210
E.S. Koumousi et al. / Polyhedron 29 (2010) 204–211
currently exploring the reactions of 2-pyridyl oximes with cop-
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
per(II) acetylacetonate in order to test the differences in the mag-
netic coupling induced by various b-diketonate ligands. Work also
is in progress in our groups to synthesize high-nuclearity cop-
per(II)/b-diketonate/2-pyridyl oximate clusters.
Supplementary data
CCDC 730888, 730889 and 730890 contain the supplementary
crystallographic data for 1, 2 and 3. These data can be obtained free
from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road,
Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or e-mail:
χ
T / K
300
0
50
100
150
200
250
Acknowledgements
Fig. 6. Plot of
vVT vs. T for 1 in a 10 kG field. The solid lines are the best fit of the
experimental data; see the text for the fit parameters.
This work was supported by EPEAEK II (Program PYTHAGORAS
I, Grant b.365.037 to S.P.P.) and MEC (Grant CTQ2006-01759 to
A.E.). We thank K.A. Kounavi for experimental assistance.
the remarkable ability of the oximato bridges to mediate strong
antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between paramagnetic
centers, either in syn, anti, or O-monoatomic coordination [1a,22].
Extended-Huckel MO calculations previously reported by some of
us [22h] and others [22f] on the Cu–(R@N–O)2–Cu core (R = various
substituted groups) have indicated that planar Cu–(R@N–O)2–Cu
‘‘rings” favor the strongest magnetic coupling, but other factors
such as the electronic properties of the R-substituted oximato
groups and/or the ligands that complete the coordination sphere
of the CuII ions (i.e., hfacꢁ in 1 and 2) play an important role modu-
lating the magnitude of the coupling [22h]. Complex 1 exhibits a
very strong antiferromagnetic coupling (J = ꢁ720 cmꢁ1) typical for
References
[1] (a) For an excellent review, see P. Chaudhuri, Coord. Chem. Rev. 243 (2003)
143;
(b) A.J.L. Pombeiro, V. Yu Kukushkin, in: J.A. McCleverty, T.J. Meyer (Eds.),
Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry II, vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004, p.
631.
[2] (a) R.J. Butcher, C.J. O’Connor, E. Sinn, Inorg. Chem. 20 (1981) 537;
(b) C.J. Milios, C.P. Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, F. Lloret, R. Vicente, S.P. Perlepes, A.
Escuer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 210;
(c) For a comprehensive review, see:C.J. Milios, Th.C. Stamatatos, S.P. Perlepes,
Polyhedron 25 (2006) 134 (Polyhedron Report);
(d) For an excellent review, see: C.J. Milios, S. Piligkos, E.K. Brechin, Dalton
Trans. (2008) 1809 (Dalton Perspective);
the members of the family of doubly N,O oximato-bridged CuII
2
(e) Th.C. Stamatatos, C. Papatriantafyllopoulou, E. Katsoulakou, C.P.
Raptopoulou, S.P. Perlepes, Polyhedron 26 (2007) 1830.
[3] (a) P. Chaudhuri, M. Winter, F. Birkelbach, P. Fleischhauer, W. Haase, U. Flörke,
H.-J. Haupt, Inorg. Chem. 30 (1991) 4291;
complexes [22f,22h]. The coupling interaction is almost the same
with that observed in complex [Cu2(Hboa)2(H2O)2](ClO4)2, where
Hboaꢁ is the monoanion of biacetyl oxime azine [23]. Of particular
interest is complex [LCuII{(py)C(H)NO}2CuIII](ClO4), where
L = 1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane and (py)C(H)NOꢁ the
2-pyridylaldoximate(-1) ligand, in which the CuII centers are very
strongly antiferromagnetically coupled, the singlet–triplet splitting
being greater than 1000 cmꢁ1. It should be mentioned at this point
that the structurally similar complex [Cu2{(py)pko}4]ꢀ2H2O [13c] is
also diamagnetic at room temperature; however, an estimation of
the coupling constant was not provided.
(b) S. Ross, T. Weyhermüller, E. Bill, K. Wieghardt, P. Chaudhuri, Inorg. Chem.
40 (2001) 6656;
(c) C. Lampropoulos, Th.C. Stamatatos, K.A. Abboud, G. Christou, Inorg. Chem.
48 (2009) 429;
(d) S. Khanra, T. Weyhermüller, P. Chaudhuri, Dalton Trans. (2007) 4675.
[4] For example, see: R. Clérac, H. Miyasaka, M. Yamashita, C. Coulon, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 124 (2002) 12837.
[5] F. Mori, T. Nyui, T. Ishida, T. Nogami, K.-Y. Choi, H. Nojiri, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128
(2006) 1440.
[6] For an excellent review, see: H. Miyasaka, R. Clérac, Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 78
(2005) 1725.
[7] (a) C.J. Milios, P. Kyritsis, C.P. Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, R. Vicente, A. Escuer, S.P.
Perlepes, Dalton Trans. (2005) 501;
4. Conclusions
(b) Th.C. Stamatatos, K.V. Pringouri, C.P. Raptopoulou, R. Vicente, V. Psycharis,
A. Escuer, S.P. Perlepes, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 9 (2006) 1178;
(c) K.V. Pringouri, C.P. Raptopoulou, A. Escuer, Th.C. Stamatatos, Inorg. Chim.
Acta 360 (2007) 69.
The present work extends the body of results that emphasize
the ability of 2-pyridyl oximes to form interesting structural types
in CuII coordination chemistry when they are combined with suit-
able ancillary ligands, such as carboxylates [12] or non-carboxyl-
ates [13]. The employment of the Cu/hfacꢁ/(py)C(R)NOH (R = ph,
py) reaction system has provided access to two new members of
the growing family of doubly, N,O oximato-bridged dinuclear com-
plexes and a mononuclear, hfacꢁ-free compound [CuCl{(py)pko}
{(py)pkoH}] (3). The representative dinuclear complex 1 has been
found to possess an isolated S = 0 spin ground state due to the very
strong antiferromagnetic coupling between the two CuII centers
through the double @N–Oꢁ bridges. This coupling gives a massive
value for the coupling constant J of ꢁ720 cmꢁ1. In order to gain
more insight into this important subject, i.e., the in-depth under-
standing of the exact structural parameters that influence the sign
and strength of the magnitude of the coupling in the Cu–(R@N–
O)2–Cu type of complexes, more examples of such compounds
are needed, preferably closely related ones displaying variation
over only one of the structural parameters. For example, we are
[8] (a) C.J. Milios, C.P. Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, R. Vicente, A. Escuer, S.P. Perlepes,
Inorg. Chem. Commun. 6 (2003) 1056;
(b) C.J. Milios, E. Kefalloniti, C.P. Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, R. Vicente, N. Lalioti, A.
Escuer, S.P. Perlepes, Chem. Commun. (2003) 819;
(c) C.J. Milios, E. Kefalloniti, C.P. Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, A. Escuer, R. Vicente,
S.P. Perlepes, Polyhedron 23 (2004) 83;
(d) C.J. Milios, Th.C. Stamatatos, P. Kyritsis, A. Terzis, C.P. Raptopoulou, R.
Vicente, A. Escuer, S.P. Perlepes, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2004) 2885;
(e) Th.C. Stamatatos, D. Foguet-Albiol, C.C. Stoumpos, C.P. Raptopoulou, A.
Terzis, W. Wernsdorfer, S.P. Perlepes, G. Christou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005)
15380;
(f) Th.C. Stamatatos, D. Foguet-Albiol, S.-C. Lee, C.C. Stoumpos, C.P.
Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, W. Wernsdorfer, S.O. Hill, S.P. Perlepes, G. Christou, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 9484;
(g) C.C. Stoumpos, Th.C. Stamatatos, H. Sartzi, O. Roubeau, A.J. Tasiopoulos, V.
Nastopoulos, S.J. Teat, G. Christou, S.P. Perlepes, Dalton Trans. (2009) 1004.
[9] Th.C. Stamatatos, A.K. Boudalis, Y. Sanakis, C.P. Raptopoulou, Inorg. Chem. 45
(2006) 7372.
[10] (a) Th.C. Stamatatos, S. Dionyssopoulou, G. Efthymiou, P. Kyritsis, C.P.
Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, R. Vicente, A. Escuer, S.P. Perlepes, Inorg. Chem. 44
(2005) 3374;
(b) Th.C. Stamatatos, A. Bell, P. Cooper, A. Terzis, C.P. Raptopoulou, S.L. Heath,
R.E.P. Winpenny, S.P. Perlepes, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 8 (2005) 533.