Table 2. NHC-Catalyzed Reactions of 1 and 2a
Table 3. NHC-Catalyzed Directly Amination of 1 and 5a
time yieldc
b
1, R1
1a, Ph
1a, Ph
1a, Ph
1c, 4-BrC6H4
1i, 4-MeC6H4
1d, 4-MeOC6H4 i-PrO i-PrO 5b
1a, Ph
1a, Ph
R3
R4
5
time (h) yield (%)
entry
1, R1, X
1a, Ph, Cl
1a, Ph, Cl
1a, Ph, Cl
1a, Ph, Cl
1b, Ph, Br
1c, 4-BrC6H4, Cl
1c, 4-BrC6H4, Cl
1c, 4-BrC6H4, Cl
1c, 4-BrC6H4, Cl
1d,4-MeOC6H4,Cl 2e, 2-MeC6H4, Et
1e, 4-NO2C6H4, Cl 2a, Ph, Et
2, R2, R
2a, Ph, Et
2b, 4-FC6H4, Me
2c, 4-ClC6H4, Et
2d, styryl, Et
2a, Ph, Et
2e, 2-MeC6H4, Et
2f, 4-MeOC6H4, Et
2g, 2-fury, Et
2h, nPr, Et
(h)
(%)
entry
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
EtO
EtO
5a
12
12
12
12
18
24
12
12
6a, 54
6b, 73
6c, 68
6d, 61
6e, 42
6f, 22
trace
1
2
2
2
2
12
2
3
8
5
4
8
4a, 75
4b, 63
4c, 58
4d, 53
4a, 61
4e, 81
4f, 42
4g, 45
4h, 32
4i, 83
4j, 21
4k, 36
N.R.
i-PrO i-PrO 5b
BnO BnO 5c
i-PrO i-PrO 5b
i-PrO i-PrO 5b
3
4b
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Ph
Ph
Ph
MeO 5e
5d
N.R.
a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), 5 (1.5 mmol), and 3b (10 mol %)
in 8 mL of THF and DBU (1.25 mmol) in 2 mL of THF were added slowly
over 2 h at -20 °C and the mixture reacted for the indicated time. b Yield
of isolated product.
3
8
12
1f, styryl, Cl
1g, 1-naphthyl, Cl 2a, Ph, Et
2i, Ph, Me
a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.75 mmol), 2 (0.5 mmol), and 3b (10 mol
%) in 8 mL of THF and DBU (0.75 mmol) in 2 mL of THF were added
slowly over 2 h at -20 °C and the mixture eacted for indicated time. b 20
mol % of 3b. c Yield of isolated product.
electron-rich enal 1d conducted this reaction sluggishly and
rendered the corresponding product 6f in reduced yield,
accompanying by the formation of hydrazine 7 (Table 3,
entry 6).16 Moreover, the electronic property of diazenes
played a critical role in the cyclization reaction; currently,
N,N′-dibenzoyldiazene 5d and azocarboxylate 5e yielded no
desired products.
Scheme 2. Cross-Coupling of 1a and 2j
A postulated catalytic cycle for the NHCs-catalyzed
tandem cross-cyclization/elimination reaction is depicted in
Scheme 3. Thus, 3-chloroenal 1 is first attacked by the in
situ formed imidazolium carbene I to afford ꢀ-chloro-
conjugated Breslow intermediate II,17 which could be
stabilized by resonance to homoenolate III. This in turn
attacks activated diazene 5, followed by tautomerization to
produce zwitterion IV. The latter intermediate undergoes
intramolecular acylation to furnish lactam V with the
similar conversion, albeit in a reduced yield (Table 2, entry
5). Interestingly, it occurs smoothly with a dienal 1f also,
rendering 4k selectively in 36% yield (Table 2, entry 12).
However, the placement of 1-naphthyl in the ꢀ-position, 1g,
provided none of the desired butenolide (Table 2, entry 13).
This result indicated that the steric nature in the aromatic
tether of 1 conducted dramatic effects on this conversion.
The incongruity between the substrate scope of the current
butenolide-forming cyclizations and that of the usual cin-
namaldehyde lactonization6,14 invited further exploration on
their unique reactivity of ꢀ-chloroenals in the prescence of
NHCs. Thus, 1a and different activated diazenes 5 were
reacted to explore the possibility of a direct elctrophilic
amination in the presence of 3b.15 Not surprisingly, while
azodicarboxylate 5a proved to be unsuitable nitrogen-
containing electrophile for cinnamaldehyde amination,15a it
readily cyclized with 1a to afford pyrazolone 6a in the
presence of imidazolium salt 3b and DBU (Table 3, entry
1). By using 3 equiv of diazenes, the reaction scope
accommodated various ꢀ-aryl chloroenals 1 as well as a set
of azodicarboxylates 5a-c (Table 3, entries 1-6). However,
(12) For previous condensation of enals and enones via homoenolate,
see: (a) Nair, V.; Vellalath, S.; Poonoth, M.; Suresh, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 8736. (b) Wadamoto, M.; Phillips, E. M.; Reynolds, T. E.;
Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10098. (c) Chiang, P.-C.;
Kaeobamrung, J.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3520. (d)
Phillips, E. M.; Wadamoto, M.; Chan, A.; Scheidt, K. A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3107. (e) Nair, V.; Babu, B. P.; Vellalath, S.; Varghese,
V.; Raveendran, A. E.; Suresh, E. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2507. (f) Kaeobam-
rung, J.; Bode, J. W. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 677.
(13) Arnold, Z.; Holy´, A. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1961, 26,
3059. (b) Robertson, I. R.; Sharp, J. T. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 3095. (c)
Lilienkampf, A.; Johansson, M. P.; Wahala, K. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3387,
and references cited therein.
(14) (a) Hirano, K.; Piel, I.; Glorius, F. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350,
984. (b) Li, Y.; Zhao, Z.-A.; He, H.; You, S.-L. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008,
350, 1885.
(15) For previous NHCs catalyzed elctrophilic C-N bond formation,
see: (a) Chan, A.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2740. (b)
Huang, X.-L.; He, L.; Shao, P.-L.; Ye, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
192. (c) Seayad, J.; Patra, P. K.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, J. Y. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 953. (d) Yang, L.; Tan, B.; Wang, F.; Zhong, G. F. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 1744.
(16) Similar results were observed in the reaction of acylaryldiazene
with cinnamaldehyde, which presumably due to the related concomitant
hydride transfer, which consumed the homoenolate and thus decreased the
yield of 6f; see ref 15a.
(17) Breslow, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 3719.
642
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 3, 2010