Page 7 of 8
CrystEngComm
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
2
3
Biopolymers, 2002, 64, 246–254.
magnificence) was captured on Nikon Digital Sight DS-U3
microscope.
L. D. Valle, A. Nardi, P. Belvedere, MD. OTIo: 1n0i.1a0n3d9/CL.9CAEl0ib1a16r8dDi,
Dev. Dyn. 2007, 236, 1939-1953.
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM)
FESEM samples were prepared by drop casting (10 µL) of 1.5
4
5
S. Mondal and E. Gazit, ChemNanoMat 2016, 2, 323–332.
S. Bera and E. Gazit, Protein & Peptide Letters, 2019, 26, 88-
97.
D. Haldar, S. K. Maji, W. S. Sheldrick and A. Banerjee,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 2653–2656.
mM of peptide
1 and 2 on Al-foil and dried them inside a
6
7
8
9
desiccator. FESEM images were captured using a SIGMA-300
(ZEISS) instrument.
S. Guha, M. G. B. Drew and A. Banerjee, Org. Lett., 2007,
1347–1350.
9,
Transmission electron microscope (TEM)
P. Jana, S. Maity, S. K. Maity and D. Haldar, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 2092–2094.
S. K. Maity, S. Maity, P. Jana and D. Haldar, Chem. Commun.,
2012, 48, 711–713.
TEM images were captured under JEOL (Model: 2100F)
instrument. The 7 days incubated sample (1.5 mM) was
diluted to 100 µM and from this 10 µL of sample was drop-
casted on carbon-coated copper grid followed by adding 2%
uranyl acetate solution (10 µL) and was allowed to float for 1
min and kept inside desiccator.
10 A. Sharma , P. Tiwari, and A. Dutt Konar, J. Mol. Struct., 2018,
1161, 44-54.
11 P. Tiwari, S. Biswas, R. Verma, A. Sharma, and A. Dutt Konar,
ChemistrySelect, 2018, 3, 262–272.
12 C. H. Görbitz, Chem. – Eur. J., 2007, 13, 1022–1031.
13 A. Bandyopadhyay, S. V. Jadhav and H. N. Gopi, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 7170–7172.
14 R. Misra, S. Dey, R. M. Reja and H. N. Gopi, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1057–1061.
15 L. Gorla, V. Martí-Centelles, B. Altava, M. I. Burguete and S.
V. Luis, CrystEngComm, 2019, 21, 2398-2408.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we demonstrated the conformation and
morphology of both N- and C- protected alternating D/L amino
acids containing tripeptides, Boc-Gly-L-Phg-D-Phe-OMe (
Boc-Gly-L-Phg-D-Phg-OMe (
that they exhibited anti-parallel β-sheet structures, but
16 S. Beraꢀ, S. Mondal, B. Xue, L. J. W. Shimonꢀ, Y. Caoꢀ ꢀand E.
Gazit, Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 503–509.
1) and
2
). The SC-XRD analyses suggested 17 R. S. Al Toma, C. Brie e, M. J. Cryle and R. D. S ssmuth, Nat.
Prod. Rep., 2015, 32, 1207−1235.
1
2
self-
self-
18 Y. Mast and W. Wohlleben, Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 304
44–50.
,
assembled to form helix-like architecture whereas
associated to form double helix-like structures. Both
supramolecular structures were stabilized by intermolecular H-
bond as well as C-H…O and C-H…π interactions. Although there
was no intramolecular H-bond in these peptides as suggested
19 B. A. Wallace and K. Ravikumar, science, 1988, 241, 182-187.
20 G. Bunkóczi, L. Vértesy and G. M. Sheldrick, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1340–1342.
21 J. B. Hamburger, A. J. Hoertz, A. Lee, R. J. Senturia, D. G.
McCafferty and P. J. Loll, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106
13759–13764.
22 R. S. Giri and B. Mandal, CrystEngComm, 2019, 21, 236–243.
,
by SC-XRD and solvent dependent NMR studies,
1 exhibited
turn-like structure in solution suggested by CD and 2D NOESY
experiment. They also self-associated to form flower-like
structures in 30% acetonitrile-water. The differences in
molecular arrangements among these peptides are due to the
presence of the methylene group (D-Phe) or absence of
methylene group (D-Phg) at the side chain. The obtained
results may be helpful for the design of supramolecular single
or double helix-like structure using alternating D/L amino
acids.
23 D. Dev, N. B. Palakurthy, K. Thalluri, J. Chandra and B.
Mandal, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 5420–5431.
24 R. S. Giri, S. R. Manne, G. Dolai, A. Paul, T. Kalita and B.
Mandal, ACS Omega, 2017, 2, 6586–6597.
25 P. De Santis, S. Morosetti and R. Rizzo, Macromolecules,
1974, , 52–58.
7
26 D. T. Bong, T. D. Clark, J. R. Granja and M. R. Ghadiri, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 988–1011.
27 C. Toniolo, M. Crisma, F. Formaggio, A. Polese, M. Doi, T.
Ishida, E. Mossel, Q. Broxterman and J. Kamphuis,
Biopolymers, 1996, 40, 523–527.
28 A. Dutt, A. Dutta, R. Mondal, E. C. Spencer, J. A. K. Howard
and A. Pramanik, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 10282–10289.
29 R. S. Giri and B. Mandal, CrystEngComm, 2018, 20, 4441–
4448.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
30 CrysAlisPro Oxford Diffraction Ltd. version 1, 2009, 171.
33.34d.
31 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found.
Crystallogr., 2008, 64, 112–122.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to central Instruments facility (CIF),
Department of Chemistry IIT Guwahati for instrumental
facilities and the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India,
for financial support (BT/PR16164/NER/95/88/2015).
Notes and references
1
M. Novotny and G. J. Kleywegt, J. Mol. Biol., 2005, 347, 231–
241.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 7
Please do not adjust margins