C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
interaction probably operates through effective spin delocalization
ibility of 6 is noteworthy, since 6 gradually reaches an equilibrium
between two conformers in solution, as revealed by TLC analysis,
UV-vis-NIR absorption, and 19F NMR spectra. According to the
19F NMR analysis, the ratio of the helical conformer to the other
conformer is ∼2:1 (see the SI).
over the helical π conjugation.15
Scheme 2. Oxidative Cleavage of Biscopper Heptaphyrin 5
In summary, oxidative cleavage of meso-aryl-substituted [36]oc-
taphyrin and [32]heptaphyrin provided fully π-conjugated helices
as bis-Cu(II) complexes with smoothly π-conjugated networks.
These helical molecules exhibited NIR absorption bands with large
absorbance as evidence of full π conjugation, hence showing that
linear oligopyrromethenes are particularly suitable for the formation
of fully π-conjugated helices upon appropriate metal coordination.
These transformations constitute a new synthetic route to linear
oligopyrromethenes via a topological change from a figure-eight
macrocycle to a coiling helix. Chiral resolution and further
elongation of such π-conjugated helices are actively being pursued
in our laboratory.
We also found that figure-eight bis-Cu(II) heptaphyrin 5 with
unique T-shaped coordination16 gradually changed in air over 3
weeks to give brown product 6 in 45% yield with the recovery of
5 (52%) (Scheme 2). Here again, the oxygen source for 6 was
determined to be molecular oxygen, since 5 was stable under inert
gas. The structure of 6 was determined by XRD analysis to be a
genuine helix with a constant helix pitch of ∼4.0 Å and a Cu-Cu
distance of 3.25 Å (Figure 3).13 Cu(1) is bound to the four nitrogen
atoms of pyrrole rings A, B, C, and D with distances of 1.95, 1.92,
1.95, and 2.02 Å, respectively, while Cu(2) is bound to the three
nitrogen atoms of pyrrole ring E, F, and G with distances of 1.92,
1.94, and 1.88 Å, respectively, and to the terminal benzoyl oxygen
atom with a distance of 2.20 Å. In addition, a Cu(1)-N(4)-Cu(2)
network with distances of 2.02 and 2.61 Å for Cu(1)-N(4) and
Cu(2)-N(4), respectively, and an angle of 88.4° for Cu(1)-N(4)-
Cu(2) was observed. Importantly, the helical 34 π electron network
is preserved smoothly, with small dihedral angles (<20.3°) to allow
the full conjugation. It is considered that the formation of 6 is
triggered by regioselective cleavage at the meso-R bond next to
pyrrole ring A and subsequent bond rotation between pyrrole rings
D and E (Scheme 2).
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
(A) [19205006 (A) and 20108001 “pi-Space”] for Scientific
Research from MEXT. S.S. acknowledges a JSPS Fellowship for
Young Scientists.
Supporting Information Available: Sample preparation, charac-
terization, DFT single-point calculations, and X-ray crystallographic
details for 4 (CCDC-751202) and 6 (CCDC-751203). This material is
References
(1) Newman, M. S.; Lednicer, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 4765.
(2) Lehn, J.-M.; Rigault, A.; Siegel, J.; Harrowfield, J.; Chevrier, B.; Moras,
D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987, 84, 2565.
(3) (a) Nelson, J. C.; Saven, J. G.; Moore, J. S.; Wolynes, P. G. Science 1997,
277, 1793. (b) Berl, V.; Huc, I.; Khoury, R. G.; Krische, M. J.; Lehn, J.-
M. Nature 2000, 407, 720.
(4) Tanaka, K.; Tengeiji, A.; Kato, T.; Toyama, N.; Shionoya, M. Science 2003,
299, 1212.
(5) Miyasaka, M.; Rajca, A.; Pink, M.; Rajca, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 13806.
(6) Tanaka, Y.; Katagiri, H.; Furusho, Y.; Yashima, E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 3867.
(7) Tagami, K.; Tsukada, M.; Wada, Y.; Iwasaki, T.; Nishide, H. J. Chem.
Phys. 2003, 119, 7491.
(8) Gholami, M.; Tykwinski, R. P. Chem. ReV. 2006, 106, 4997.
(9) Randic´, M. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3449.
(10) For ring-opening reactions of tetrapyrrole systems, see: (a) Krautler, B. In
The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.;
Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; Vol. 13, p 183. (b) Gossauer, A. In
The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.;
Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; Vol. 13, p 237. (c) Struckmeier, G.;
Thewalt, U.; Fuhrhop, J.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 278. (d) Balch,
A. L.; Mazzanti, M.; Noll, B. C.; Olmstead, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 114, 9114. (e) Smith, K. M.; Brown, S. B.; Troxler, R. F.; Lai, J.-J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 2763. (f) Iturraspe, J.; Gossauer, A. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1991, 74, 1713. (g) Tardieux, C.; Gros, C. P.; Guilard, R. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1998, 35, 965. (h) Furuta, H.; Maeda, H.; Osuka, A. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 181. (i) Latos-Graz˙yn´ski, L.; Johnson, J.; Attar, S.; Olmstead, M. M.;
Balch, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4493.
(11) For syntheses of acyclic oligopyrromethenes, see: (a) Morosini, P.; Scherer,
M.; Meyer, S.; Lynch, V.; Sessler, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8848. (b)
Gross, Z.; Galili, N.; Simkhovich, L.; Saltsman, I.; Botoshansky, M.; Blaser,
D.; Boese, R.; Goldberg, I. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 599. (c) Shin, J.-Y.; Hepperle,
S. S.; Patrick, B. O.; Dolphin, D. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2323.
(12) Tanaka, Y.; Hoshino, W.; Shimizu, S.; Youfu, K.; Aratani, N.; Maruyama,
N.; Fujita, S.; Osuka, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3046.
(13) See the SI for crystallographic details.
Figure 3. X-ray crystal structure of 6: (left) 50% probability thermal
ellipsoid plot; (right) space-filling plot. The meso-C6F5 substituents have
been omitted for clarity.
The UV-vis-NIR absorption spectrum of 6 in CH2Cl2 (Figure
2) shows a low-energy broad band at 1262 nm with ε ) 11 000
M-1 cm-1. The temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility
measurements revealed the presence in 6 of two Cu(II) ions and
their antiferromagnetic interaction with J/kB ) -6.75 K (Figure
1b). The larger antiferromagnetic interaction in 6 than in 4 may be
ascribed to the superexchange interaction mediated by N(4). ESR
measurements at 5 K again showed a clear half-field resonance
signal (see the SI). The delocalized spin density distribution also
supports the full conjugation.15 Finally, the conformational flex-
(14) Colby, D. A.; Ferrence, G. M.; Lash, T. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 1345.
(15) Density functional theory (DFT) single-point calculations [UB3LYP/6-
31G*/LANL2DZ(Cu)] on 4 and 6 were performed on the basis of the crystal
structures (see the SI).
(16) Saito, S.; Furukawa, K.; Osuka, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8086.
JA909929S
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 7, 2010 2129