2036 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2010
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1-3
Stanley et al.
nine. This architecture provides a rigid environment around
the europium ion, helping to limit nonradiative deactivation
pathways and exclude solvent interactions that can lead to
the quenching of lanthanide luminescence.5 The exclusion of
water is extremely important for lanthanide complexes be-
cause luminescence from the excited state is easily quenched
by the harmonics of the O-H oscillator.5 Our approach
involves the coupling of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT)
to bis(pyrazolyl)pyridine in order to optimize the match be-
tween the ligand triplet excited state and the excited state of
the EuIII ion by taking advantage of the extended conjugation
resulting from the addition of the thiophene derivative and
the increased electron richness of EDOT over that of thio-
phene alone. In addition, the sulfur atoms present in EDOT
induce greater spin-orbit coupling because of the heavy-
atom effect, resulting in a higher population of the ligand
triplet state and a more efficient energy transfer to the metal
center. Herein we report the synthesis, characterization,
and photophysical properties of three nine-coordinated
trivalent europium complexes: Eu(hfac)3(L) (1; hfac =
1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoro-2,4-pentanedionate); Eu(tta)3(L) (2;
tta = 2-thenoyltrifluoroacetonate); Eu(btfac)3(L) (3; btfac =
4,4,4-trifluoro-1-phenyl-1,3-butanedionate).
Figure 1. (A) ORTEP diagram of 1 showing the labeling scheme of
selected atoms at a 30% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted
˚
for clarity. Selected bond lengths (A) and angles (deg) are as follows:
Eu1-O6 2.362(3), Eu1-O5b 2.395(3), Eu1-O5a 2.411(3), Eu1-O6b
2.412(3), Eu1-O6a 2.423(3), Eu1-O5 2.481(3), Eu1-N1 2.559(4), Eu1-
N5 2.563(4), Eu1-N3 2.630(4); N1-Eu1-N5 118.74(12), N1-Eu1-N3
61.21(11), N5-Eu1-N3 60.71(12), O6-Eu1-N1 145.89(11), O5b-
Eu1-N1 68.98(11), O5a-Eu1-N1 70.70(11), O6b-Eu1-N1 138.34(11),
O6a-Eu1-N1 107.05(12), O5-Eu1-N1 81.91(11), O6-Eu1-N5
75.40(12), O5b-Eu1-N5 107.05(12), O5a-Eu1-N5 139.69(12),
O6b-Eu1-N5 66.62(12), O6a-Eu1-N5 131.17(12), O5-Eu1-N5
73.47(12), O6-Eu1-N3 134.29(11), O5b-Eu1-N3 70.13(12), O5a-
Eu1-N3 127.07(11), O6b-Eu1-N3 97.08(11), O6a-Eu1-N3 144.87(11),
O5-Eu1-N3 82.92(11). (B) Coordination environment around EuIII in 1.
The title ligand, L, was synthesized by Stille coupling of
2,6-bis(4-iodopyrazol-1-yl)pyridine and 2-(tributylstannyl)-
3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene in the presence of Pd(PPh3)2Cl2
1
and was characterized by melting point, H NMR, electro-
spray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), and elemental
analysis. Complexes 1-3 were prepared by reacting L and the
appropriate europium(III) tris(β-diketonate) dihydrate in
toluene (Scheme 1) and were characterized by melting point,
ESI-MS, and elemental analysis.
The solid-state structure of 1 was confirmed by single-
crystal X-ray crystallography (Figure 1A).12 The geometry
around the nine-coordinated EuIII ion is a slightly distorted
tricapped trigonal prism in which the metal ion lies at the
center (Figure 1B). It is defined by six oxygen atoms from the
β-diketonate ligands and three nitrogen atoms from L. The
average EuIII-N and EuIII-O bond distances are 2.600 and
Table 1. Photophysical Properties of L and Europium(III) Complexes 1-3 in
CH2Cl2 at Room Temperature
compound
λex (nm)
Φfl (%)
ΦEuIII (%)
τ (μs)
L
1
2
3
339
332
343
330
29.2 ( 1.3
6.1 ( 0.7
0.8 ( 0.3
1.4 ( 0.4
16.4 ( 1.4
27.5 ( 1.2
22.2 ( 0.3
581
473
576
˚
˚
2.412 A, respectively, and fall within the ranges [2.52-2.68 A
III
III
˚
(Eu -N) and 2.31-2.50 A (Eu -O)] reported for similar
(Figure 2A), the absorption spectrum closely follows the
excitation spectrum and displays a broad band (λmax=339 nm)
that is red-shifted compared to that of 2,6-bis(pyrazol-1-
yl)pyridine (λmax = 304 nm) because of the extended conju-
gation caused by the presence of the EDOT moieties. The
emission spectrum displays a broad band (λmax = 378 nm)
corresponding to ligand fluorescence, confirmed by a small
Stokes shift and a short excited-state lifetime. Upon cooling
to 77 K in a solvent glass, an increase in the emission intensity
and the presence of a previously absent vibrational structure
can be seen. These observations are attributed to the reduc-
tion of thermal nonradiative pathways available for energy
loss. Ligand phosphorescence is seen (Figure 2B) from 484 to
650 nm, and the energy of the ligand triplet state is measured
as 20 700 cm-1, which is 3700 cm-1 greater than that of the
structures.13-16
The photophysical properties of L have been studied in
solution and under a variety of conditions, the details of which
have been summarized in Table 1. At room temperature
(12) Crystal data for 1: C38H20EuF18N5O10S2, M = 1264.67, triclinic,
˚
˚
˚
space group P1, a = 13.175(3) A, b = 13.625(3) A, c = 14.527(3) A, R =
3
˚
68.77(3)°, β = 78.73(2)°, γ = 68.60(2)°, V = 2257.1(8) A , Z = 2, Dcalcd
=
1.861 g cm-3, μ=1.618 mm-1, T=153(2) K, R1=0.0418, R2=0.1014.
(13) Holz, R. C.; Thompson, L. C. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 4640–4644.
(14) De Silva, C. R.; Wang, R.; Zheng, Z. Polyhedron 2006, 25, 3449–
3455.
(15) Li, X.-L.; Dai, F.-R.; Zhang, L.-Y.; Zhu, Y.-M.; Peng, Q.; Chen,
Z.-N. Organometallics 2007, 26, 4483–4490.
ꢀ
(16) Ziessel, R.; Diring, S.; Kadjane, P.; Charbonniere, L.; Retailleau, P.;
Philouze, C. Chem. Asian J. 2007, 2, 975–982.