(4-(p,p′-bis(R-phenyl)amino)phenyl)-2,2′-bithiophen-2′-
yl]-2-cyanoacrylic acid dyes, which are the hydrophobic
parent dye (R ) H, D-H), slightly hydrophilic DMOM (R
)
CH2OCH3,), and hydrophilic DEO1-3 (R
)
CH2-(OCH2CH2)n-OCH3, n ) 1-3). It was found that Pt/
TiO2 particles modified with the dyes work as effective
catalysts for visible-light-induced H2 evolution from water
(8) (a) Kim, S.; Lee, J. K.; Kang, S. O.; Ko, J.; Yum, J.-H.; Fantacci,
S.; De Angelis, F.; Di Censo, D.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Gra¨tzel, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16701. (b) Mishra, A.; Fischer, M. K. R.; Ba¨uerle,
P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2474. (c) Moon, S.-J.; Yum, J.-H.;
Humphry-Baker, R.; Karlsson, K. M.; Hagberg, D. P.; Marinado, T.;
Hagfeldt, A.; Sun, L.; Gra¨tzel, M.; Nazeeruddin, M. K. J. Phys. Chem. C
2009, 113, 16816.
(9) Shimidzu, T.; Iyoda, T.; Koide, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
35.
(10) (a) Abe, R.; Hara, K.; Sayama, K.; Domen, K.; Arakawa, H. J.
Photochem. Photobiol. A 2000, 137, 63. (b) Abe, R.; Sayama, K.; Arakawa,
H. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2004, 166, 115. (c) Li, Q.; Jin, Z.; Peng, Z.;
Li, Y.; Li, S.; Lu, G. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 8237. (d) Li, Y.; Xie,
C.; Peng, S.; Lu, G.; Li, S. J. Mol. Catal. A 2008, 282, 117. (e) Reisner,
E.; Fontecilla-Camps, J. C.; Armstrong, F. A. Chem. Commun. 2009, 550.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 3, 2010
461