Angewandte
Chemie
Table 2: Hydroalkoxylation optimization.
groups, such as Cbz, significantly reduced the conversion to
8% (Table 1, entry 6). Additionally, a polar, noncoordinating
solvent such as nitromethane was effective, producing 2 f in
98% conversion and 87% ee. However, nonpolar solvents
(benzene) and coordinating solvents (dioxane) completely
eliminated catalyst activity.
Entry
Catalyst[a]
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
I
0
–
65
Whereas gold(I)/bis(p-nitrobenzoate) complexes proved
to be ineffective catalysts for the hydroalkoxylation of allenes
(Table 2, entry 1), we hypothesized that employing a more
noncoordinating counterion with a lower pKa value would
improve catalysis. Chiral silver sulfonate (S)-(5)Ag (IV) was
synthesized in seven steps from (S)-binol (binol = 2,2-dihy-
droxy-1,1-binaphthyl).[9] Gratifyingly, upon treatment with
3 mol% [dppm(AuCl)2] and 3 mol% IV, isoxazolidine 4 was
formed in quantitative conversion and 65% ee (Table 2,
entry 2). However, attempts to improve the enantioselectvity
by matching the chiral counterion with chiral gold/binap
complexes were unsuccessful (Table 2, entries 3 and 4). Both
the matched and mismatched mixtures produced 4 with lower
enantioselectivity (42% and 8% ee, respectively). Chiral
silver phosphate (S)-TriPAg (III) proved to be the key to
enhancing the enantioselectivity to 97% ee (Table 2, entry 5).
We next sought to test the substrate scope of our
optimized hydroamination conditions (Table 3). Linear and
cyclic alkyl substitutions were tolerated at the allene terminus
in both the hydrazine and hydroxylamine hydroamination.
For instance, methyl-substituted substrates cyclized with
excellent enantioselectivity (Table 3, entries 1 and 4). Cyclo-
hexyl-substituted allenes also reacted with high enantioselec-
tivity (Table 3, entries 3 and 6). Cyclopentyl-substituted
substrates 8 and 12 also provided pyrazolidine 9 and
isoxazolidine 13 in good yield and slightly lower enantiose-
lectivity (Table 3, entries 2 and 5). Furthermore, sterically
challenging backbone substitutions were accommodated by
heating gently (508C) in a polar, noncoordinating solvent
(nitromethane). Whereas substitution at the allenic position
(Table 3, entry 8) gave enhanced
3 mol% [dppm(AuCl)2]
3 mol% IV
98[d]
3
4
5
3 mol% [(R)-binap(AuCl)2]
3 mol% IV
3 mol% [(S)-binap(AuCl)2]
3 mol% IV
3 mol% [dppm(AuCl)2]
6 mol% III
98[d]
98
8
42
98
98
[a] Reaction Conditions: 0.1m in toluene, 238C, 15 h; [b] Yield of product
isolated after column chromatography. [c] Determined by HPLC meth-
ods. [d] Conversion determined by 1H NMR analysis. dppm=bis(diphe-
nylphosphanyl)methane.
The advantage of the increased nucleophilicity of hydrox-
ylamines was demonstrated in the cyclization onto tetrasub-
stituted allenes. Nucleophilic additions to tetrasubstituted
allenes is challenging; only a handful of substrates have been
reported.[4a,10] Whereas the use of a protecting group is
normally beneficial to enantioselectivity (vide supra), in the
case of addition to sterically encumbered substrates such
protecting groups are detrimental to both the observed
enantioselectivity and conversion [Eq. (2)]. Unprotected
hydroxylamines, however, when treated with the same
enantioselectivity
(99%)
with
modest yield (73%), the homoal-
lenic position showed the reverse
trend: modest enantioselectivity
(63%) and excellent yield (94%).
We also applied our hydroami-
nation conditions to the formation
of six-membered ring tetrahydroox-
azine heterocycles. Gentle heating
in a polar noncoordinating solvent
was required to produce tetrahy-
drooxazines in good yield (63–
85%). Substrates with backbone
substitutions (Table 3, entries 10
and 11) have higher yield than
those without substitutions, pre-
sumably the result of a Thorpe–
Ingold effect. Also, both linear and
cyclic alkyl substitutions were tol-
erated at the allene terminus, pro-
viding the heterocycles with 89% ee
in all cases.
Table 3: Hydrazine and hydroxylamine hydroamination scope.
Entry Substrate
R1
R2
Cond.[a] Product
Yield ee
[%][b] [%][c]
1
2
3
6
8
Me
-(CH2)4-
–
–
–
A
A
A
7
9
98
90
2c 75
99
83
97
1c -(CH2)5-
4
5
6
10
12
1 f
Me
-(CH2)4-
-(CH2)5-
–
–
–
B
B
B
11
13
2 f
91
98
93
98
91
93
7
8
14
16
Me
H
H
Me
C
C
15
17
94
73
63
99
9
10
11
18
20
22
-(CH2)5-
-(CH2)5- Me
Me Me
H
D[d]
D
D
19
21
23
63
85
79
89
89
89
[a] Reaction Conditions: A=[(R)-DTBM-Segphos(AuOPNB)2] (5 mol%), 0.3m in MeNO2, 508C, 15 h;
B=I (3 mol%), 0.1m in CH2Cl2, 238C, 24 h; C=[(R)-DM-MeOBiPhep(AuOPNB)2] (5 mol%), 0.1m in
MeNO2, 508C, 24 h; D=I (5 mol%), 0.3m in MeNO2, 508C, 24 h. [b] Yield of the product isolated after
column chromatography. [c] Determined by HPLC methods. [d] 36 h, 658C. DM-MeOBiPhep=2,2’-
bis[di(3,5-xylyl)phosphino]-6,6’-dimethoxy-1,1’-biphenyl.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 598 –601
ꢀ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
599