Med Chem Res (2011) 20:695–704
703
(NH), 1739 (C=O stretching), 1573, 1485, 1056,(thiazo-
line), 3003 (Ar-H stretching); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 5.33 (s,
1H, Ar-OH), 5.97 (s, 1H, thiazoline), 7.09–8.01 (m, 11H,
Ar-H), 7.76 (s, 1H, CO-NH). EIMS (m/z, 100%): 490
([M ? 2], 100%). Anal. C22H14Cl3N3O2S: C, 53.86/53.84;
H, 2.87/2.88; N, 8.55/8.56.
½ðTi ꢁ TzÞ=ðC ꢁ TzÞꢂ ꢃ 100 for concentrations for which
Ti [= ¼ Tz
½ðTi ꢁ TzÞ=Tzꢂ ꢃ 100 for concentrations forwhich Ti\Tz:
Five dose response parameters are calculated for each
experimental agent. Growth inhibition of 50 % (GI50) is
calculated from [(Ti - Tz)/(C - Tz)] 9 100 = 50, which
is the drug concentration resulting in a 50% reduction in
the net protein increase (as measured by SRB staining) in
control cells during the drug incubation. The drug con-
centration resulting in total growth inhibition (TGI) is
calculated from Ti = Tz. The LC50 (concentration of drug
resulting in a 50% reduction in the measured protein at the
end of the drug treatment as compared to that at the
beginning) indicating a net loss of cells following treatment
is calculated from [(Ti - Tz)/Tz] 9 100 = -50. Values
are calculated for each of these three parameters if the level
of activity is reached; however, if the effect is not reached
or is exceeded, the value for that parameter is expressed as
greater or less than the maximum or minimum concentra-
tion tested.
6.b Yield: 1.9 g (56%), mp 233–234°C (ethanol/water),
Rf: 0.65 (acetonitrile/methanol, 1:1), IR (KBr) cm-1: 3234
(NH), 1740 (C=O stretching), 1572, 1480, 1052 (thiazo-
line), 3003 (Ar-H stretching); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 3.26 (s,
1H, OCH3–C6H4), 5.32 (s, 1H, Ar-OH), 5.97 (s, 1H,
thiazoline), 6.89–8.01 (m, 11H, Ar-H), 7.76 (s, 1H, CO-
NH). EIMS (m/z, 100%): 488 ([M ? 2], 100%). Anal.
C24H20ClN3O4S: C, 59.72/59.81; H, 4.12/4.18; N, 8.63/
8.72.
6.c Yield: 1.8 g (61%), mp 221–222°C (ethanol/water),
Rf: 0.63 (acetonitrile/methanol, 1:1), IR (KBr) cm-1: 3217
(NH), 1740 (C=O stretching), 1562, 1481, 1061 (thiazo-
line), 3018 (Ar-H stretching); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 2.32 (s,
1H, Ar-CH3), 2.22 (s, 6H, CH3), 5.30 (s, 1H, Ar-OH), 6.22
(s, 1H, thiazoline), 6.86–7.81 (m, 11H, Ar-H), 7.80 (s, 1H,
CO–NH). EIMS (m/z, 100%): 429 ([M ? 2], 100%).
Anal. C25H23N3O2S: C, 68.90/69.91; H, 5.41/5.40; N, 9.77/
9.78.
Acknowledgment We are grateful to Dr. V. L. Narayanan from
Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch, National Cancer Institute,
Bethesda, MD, USA, for in vitro evaluation of anticancer activity.
6.d Yield: 2.2 g (76%), mp 197–198°C (ethanol/water),
Rf: 0.72 (acetonitrile/methanol, 1:1), IR (KBr) cm-1: 1040
(Ar-F stretching), 3218 (NH), 1732 (C=O stretching),
1571, 1484, 1063 (thiazoline), 3009 (Ar-H stretching), 865
(Ar-F stretching); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 3.26 (s, 1H, OCH3–
C6H5), 5.12 (s, 1H, Ar-OH), 6.88 (s, 1H, thiazoline), 6.88–
8.01 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 7.30 (s, 1H, CO–NH). EIMS (m/z,
100%): 435 ([M ? 2], 100%). Anal. C23H18FN3O3S: C,
63.43/63.44; H, 4.15/4.17; N, 9.64/9.65.
References
Abadi H, Eissa AA (2003) Synthesis of novel 1,3,4-trisubstituted
pyrazole derivatives and their evaluation as antitumor and
antiangiogenic agents. Chem Pharm Bull 51–7:833–847
´
´
Aguilera N, Castro MA, Garcıa-Gravalos MD, Gordaliza M, Miguel
del Corral JM, Molinari A, Oliva A, San Feliciano A (2000) New
antineoplastic prenylhydroquinones. Synthesis and evaluation.
Bioorg Med Chem 8:1027–1032
´
´
Araya C, Castro MA, Garcıa-Gravalos MD, Miguel del Corral JM,
Molinari A, Oliva A, San Feliciano A (2004) Cytotoxic-
antineoplastic activity of acetyl derivatives of prenylnaphthohy-
droquinone. Il Farmaco 59:651–656
Anticancer activity
Primary anticancer assay was performed at human tumor
cell lines panel derived from nine neoplastic diseases, in
accordance with the protocol of the Drug Evaluation
Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. The cytotoxic
and/or growth inhibitory effects of the most active selected
compounds were tested in vitro against the full panel of
about 60 human tumor cell lines at 10-fold dilutions of five
concentrations ranging from 10-4–10-8 to 10-8 M. A 48-h
continuous drug-exposure protocol was followed and an
SRB protein assay was used to estimate cell viability or
growth. Using the seven absorbance measurements [time
zero (Tz), control growth in the absence of drug (C), and
test growth in the presence of drug at the five concentration
levels (Ti)], the percentage growth was calculated at each
of the drug concentrations levels. Percentage growth inhi-
bition was calculated as:
Bhandari SV, Patil AA, Sarkate AP, Gore SG, Bothra KG (2009)
Design synthesis and pharmacological screening of noval
antihypertensive agents using hybrid approach. Bioorg Med
Chem 17(1):390-400
Bonde CG, Gaikwad NJ (2004) Synthesis and preliminary evaluation
of some pyrazine containing thiazolines and thiazolidinones as
antimicrobial agents. Bioorg Med Chem 12:2151–2161
Broughton HB, Castro MA, Chamorro P, Garcı0a-Gra0valos MD,
Gordaliza M, Mahiques MM, Miguel del Corral JM, Molinari A,
San Feliciano A (2001) New selective cytotoxic diterpenylqui-
nones and diterpenylhydroquinones. J Med Chem 44:1257–1267
´
´
Castro MA, Garcıa-Gravalos MD, Gordaliza M, Mahiques MM,
Miguel del Corral JM, San Feliciano A (1996) Synthesis and
bioactivity of new antineoplastic terpenylquinones. Bioorg Med
Chem Lett 6:1859–1864
´
´
Castro MA, Garcıa-Gravalos MD, Gordaliza M, Mahiques MM,
Miguel del Corral JM, San Feliciano A (1998) Further antineo-
plastic terpenylquinones and terpenylhydroquinones. Bioorg
Med Chem 6:31–41
123